The Anatomy of Public Corruption

Showing posts with label The State Bar of California. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The State Bar of California. Show all posts

The Witness Murders in the matter of Bennett vs. Southern Pacific

The Corporate Powers

From Hostile Takeovers to Dead CEO's International Transnational Gangs

Steve Burd

Mr. Burd well known to Pete Bennett, Larry Ellison, KKR, Cerberus Capital and Albertsons

Cynthia Kempf

Mr. Kempf, managed the Pittsburg Store. She was one of several store managers. She was just becoming friends with Pete Bennett and his girlfriend, visited our shop and helped store designs by helping with fixture repairs and replacements

BennettvsSouthernpacific.com

Pete Bennett vendor to Safeway Stores suffered life changing accident on SP Track sued nit knowing his customers CEO Steve Burd was a major stock holder of Southern Pacific

Mainframe Designs Cabinets & Fixtures

The Praying Mantis preparing to strike

The Pelosi Files

The shop was located in Camp Stoneman.

BEGINING TO SURVIVE

Share:

The Dead Witnesses of Contra Costa - The State Bar Rules are broken and useless

The Dead Witnesses of Contra Costa

A 1989 Witness Murder, Bennett v. Southern Pacific, Fremont Group, District Attorney Mark Peterson and JonBenet Ramsey
The Press Release 
Fremont Partners
Share:

Mark Thomas Boehme #123921

Attorney Profile

Mark Thomas Boehme #123921

License Status: Inactive 

Address: 286 Carlisle Way, Benicia, CA 94510-1529

Phone: 707-652-4940 | Fax: Not Available

Email: theboehmes@comcast.net | Website: Not Available

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Inactive
12/31/2018 Inactive
8/11/1986 Admitted to the State Bar of California

Additional Information:

Share:

Andrew Charles Schwartz #64578

Attorney Profile

Andrew Charles Schwartz #64578

License Status: Active

Address: Casper Meadows & Schwartz, 2121 N California Bl #1020, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Phone: 925-947-1147  |  Fax: 925-947-1131

Email: schwartz@cmslaw.com  |  Website: www.cmslaw.com

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Active    
6/27/1975 Admitted to the State Bar of California

Additional Information:

Share:

Case CIVMSN05-0778 - DANIEL HOROWITZ VS. JOSEPH LYNCH

 Case CIVMSN05-0778 - DANIEL HOROWITZ VS. JOSEPH LYNCH



Case CIVMSN05-0778 - Complaints/Parties

Complaint Number:1
Complaint Type:CIVIL PETITION
Filing Date:06/15/2005
Complaint Status:ACTIVE
Party NumberParty TypeParty NameAttorneyParty Status
PETITIONER DANIEL HOROWITZ  Pro Per  
PETITIONER PAMELA VITALE  Pro Per  
DEFENDANT JOSEPH W LYNCH  Unrepresented Serve Required (WaitS) 


Case CIVMSN05-0778 - Actions/Minutes

Viewed
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
 06/25/2019 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 10/17/2005 COPIES  Not Applicable   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 06/23/2005 1:35 PM DEPT. 59 HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY DANIEL HOROWITZ & P VITALE  DROPPED BY COURT   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 06/23/2005 1:30 PM DEPT. 59 HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY DANIEL HOROWITZ & P VITALE  NOT HEARD/CONT   
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 06/15/2005 HEARING ON OSC/TRO CIVIL HARASSMENT WAS SET FOR 6/23/05 AT 13:30 IN DEPT. 59     
 06/15/2005 CASE ENTRY COMPLETE Not Applicable   
 06/15/2005 COLOR OF FILE IS BLUE  Not Applicable   
 06/15/2005 PETITION OF DANIEL HOROWITZ & PAMELA VITALE FOR INJUNCTION PROHIBITING HARASSMENT AND APPLICATION FOR TRO FILED  Not Applicable   




Case CIVMSN05-0778 - Pending Hearings

Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings
Share:

Rule 3-400 Limiting Liability to Client


Rule 3-400 Limiting Liability to Client

Rules of Professional Conduct

Rule 3-400 Limiting Liability to Client

A member shall not:
    (A) Contract with a client prospectively limiting the member's liability to the client for the member's professional malpractice; or
    (B) Settle a claim or potential claim for the member's liability to the client for the member's professional malpractice, unless the client is informed in writing that the client may seek the advice of an independent lawyer of the client's choice regarding the settlement and is given a reasonable opportunity to seek that advice.
Discussion:
Rule 3-400 is not intended to apply to customary qualifications and limitations in legal opinions and memoranda, nor is it intended to prevent a member from reasonably limiting the scope of the member's employment or representation. (Amended by order of Supreme Court, operative September 14, 1992.)

Share:

Case CIVMSC08-02838 - BENNETT & JOHNSON VS CITY OF CONCORD

Amazing seeing my former counsel suing for fraud.  Bennett & Johnson represented Pete Bennett in Bennett v. Southern Pacific. 



