https://www.cnetscandal.com/search/label/Times%20of%20Terror/

18 U.S. Code § 1511.Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

My coffee friend Susan Kennedy and her former Cellmate Susan Polk 



https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1511

18 U.S. Code § 1511.Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

prev | next
(a)It shall be unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to obstruct the enforcement of the criminal laws of a State or political subdivision thereof, with the intent to facilitate an illegal gambling business if—
(1)
one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of such a conspiracy;
(2)
one or more of such persons is an official or employee, elected, appointed, or otherwise, of such State or political subdivision; and
(3)
one or more of such persons conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an illegal gambling business.
(b)As used in this section—
(1)illegal gambling business” means a gambling business which—
(i)
is a violation of the law of a State or political subdivision in which it is conducted;
(ii)
involves five or more persons who conduct, finance, manage, supervise, direct, or own all or part of such business; and
(iii)
has been or remains in substantially continuous operation for a period in excess of thirty days or has a gross revenue of $2,000 in any single day.
(2)
gambling” includes but is not limited to pool-selling, bookmaking, maintaining slot machines, roulette wheels, or dice tables, and conducting lotteries, policy, bolita or numbers games, or selling chances therein.
(3)
State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.
(c)
This section shall not apply to any bingo game, lottery, or similar game of chance conducted by an organization exempt from tax under paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if no part of the gross receipts derived from such activity inures to the benefit of any private shareholder, member, or employee of such organization, except as compensation for actual expenses incurred by him in the conduct of such activity.
(d)
Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.
Share:

Outsourced UCSF workers sue state Regents (nomoreh1b.blogspot.com)



Clipped from:
https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/05/30/outsourced-ucsf-workers-sue-state-regents/


Outsourced UCSF workers sue state regents
Robert Harrison, a senior telecom analyst, makes his way to the parking lot with his box of belongings on his last day of work at UC San Francisco offices in San Francisco, Calif. on Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2017. Information tech employees from UCSF have lost their jobs to lower-paid tech workers from an outsourcing firm out of India. Harrison was among 13 former employees suing the state. (Laura A. Oda/Bay Area News Group)

By LOUIS HANSEN | lhansen@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group
PUBLISHED: May 30, 2017 at 1:35 p.m. | UPDATED: May 31, 2017 at 4:52 a.m.
A group of former UC San Francisco information technology workers on Tuesday sued the state, claiming discrimination and harassment when they were forced to train lower-cost foreign workers to replace them.

Thirteen former employees charge in a suit filed against the University of California Board of Regents that they were laid off because of their age, sex, race, or national origin. UCSF administrators eliminated about 100 IT positions in February, sending most of the responsibilities to Indian workers through a contract with HCL Technologies, an outsourcing firm. UCSF supervisors told the U.S. workers the layoffs would save the university $30 million over five years.

UCSF is believed to be the first public university in the country to outsource a large number of IT jobs, a common practice in the private sector. Lawmakers criticized the UC system for replacing U.S. workers with foreign replacements.

The criticism grew louder last month as state auditors discovered the UC Office of the President had tallied $175 million in undisclosed discretionary and restricted funds.

Gary Gwilliam, attorney for the former employees, said the university mistreated the workers and misused the visa system in the process. The suit claims foreign workers on H-1B visas were brought in for the project, although the university has denied the charge.

“This is not just outsourcing as usual,” he said. “These are public funds. I don’t think a university should outsource this.”

In a statement, UCSF said IT costs have tripled between 2011 and 2016, largely due to the expansion of electronic medical records.

“This growth rate is not sustainable,” it said.

The university said its various missions — including medical research, quality care and serving poor communities — must be cost-conscious.

The office of UC President Janet Napolitano did not return a request for comment.

The suit, filed in Alameda County Superior Court, said workers were unfairly singled out for cost-cutting. All of the workers in the suit are over 40 years old and have decades of experience in information technology. One man worked at UCSF for 31 years, and several others worked at the university for more than a decade.

UCSF administrators summoned IT workers to a meeting in July and announced it would be outsourcing about one-fifth of its work to HCL Industries.

Administrators cut 97 positions, including 49 career employees, 30 contractors and 18 vacant jobs, according to the suit. The last of the laid off workers left UCSF at the end of February.

“Many of the terminated employees were forced to go through the indignity of training their significantly younger, male HCL replacements, to enable them to perform the work in India,” the suit said.

UCSF is one of 10 campuses in the California system, and offers graduate degrees in medicine and related fields. The medical center offers care to poor and under-served communities. UCSF has an annual budget of about $5.9 billion, and spends about two-thirds of its funds on salaries and benefits.

Gwilliam said workers were outraged after hearing the office of the president — a department not directly related to UCSF — had collected a large surplus.

“What’s going on here?” Gwilliam said. “It’s very disturbing.”


By Louis Hansen | lhansen@bayareanewsgroup.com | Bay Area News Group


PUBLISHED: May 30, 2017 at 1:35 p.m. | UPDATED: May 31, 2017 at 4:52 a.m.
Share:

Contra Costa Flaws

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Ad Home

Follow Us

No one has ever become poor by giving, Please Donate

Flickr Images

Featured

javascript:void(0)
Powered by Blogger.

Comments

Search This Blog

Find Us On Facebook

Random Posts

Recent Posts

Header Ads

BlogRoll

Labels