The Anatomy of Public Corruption

15th Annual THE WINTER FORUM ON REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITY & PRIVATE FUND INVESTING

Connector: 15th Annual THE WINTER FORUM ON REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITY & PRIVATE FUND INVESTING

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus,

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9
5 ARCH COMPANIES
ABINGTON EMERSON INVESTMENTS
ACACIA CAPITAL CORP.
ACADIA REALTY TRUST
ACCORD GROUP
ACORE CAPITAL
ACRE VALLEY REAL ESTATE CAPITAL
ADAM M. PALLEY ASSOCIATES
ADLER REALTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
ADVISOR
AECOM
AKERMAN SENTERFITT
ALCION REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MASTER FUND
ALCION VENTURES
ALEXANDER FORREST INVESTMENTS,
ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE & MALLORY LLP
ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPANY
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN
ALLIANT CAPITAL
ALPHA INVESTING
ALTUS GROUP
AMCAP INC.
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
AMERICAPITAL COMPANIES
AMHERST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
ANCHORAGE CAPITAL GROUP
ANDELL, INC.
ANGELO, GORDON & CO.
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
ANR SIGNATURE
APPIAN CAPITAL
AQUARIUS EQUIPMENT FINANCE
ARBOR LODGING PARTNERS
ARC CAPITAL PARTNERS
ARCHBELL CAPITAL, LLC
ARDEN GROUP
ARENA INVESTORS LP
ARGOSY REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
ARMANINO
ARMANINO LLP
ARTIS ADVISORS LLC
ASCENTRIS
ATALAYA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
ATK PREMIER PROPERTIES, LLC
AVANATH CAPITAL
AVANATH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
AVANCE CAPITAL
AVENIDA PARTNERS, LLC
AVENUE NORTH
AVISON YOUNG
AVIVA INVESTORS
BACELINE INVESTMENTS
BACELINE INVESTMENTS LLC
BACKSHOP
BAHRAIN MUMTALAKAT HOLDING COMPANY
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH
BANNER REAL ESTATE GROUP
BARD CONSULTING
BARINGS REAL ESTATE ADVISERS
BBG, INC
BDR, INC
BEDFORD PORTFOLIO TEAM
BELAY INVESTMENT GROUP
BENEDICT CANYON EQUITIES
BERKADIA
BIG V CAPITAL LLC
BKM CAPITAL PARTNERS
BLAKE STREET ADVISORS
BLUE TOP CAPITAL
BLUE VISTA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
BLUESTONE COMMUNITIES
BOARD OF NYC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
BOFI FEDERAL BANK
BOLOUR ASSOCIATES
BRANAGH DEVELOPMENT, INC.
BRC ADVISORS
BRIDGE INVESTMENT GROUP PARTNERS
BRIDGE MASON ADVISORS
BRIXTON CAPITAL
BROADSTONE REAL ESTATE, LLC
BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT
BRYAN CAVE LLP
BUCHANAN STREET PARTNERS
BUYOUTS INSIDER, UCG COMPANY
CADENCE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
CADRE
CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST
CALKAIN COMPANIES
CALMWATER CAPITAL
CANYON PARTNERS REAL ESTATE
CAPITAL CROSSING
CAPITAL HALL PARTNERS
CAPITAL MERGER GROUP, INC.
CAPITALSOURCE
CAPSTONE PARTNERS
CARMEL PARTNERS
CASTLELAKE
CBRE
CBRE AMERICAS
CBRE GLOBAL INVESTORS
CBRE/WHITE KNIGHT CAPITAL