Case CIVMSC08-02838 - BENNETT & JOHNSON VS CITY OF CONCORD


Case CIVMSC08-02838 - Complaints/Parties

Complaint Number:1
Complaint Type:COMPLAINT
Filing Date:11/12/2008
Complaint Status:DISMISS W/O PREJ. 12/26/2008
Party NumberParty TypeParty NameAttorneyParty Status
PLAINTIFF BENNETT & JOHNSON,LLP BENNETT, RICHARD C DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12/26/2008 
PLAINTIFF RICHARD C BENNETT  BENNETT, RICHARD C DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12/26/2008 
PLAINTIFF WILLIAM C JOHNSON  BENNETT, RICHARD C DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12/26/2008 
DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD Unrepresented DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12/26/2008 
DEFENDANT QUEST DISCOVERY SERVICES, INC. Unrepresented DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12/26/2008 


Case CIVMSC08-02838 - Actions/Minutes

Viewed
Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
 04/28/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. 07 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE VACATED   
 01/16/2009 7:00 AM DEPT. 07 CHECK FOR PROOF OF SERVICE VACATED   
 12/26/2008 REQUEST FILED AND DISMISSAL ENTERED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ENTIRE ACTION Not Applicable N/A 
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 12/24/2008 5CMC4 CALENDARED ON 04/28/09 IN DEPT. 22. HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 04/28/09 IN DEPT. 07.  Not Applicable   
 12/24/2008 5OPSC4 CALENDARED ON 01/16/09 IN DEPT. 22. HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 01/16/09 IN DEPT. 07.  Not Applicable   
 12/23/2008 5:20 PM DEPT. 07 DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 22 TO 07.  Not Applicable   
 11/12/2008 CASE ENTRY COMPLETE Not Applicable   
 11/12/2008 ORIGINAL SUMMONS ON COMPLAINT FILED 11/12/2008 OF BENNETT & JOHNSON,LLP FILED  Not Applicable N/A 
 11/12/2008 COLOR OF FILE IS GREEN  Not Applicable   
 11/12/2008 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WAS SET FOR 4/28/09 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 22     
 11/12/2008 CLERK`S TICKLER TO CHECK FOR PROOF OF SERVICE WAS SET FOR 1/16/09 AT 7:00 IN DEPT. 22     
 11/12/2008 COMPLAINT FILED. SUMMONS IS ISSUED  Not Applicable N/A 
    Minutes
    You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099 
 11/12/2008 CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO DEPT. 22     




Case CIVMSC08-02838 - Pending Hearings

Date
Action Text
Disposition
Image
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings

Share:

Matthew Philip Harrington #76693

Attorney Licensee Profile

Matthew Philip Harrington #76693

License Status: Active
Address: Hughes Gill Cochrane Tinetti, 2820 Shadelands Dr, Ste 160, Walnut Creek, CA 94598-2525
County: Contra Costa County
Phone Number: (925) 926-1200
Fax Number: (925) 926-1202
Law School: UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA 

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

Below you will find all changes of license status due to both non-disciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

DateLicense StatusDisciplineAdministrative Action
PresentActive
12/21/1977Admitted to The State Bar of California
CLA Sections:None
California Lawyers Association (CLA) is an independent organization and is not part of The State Bar of California.
Share:

Judge Barry P. Goode - The Move Away Prevention Order is Kidnapping

Pete Bennett filed move away prevention order in February 2007,  but Superior Court Clerks stated there wasn't enough time to hear the case or some excuse.  At the Bennett was unaware that his courtroom bailiff would be arrested, convicted by a federal grand jury.

Bennett filed the appropriate papers on time without errors.

The State Bar of California





Barry Goode

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Barry P. Goode (born April 11, 1948) is a judge in Contra Costa County, California, and a former federal judicial nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Early life and education[edit]

A New York native, Goode earned a bachelor's degree magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Kenyon College in 1969. He earned a law degree cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1972.[1]

Professional career[edit]

Goode's first job out of law school was as a special assistant to U.S. Sen. Adlai Stevenson III of Illinois, from 1972 until 1974, when Goode then joined the San Francisco law firm McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen (now Bingham McCutchen), where he rose to become a partner. Throughout his 27-year career at the firm, he specialized in representing large corporations in environmental litigation. He also worked as an adjunct instructor of environmental law at the University of San Francisco.[2] Goode left the firm in 2001 to join California state government.

Nomination to the Ninth Circuit[edit]

President Bill Clinton nominated Goode to the Ninth Circuit on June 24, 1998, to replace Charles Edward Wiggins, who had taken senior status.[3] With the U.S. Senate under Republican control from that point until the end of Clinton's presidency, Goode's nomination languished, with no hearing scheduled or U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee vote for him. Despite the support for him from both of California's senators at that time, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, Goode's nomination was held up by one anonymous senator who had placed a hold on his nomination for unexplained reasons. Clinton renominated Goode on January 26, 1999, and renominated him again on January 3, 2001.[2] On March 19, 2001, however, President George W. Bush withdrew 62 executive and judicial nominations made by Clinton in his final days as president, including that of Goode.[4] Goode's nearly three-year nomination remains one of the single longest federal appeals-court judicial nominations never given a full Senate vote, behind those of Helene WhiteHenry Saad and Terrence Boyle.
In April 2003, President Bush nominated Carlos Bea to the Ninth Circuit seat to which Goode had been nominated. Bea was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in September 2003.[5]

Work for California Gov. Gray Davis[edit]

On February 1, 2001, California Gov. Gray Davis named Goode as his secretary of legal affairs. Goode called the post an "important job," in an interview with the Metropolitan News-Enterprise newspaper in a story that was published on February 2, 2001. "I'm the kind of person who looks forward, not backward," he told the paper, referring to his expired federal judicial nomination.
During his time working for Gray Davis, Goode was the point person during two controversies. One involved a $95 million software contract with Oracle Corporation and Northrop Grumman that state officials rescinded in 2002 after critics charged that it would cost the state millions of dollars instead of generating the promised $100 million in savings.[6] The other controversy involved power generator Duke Energy, which in 2001 was accused of gouging California.[7]

Appointment to current judgeship[edit]

On November 11, 2003, just days before he left office after an unprecedented recall vote, Davis appointed Goode to serve on the Contra Costa County Superior Court.[8] Goode's courtroom is located in Martinez, California, which is the county seat of Contra Costa County.

Personal[edit]

Goode lives in California.[1] Goode has taught environmental law at the University of San Francisco School of Law.[1]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1.  
Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts