#deadbankers - American Express president Ed Gilligan dies at 55
Ed Gilligan, the American Express Co. president viewed as a possible
successor to Chief Executive Officer Kenneth I. Chenault, died Friday
after becoming ill on an overseas flight to New York. He was 55.
Gilligan was returning from a business trip to Tokyo on a corporate jet, which made an emergency landing after he was stricken, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Efforts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful and the cause of death is undetermined, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing a personal issue.
“This is deeply painful and frankly unimaginable for all of us who had the great fortune to work with Ed, and benefit from his insights, leadership and enthusiasm,” Chenault said in a letter to the company’s employees. “His contributions have left an indelible imprint on practically every area of our business.”
Gilligan began working as an intern at the firm 35 years ago while a student at New York University, and later spent time in London as a group president overseeing the firm’s international consumer business, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was named vice chairman in 2007 and president in 2013, and oversaw digital initiatives, including a partnership reached last year with car-service firm Uber Technologies Inc.
“He devoted his entire career to this company,” Chenault wrote. “He was a proud husband and father, and his love for his family was evident in all that he did.”
“He always liked to be out with clients,” said Gordon Smith, CEO of consumer and community banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co., who worked with Gilligan at AmEx for more than two decades. “He knew everyone, took time to learn people’s names, he knew about their families.”
Gilligan was widely considered a leading candidate to eventually succeed Chenault, according to analysts including Portales Partners’ William Ryan. Chenault, 63, held the title of president before getting the top job in 2001.
He attended the University of Tampa, where he played soccer until a knee injury ended his career. He then enrolled at NYU, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in economics and management in 1982.
Gilligan was group president of global corporate services on 9/11, when the company’s headquarters at the World Financial Center in New York were damaged in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center Towers across the street.
“We were the fastest growing business in the company going into 2001, and we were the business most decimated,” Gilligan said in a 2014 interview with the Financial Times.
Gilligan is survived by his wife, the former Lisa Sneddon, and their children –- Katie, Meaghan, Kevin and Shane, the company said.
Gilligan was returning from a business trip to Tokyo on a corporate jet, which made an emergency landing after he was stricken, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Efforts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful and the cause of death is undetermined, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing a personal issue.
“This is deeply painful and frankly unimaginable for all of us who had the great fortune to work with Ed, and benefit from his insights, leadership and enthusiasm,” Chenault said in a letter to the company’s employees. “His contributions have left an indelible imprint on practically every area of our business.”
Gilligan began working as an intern at the firm 35 years ago while a student at New York University, and later spent time in London as a group president overseeing the firm’s international consumer business, according to his LinkedIn profile. He was named vice chairman in 2007 and president in 2013, and oversaw digital initiatives, including a partnership reached last year with car-service firm Uber Technologies Inc.
“He devoted his entire career to this company,” Chenault wrote. “He was a proud husband and father, and his love for his family was evident in all that he did.”
Chelsea Football
Gilligan’s Twitter profile described him as working at the New York-based credit-card issuer and “dreaming of Chelsea football and a good glass of wine, hoping to make a positive impact.” His last tweet, on May 16, referred to a comment about David Letterman’s final show.“He always liked to be out with clients,” said Gordon Smith, CEO of consumer and community banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co., who worked with Gilligan at AmEx for more than two decades. “He knew everyone, took time to learn people’s names, he knew about their families.”
Gilligan was widely considered a leading candidate to eventually succeed Chenault, according to analysts including Portales Partners’ William Ryan. Chenault, 63, held the title of president before getting the top job in 2001.
First Generation
Edward Patrick Gilligan was born July 13, 1959, in Brooklyn, New York. He was a first generation Irish-American with family from Castlerea, Ireland, on his father’s side, according to a profile in Boardroom Insiders.He attended the University of Tampa, where he played soccer until a knee injury ended his career. He then enrolled at NYU, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in economics and management in 1982.
Gilligan was group president of global corporate services on 9/11, when the company’s headquarters at the World Financial Center in New York were damaged in the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center Towers across the street.
“We were the fastest growing business in the company going into 2001, and we were the business most decimated,” Gilligan said in a 2014 interview with the Financial Times.
Gilligan is survived by his wife, the former Lisa Sneddon, and their children –- Katie, Meaghan, Kevin and Shane, the company said.
18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
Pete BennettMay 26, 2015Contra Costa County, Dead Attorneys, Federal Statutes, Federal Statutes Home, RICO, Title 18. CRIMES
Witness Tampering
The Asset Forfeiture Games
June 2019 - Benny and Chris Butler were released from Federal Custody and not longer the entire town of Paradise burned to the ground where the ex-wife of Pete Bennett was nearly killed.
18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to—
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent to—
(B) cause or induce any person to—
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object for use in an official proceeding;
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation [1] supervised release,, [1] parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from—
(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation [1] supervised release,, [1] parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation proceeding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative defense, as to which the defendant has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct consisted solely of lawful conduct and that the defendant’s sole intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other person to testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section—
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be proved with respect to the circumstance—
(i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought in the district in which the official proceeding (whether or not pending or about to be instituted) was intended to be affected or in the district in which the conduct constituting the alleged offense occurred.
(j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.
Related
#blameBush
As the Presidential Election leads us forward the secrets behind the #Deadbankers story nags at minds of millions of Americans and Citizens of the world. The reality of 9/11 is it possible that the bankers located at the World Trade Center.
In 2003, US programmer Kevin Flanagan joined the ranks of suspicious bank related suicides now a global pandemic likely far bigger than being touted by media pundits in late 2013.
When read my story about the murders near me and the attempts to kill me, my family and friends it's becoming clear that the Federal Indictments looming with Albert D. Seeno, his connections to the legal community judges and bankers clearly are my problem.
Mr. President, Mr. Burd attends Hillside Covenant Church
where several members attempted to kill me in 2011
while I was employed at PG&E developing software
for what has become this Federal Investigation
Nice to know you keep good company
or you're a really good at bluffing.
Not far from the Bay Area was the alleged murder suicide of Phillip Marshall and his two children. Currently classified as a familial murder but given that Marshall's story connects to 9/11, that his connections leads to cases near me.
For the moment ponder this pool of connectors published by NNDB and the fact that I've alleged since 2012, that Steve Burd's friends at Hillside Covenant Church are behind one of several attempted murders on my person.
In 2014, I filed claims with the City of Walnut Creek and within seven days officers tried to run me down, wrote me fresh tickets on top of the 20K I already.
Mr. President I am a dying a slowly roasted death being exposed to the elements with every incident now eclipsing over 100 cases (38 years). Mr. President this page is easy to prove or disprove but Accenture controls decisions at SBC, AT&T, Wells Fargo, Symantec, Bank of America and even have a leg in the Federal Reserve.
I'm looking for the best plausible denial about how Accenture magically touches every major case in the country which is supported by my argument they are the Masters of Disasters. You only need two to make a conspiracy, right?
#strackdeaths #strackdeaths
DANIEL HOROWITZ VS. JOSEPH LYNCH
Lynch Sued Contra Costa County after he was
Vitale Murder
- Beaten by Deputies
- Settled for $500.000
- Sells Land to Horowitz
Vitale Murder
- Investigator Eric Collins
- Bennett v. Gary Collins
Party Name | Type | Case Name | Category | Case Number | Filed |
LYNCH, JOSEPH | PLAINTIFF | JOSEPH LYNCH VSVIRGINIA E. LYNCH | PETN FOR DISSOLUTION | FLMSD93-04838 | 10/04/1993 |
LYNCH, JOSEPH W | DEFENDANT | DANIEL HOROWITZ VS. JOSEPH LYNCH | CIVIL HARASSMENT | CIVMSN05-0778 | 06/15/2005 |
LYNCH, JOSEPH WILLIAM | DEFENDANT | CHAO VS LYNCH | PI/PD/MOTOR VEHICLE (MARTINEZ) | CIVMSC04-00245 | 02/09/2004 |
June 21, 2008 6:00 pm Humboldt Fire Incident Information: (BUTTE COUNTY)
Humboldt Fire
Humboldt Fire Incident Information: | |||
Last Updated: | June 21, 2008 6:00 pm | FINAL | |
Date/Time Started: | June 11, 2008 12:13 pm | ||
Administrative Unit: | CAL FIRE/Butte County Fire | ||
County: | Butte County | ||
Location: | Hwy 32 & Humboldt Rd on Stillson Canyon | ||
Acres Burned - Containment: | 23,344 acres | ||
Estimated - Containment: | 100% contained - 23,344 acres | ||
Structures Destroyed: | 87 residences destroyed and 7 damaged. 167 outbuildings have also been destroyed. | ||
Evacuations: | All evacuations and road closures have been lifted. | ||
Road Closures : | Full containment expected June 19, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. | ||
Injuries: | 10 | ||
Cause: | Under Investigation | ||
Cooperating Agencies: | Butte County, CHP, Butte County Sheriff, City of Paradise (fire & police) | ||
Total Fire Personnel: | 261 (256 CAL FIRE) | ||
Total Fire Engines: | 15 CAL FIRE | ||
Total Fire crews: | 5 CAL FIRE | ||
Total Dozers: | 1 | ||
Total Water Tenders: | 3 | ||
Costs to date: | $20.5 million | ||
Conditions: | A significant demobilization of resources is underway. The command team plans on transitioning the incident back to the unit June 19 at 1200 noon. Public Health has closed its temporary animal shelters. | ||
Phone Numbers | (530) 538-7826 (Humboldt Fire Information Number) |
Litigation Associate
Pete BennettMay 01, 2015City of Concord, City of Walnut Creek, contra Costa Bar Association, Contra Costa Superior Court, mcnamaralaw.com, The State Bar of California
If you're considering a law degree consider that my Kaitlyn Strand worked here: She's dead
Litigation Associate
|
|
APPLY FOR THIS JOB
Job Description
The McNamara Law Firm is a 35+ attorney civil litigation defense
firm with offices in Contra Costa and Solano Counties, seeking a
litigation associate for its Walnut Creek Office, with one to four years of relevant experience. Police and civil rights defense experience are preferred. Successful
candidates will have excellent writing and research skills, a strong
academic background from an accredited law school, be a self-starter,
and be willing to accept significant responsibility in a broad range of
litigation matters. We offer a congenial atmosphere and competitive
salary and benefits. All inquiries will be treated confidentially.
Please email resume and short writing sample to hr@mcnamaralaw.com
l 4-cr-00272-JSR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE STEWART, Defendant.
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE STEWART, Defendant.
INFORMATION
I: l 4-cr-00272-JSR
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud)
The Department of Justice charges: 1. From at least in or about May 2006 through at least in or about early 2011, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, LEE STEWART, the defendant, together with Anthony Allen, Paul Thompson, Tetsuya Motomura, Anthony Conti, and others known and unknown, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree to commit certain offenses against the United States, that is: (A) to devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and to transmit and cause to be transmitted certain wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce for the purpose of executing the scheme; to wit, the defendant and others engaged in a scheme to manipulate and attempt to manipulate to their advantage the benchmark interest rates referenced by derivative products throughout the financial industry, by the
1
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 4
dissemination, and submission, of false and fraudulent statements intended to influence and manipulate the benchmark interest rates to which the profitability of interest rate derivative trades was tied, and the conspirators contemplated, foresaw, and caused use of wires in interstate and foreign commerce in carrying out the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and (B) to execute and attempt to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud a financial institution, the deposits for which were at the time insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and to obtain and attempt to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, and other properties owned by and under the custody and control of a financial institution by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, as well as by omission of material facts in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. 2. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that LEE STEWART, the defendant, and others known and unknown, engaged in a scheme to manipulate and attempt to manipulate a benchmark interest rate known as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), to which was tied the profitability of interest rate derivative trades in which the defendant and others had a financial interest. The scheme had an effect on one or more financial institutions, within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 20 and 3293(2). OVERT ACT 3. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to affect the illegal objects thereof, LEE STEW ART, the defendant, and others known and unknown, committed the following overt act, among others, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:
2
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 4
a. on or about September 2, 2005, LEE STEWART and Anthony Conti conspired to fix and manipulate the day's LIB OR rate by causing their employer, Coiiperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), a financial institution and global financial services company headquartered in Utrecht, the Netherlands, to make a LIBOR submission that was calculated to benefit LEE STEW ART's trading position. Rabobank and Bank-B, a federally-insured financial institution headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, had previously entered into an interest rate swap transaction that had a reset date of September 2, 2005. On or about September 2, 2005, a third party publishing corporation published Rabobank's manipulated LIBOR submission by sending a wire communication from the United Kingdom to recipients in New York, New York. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349) FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 4. As a result of committing the offense alleged in Count One of this Information, LEE STEW ART, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982, any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the wire fraud and bank fraud offense alleged in Count One of this Information, including but not limited to a sum of United States currency to be determined by the Court at sentencing, in that such sum in aggregate is property representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the offenses. Substitute Asset Provision 5. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
3
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; ( c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; ( d) has been substantially diminished in value; or ( e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code, Section 982(b), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the above forfeitable property. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 982 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349).
ANDREW WEISSMANN Chief, Fraud Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice
BRIAN YOUNG Trial Attorney CAROL L. SIPPERL Y Senior Litigation Counsel Criminal Division United States Department of Justice
JEFFREY D. MARTINO Chief, New York Office Antitrust Division United States Department of Justice
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 4 of 4
4
MICHAEL T. KOENIG Trial Attorney Antitrust division United States Department of Justice
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEE STEWART, Defendant.
INFORMATION
I: l 4-cr-00272-JSR
COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Bank Fraud)
The Department of Justice charges: 1. From at least in or about May 2006 through at least in or about early 2011, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, LEE STEWART, the defendant, together with Anthony Allen, Paul Thompson, Tetsuya Motomura, Anthony Conti, and others known and unknown, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree to commit certain offenses against the United States, that is: (A) to devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and to transmit and cause to be transmitted certain wire communications in interstate and foreign commerce for the purpose of executing the scheme; to wit, the defendant and others engaged in a scheme to manipulate and attempt to manipulate to their advantage the benchmark interest rates referenced by derivative products throughout the financial industry, by the
1
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 4
dissemination, and submission, of false and fraudulent statements intended to influence and manipulate the benchmark interest rates to which the profitability of interest rate derivative trades was tied, and the conspirators contemplated, foresaw, and caused use of wires in interstate and foreign commerce in carrying out the scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and (B) to execute and attempt to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud a financial institution, the deposits for which were at the time insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and to obtain and attempt to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, and other properties owned by and under the custody and control of a financial institution by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, as well as by omission of material facts in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. 2. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that LEE STEWART, the defendant, and others known and unknown, engaged in a scheme to manipulate and attempt to manipulate a benchmark interest rate known as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), to which was tied the profitability of interest rate derivative trades in which the defendant and others had a financial interest. The scheme had an effect on one or more financial institutions, within the meaning of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 20 and 3293(2). OVERT ACT 3. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to affect the illegal objects thereof, LEE STEW ART, the defendant, and others known and unknown, committed the following overt act, among others, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:
2
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 4
a. on or about September 2, 2005, LEE STEWART and Anthony Conti conspired to fix and manipulate the day's LIB OR rate by causing their employer, Coiiperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), a financial institution and global financial services company headquartered in Utrecht, the Netherlands, to make a LIBOR submission that was calculated to benefit LEE STEW ART's trading position. Rabobank and Bank-B, a federally-insured financial institution headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, had previously entered into an interest rate swap transaction that had a reset date of September 2, 2005. On or about September 2, 2005, a third party publishing corporation published Rabobank's manipulated LIBOR submission by sending a wire communication from the United Kingdom to recipients in New York, New York. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349) FORFEITURE ALLEGATION 4. As a result of committing the offense alleged in Count One of this Information, LEE STEW ART, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982, any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the wire fraud and bank fraud offense alleged in Count One of this Information, including but not limited to a sum of United States currency to be determined by the Court at sentencing, in that such sum in aggregate is property representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the offenses. Substitute Asset Provision 5. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
3
(a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; ( c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; ( d) has been substantially diminished in value; or ( e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code, Section 982(b), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the above forfeitable property. (Title 18, United States Code, Section 982 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349).
ANDREW WEISSMANN Chief, Fraud Section Criminal Division United States Department of Justice
BRIAN YOUNG Trial Attorney CAROL L. SIPPERL Y Senior Litigation Counsel Criminal Division United States Department of Justice
JEFFREY D. MARTINO Chief, New York Office Antitrust Division United States Department of Justice
Case 1:14-cr-00272-JSR Document 40 Filed 03/23/15 Page 4 of 4
4
MICHAEL T. KOENIG Trial Attorney Antitrust division United States Department of Justice
#BillGwilliam - who is Bill?
Coming soon from an Airport Hanger near you - the Bankruptcy trustee sounds just like the accountant at a company in Charleston who is located in Pleasanton.
The Pamela Vitale Murder CIVMSC01-00428 - CORRIE VS BINGHAM-MCCANN
Case CIVMSC01-00428 - CORRIE VS BINGHAM-MCCANN
|
||||||||||||||
Party Number | Party Type | Party Name | Attorney | Party Status | ||||||||||
1 | PLAINTIFF | SIDNEY CORRIE JR | PUTTERMAN, DONALD J | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
, SIDEMAN & BA NCROFT,LLP | ||||||||||||||
6 | INTERVENOR | ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA | JOHNS, BELINDA J. | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
2 | DEFENDANT | BINGHAM-MCCANN | HOROWITZ, DANIEL | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
MILLER, STARR & REGALIA | ||||||||||||||
3 | DEFENDANT | WILLIAM D MCCANN | MCCANN, WILLIAM D | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
4 | DEFENDANT | J GORDON BINGHAM | MILLER, STARR & REGALIA | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
5 | DEFENDANT | 500 LA GONDA ASSOCIATES LLC | BRUNNER, STEPHEN P. | PARTY DISMISSED 09/10/2002 | ||||||||||
7 | DEFENDANT | WILLIAM Y TAUSCHER | BRUNNER, STEPHEN P. | DISMISSED 11/25/2002 | ||||||||||
YERKES, LYNNE M | ||||||||||||||
8 | DEFENDANT | TRI COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC | ROECA, RUSSELL S | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
9 | DEFENDANT | JAY T LEWIS | ROECA, RUSSELL S | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
15 | DEFENDANT | J.O.E., INC | BRUNNER, STEPHEN P. | DISMISSED 11/25/2002 | ||||||||||
16 | DEFENDANT | JAY T LEWIS | Unrepresented | PARTY REMOVED 09/17/2001 | ||||||||||
17 | DEFENDANT | THE MT DIABLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATIO | CHAZAN, SHOSHANA Y. | PARTY DISMISSED 07/16/2003 | ||||||||||
18 | DEFENDANT | RANDEL N EVANS | CHAZAN, SHOSHANA Y. | PARTY DISMISSED 05/22/2002 |
|
||||||||||||||
Party Number | Party Type | Party Name | Attorney | Party Status | ||||||||||
6 | PLAINTIFF | ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA | JOHNS, BELINDA J. | PARTY DISMISSED 07/15/2003 | ||||||||||
5 | DEFENDANT | 500 LA GONDA ASSOCIATES LLC | BRUNNER, STEPHEN P. | PARTY DISMISSED 07/15/2003 | ||||||||||
10 | DEFENDANT | BELASCO THEATRE CO | ROGERS, RANDY | PARTY DISMISSED 07/15/2003 | ||||||||||
11 | DEFENDANT | WILLIAM D MCCANN | MILLER, STARR & REGALIA | PARTY DISMISSED 07/15/2003 | ||||||||||
12 | DEFENDANT | J GORDON BINGHAM | MILLER, STARR & REGALIA | PARTY DISMISSED 07/15/2003 | ||||||||||
13 | DEFENDANT | FIRST REPUBLIC BANK | Unrepresented | PARTY DISMISSED 11/26/2001 | ||||||||||
14 | DEFENDANT | BANK OF THE ORIENT | Unrepresented | PARTY DISMISSED 11/26/2001 |
|
||||||||||||||
Party Number | Party Type | Party Name | Attorney | Party Status | ||||||||||
2 | CROSS COMPLAINANT | BINGHAM-MCCANN | HOROWITZ, DANIEL | First Paper Fee Paid | ||||||||||
3 | CROSS COMPLAINANT | WILLIAM D MCCANN | MCCANN, WILLIAM D | First Paper Fee Paid | ||||||||||
4 | CROSS COMPLAINANT | J GORDON BINGHAM | MILLER, STARR & REGALIA | First Paper Fee Paid | ||||||||||
5 | CROSS COMPLAINANT | 500 LA GONDA ASSOCIATES LLC | BRUNNER, STEPHEN P. | First Paper Fee Paid | ||||||||||
1 | CROSS DEFENDANT | SIDNEY CORRIE JR | PUTTERMAN, DONALD J | Demurr 09/10/2002 | ||||||||||
6 | CROSS DEFENDANT | ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA | JOHNS, BELINDA J. | Answer 09/10/2002 | ||||||||||
10 | CROSS DEFENDANT | BELASCO THEATRE CO | ROGERS, RANDY | Answer 05/14/2002 | ||||||||||
17 | CROSS DEFENDANT | THE MT DIABLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS FOUNDATIO | CHAZAN, SHOSHANA Y. | Answer 05/16/2002 |
#FraudOfTheCourt #DeadWitnesses and #DeadPoliticians #JudgeGolub
#TheGolubConspiracy - Ruler of Bench felled by friends in the Pen
It took over ten years to discover via Judge Golub's endorsement list to uncover additional connections to the CNET Scandal in Danville CA. Today we have to worst possible scenario of #FraudOfTheCourt where we many #DeadPoliticians and far too many children murdered near these cases.The reign of terror elicited via Commander Wielsch and misleading Deputies, a man who felled himself all by himself. Many have fallen including officers down on Last Watch as when he aligned his world++ with Chris Butler, he ultimately felled himself.
I personally know the #TheGolubConspiracy first hand as Green Valley Elementary parent, Pack 36 member and as traffic commissioner issuers of false fines.
He's Judged us from the early nineties but today he's facing a #FraudOfTheCourt, he's hub of a spoke to hundreds of deputies, attorneys and public officials. Theruled from the bench but in my case he's the Judge that knows Tanabe, District Attorneys who failed to recognize the #DirtyDUI problem but he is the Judge that took several Divorce Cases into his courtroom, he's the Judge admonished by the Judicial Council Review in the Bruce Mills matter but my connection is ominous, speaks volumes of mayhem leading to murders of children.
The failures when Judge Golub missed an opportunity to stop an arson operation with connections to Gas Line Explosions to the power energy sector where former Enron CEO Jeffery Skilling is now serving time and perhaps he needs #insiderterrorists where they can use the jail pencils to catalog the #DeadWitnesses where I can attest witnesses in my story have been murdered in #ColdCaseCounty like Jineva Driscoll.
This is also Jaycee Dugard Country with a former sheriff once ruled with six batteries earning the nickname of D-Cell.
Action
#William Michael McCann [#66753] Disbarred, represented by Horowitz
Pete BennettApril 11, 2015Commercial Real Estate, Contra Costa District Attorney, Daniel Horowitz, The State Bar of California, Town of Danville
Attorney Search
William Michael McCann - #66753
Current Status: Active
This member is active and may practice law in California.See below for more details.
Profile Information
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.Bar Number: | 66753 | ||
Address: | 1530 Meridian Ave Ste 120 San Jose, CA 95125 Map it | Phone Number: | (408) 269-8787 |
Fax Number: | Not Available | ||
e-mail: | Not Available | ||
County: | Santa Clara | Undergraduate School: | Univ of California at Los Angeles; CA |
District: | District 6 | ||
Sections: | None | Law School: | Santa Clara Univ SOL; Santa Clara CA |
Status History
Effective Date | Status Change | |
Present | Active | |
9/17/2008 | Active | |
7/19/2008 | Not Eligible To Practice Law | |
3/11/2002 | Active | |
9/1/2001 | Not Eligible To Practice Law | |
12/18/1975 | Admitted to The State Bar of California |
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law
Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
Explanation of common actions
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
Effective Date | Case Number | Description |
7/19/2008 | 05-O-00119 | Opinion [PDF] [WORD] |
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are .July 19, 2008
WILLIAM MICHAEL McCANN [#66753], 59, of San Jose was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 19, 2008.
The State Bar Court review department agreed with a hearing judge's findings that McCann forged documents, failed to keep clients informed about developments in their cases and made misrepresentations to a bar investigator, but it increased the level of discipline.
He was hired to represent a minor who had been in a traffic accident.
July 19, 2008
WILLIAM MICHAEL McCANN [#66753], 59, of San Jose was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with an actual 60-day suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect July 19, 2008.
The State Bar appealed a hearing judge’s recommended discipline, which did not include an actual suspension, and asked for a three-month actual suspension. The review department took into consideration McCann’s 30 years of discipline-free practice and settled on a 60-day actual suspension.
The hearing judge found that he committed forgery, failed to keep clients reasonably informed of significant developments and made misrepresentations to a State Bar investigator.
In a personal injury case, he represented a minor whose medical expenses were paid by Blue Cross of California through an ERISA-qualified plan. Blue Cross hired The Rawlings Co. to obtain reimbursement for those benefits.
McCann did not respond to Rawlings’ notice of a lien and he believed that Blue Cross did not have a valid lien against any recovery. The lien amounted to $831.85.
When the case settled for $4,500, McCann endorsed the settlement check on behalf of Rawlings Co. for Blue Cross, knowing his clients were anxious to receive their money. He later received another lien notice but did not respond. When a Rawlings representative called McCann about the settlement check, he responded that he had “implied authority” to sign it. Although he attempted to pay part of the amount owed and then the full amount, his checks were returned.
He told a State Bar investigator that he had verbal authorization to endorse the check and said he thought the matter was resolved when he offered to fully reimburse Rawlings.
The review panel agreed with a hearing judge’s findings that McCann committed forgery, failed to keep his clients reasonably informed and made misrepresentations to a bar investigator, committing an act of moral turpitude. However, it disagreed with the judge’s belief that McCann acted in good faith because he believed the lien was invalid. That belief, the panel said, did not justify forgery.
“McCann consciously took the risk and forged Rawlings’ name in order to get the money to his impoverished clients quickly,” wrote Judge Madge Watai. His “good intentions,” she added, did not trump his dishonesty.
McCann has no prior record of discipline in 30 years of practice.
Start New Search »