CENTENNIAL BANK
CENTERSQUARE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
CFLD US, INC.
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
CHRISTINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CIM GROUP
CIO MAGAZINE
CIRCLE INDUSTRIAL
CIT BANK, N.A.
CITCO CAPITAL SOLUTIONS
CITYVIEW
CIVITAS CAPITAL
CLAREO ADVISORS
CLARION PARTNERS
CLAYMARK CAPITAL, LLC
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN WEALTH ADVISORS
CM&D, INC.
CMA ADJUSTMENTS
CMBS.COM / BACKSHOP
CMR CAPITAL GROUP
CMR INVESTMENTS
CNA ENTERPRISES, INC.
COHNREZNICK
COLLEGEPLACE PARTNERS
COLONY CAPITAL, LLC
COLONY NORTHSTAR
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
COMPASS GREEN LLC
COMPSTAK
COMUNIDAD PARTNERSe
CONTRARIAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
COOLEY LLP
CORETRUST CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
CORTLAND CAPITAL MARK. SERVICES
CORTLAND FUND SERVICES
COSTAR PORTFOLIO STRATEGY
COWLEY REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
CREXI
CROSSHARBOR CAPITAL PARTNERS
CROWDSTREET, INC.
CROWN REALTY & DEVELOPMENT
CRUZAN
CYPRESS COMMUNITIES
CYPRESS OFFICE PROPERTIES
DAKETTA PACIFIC
DALFEN AMERICA CORP
DASMOD & FUNF VENTURES
DBG
DEALPOINT MERRILL
DEUTSCHE BANK
DHD VENTURES
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST
DIVIDEND CAPITAL
DJM CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
DLA PIPER
DMB ASSOCIATES, INC.
DOUGLAS WILSON COMPANIES
DREAM FINDERS HOMES
DUKE REALTY
DUNBAR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
DUNE REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC
EAGLE GROUP, LLC
EAT DRINK AND SLEEP
EDGEWOOD REALTY PARTNERS
EISNERAMPER, LLP
EMMES GROUP OF COMPANIES
ENCORE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
ENDVEST
ENGINE REAL ESTATE, LLC
EPR
EQUITY RESOURCE INVESTMENTS
EQUITYSTAKE
ESI VENTURES
ETHIKA INVESTMENTS, LLC
EVEREST MEDICAL PROPERTIES
EVEREST PROPERTIES
EVERWEST REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
EVOLVE
FAIRVIEW PARTNERS
FARALLON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
FD STONEWATER
FELIX / WEINER CONSULTING GROUP
PCCP, LLC
FENWAY PROPERTIES
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
FIDENT CAPITAL
FIDES CAPITAL PARTNERS
FIELDSTONE HOMES UTAH
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
FORGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
FOURTEENPLUS, LLC
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
GCAP LLC
GEBMAN DEVELOPMENT LLC
GEM EQUITY MARKETS
GEM REALTY CAPITAL, INC.
GENKAI CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CO
GEORGE SMITH PARTNERS
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
GLASSWING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
GLOBAL ATLANTIC FINANCIAL GROUP
GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.
GOLDMAN SACHS
GOLDMAN SACHS REALTY MANAGEMENT
GOLDSTAR GROUP
GOODWIN
GRAYMARK CAPITAL
GREYSTAR
GREEN STREET ADVISORS
GREEN STREET INVESTORS
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
GREENLAW PARTNERS
GREENOAK REAL ESTATE
GRIFFIN CAPITAL
GROSVENOR
GTIS PARTNERS
H.I.G. REALTY PARTNERS
H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS
HACKMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
HALSTATT REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
HANOVER FINANCIAL LLC
HARBOR REAL ESTATE, LLC
HAYMAN ADVISORS
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
HAYS COMPANIES, INC
HC2 CAPITAL, LLC
HENDRICKS COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
HG CAPITAL, LLC
HG PLUS
HIGHLAND REALTY CAPITAL
HILCO REAL ESTATE
HILEMAN COMPANY LLC
HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
HILL PROPERTIES
HINES
HOLLIDAY FENOGLIO FOWLER, L.P
HOUSE PROPERTIES
HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP
HYLANT GROUP
IBORROW
ICO DEVELOPMENT, LLC
IHP CAPITAL PARTNERS
INLAND COMMUNITIES CORP
INLAND INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL, LLC
INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY ADVISORS
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
INTEGRAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
INTEGRATED CAPITAL, LLC
INTEGRATED REALTY ADVISORS
INTEGRITY HOUSING
INTERSTATE EQUITIES
INTERWEST CAPITAL
INVESTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES
INVESTORS CAPITAL GROUP LLC
IRVINE COMPANY
ISLES RANCH PARTNERS
ISTAR
J.P. MORGAN
J.P. MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT
J.W. SHUTE INT'L
JAKE SHARP GROUP
JAMES INVESTMENT PARTNERS
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
JCR CAPITAL
JCRA FINANCIAL LLC
JG PROPERTIES, LLC
JH REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, INC.
JLL
JMB FINANCIAL ADVISORS LLC
KAIROS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
KAJAINE CAPITAL
KASA PROPERTIES INC. 
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
KBS REALTY ADVISORS
KEARNY REAL ESTATE
KELLY INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
KENNEDY WILSON
KETO CAPITAL
KETTLER
KEYSTONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
KILROY REALTY
KKR
KPMG
KSR CAPITAL
LANCASTER POLLARD
LATERRA DEVELOPMENT LLC
LBA REALTY
LBG REAL ESTATE COMPANIES, LLC
LEE & ASSOCIATES
LIBERTY GROUP
LJ CAPITAL PARTNERS
LMC CAPITAL, LLC
LOCAL CONSTRUCT
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
LOMBARD INTERNATIONAL
LONE OAK FUND, LLC
LOS ANGELES CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
LOS ANGELES FIRE AND POLICE PENSIONS

LS CAPITAL, INC.
MADISON MARQUETTE
MAGELLAN VALUE PARTNERS
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS
MANHATTAN HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATES
MARCUM
MARCUS & MILLICHAP
MAR-GULF MANAGEMENT CO. INC.
MARKETSQUARE REAL ESTATE
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES
MARSH USA
MCGUIREWOODS LLP
MCWHINNEY
MEDMEN
MENLO EQUITIES
MERCER
MERIDIAN CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
MERLONE GEIER PARTNERS
MESA WEST CAPITAL, LLC
METRO WASTEWATER RETIREMENT BOARD
MEYERS RESEARCH LLC
MG PROPERTIES
MIDTOWN NATIONAL GROUP
MIDWEST SERVICING INC.
MILLER GLOBAL PROPERTIES, LLC
MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
MONTGOMERY STREET PARTNERS, L.P.
MORGAN STANLEY
MORGAN STANLEY WEALTH MANAGEMENT
MORNING CALM MANAGEMENT
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MOSAIC REAL ESTATE INVESTORS
MOSS ADAMS LLP
MSD CAPITAL
MUFG UNION BANK
MULTIFAMILY INVESTMENTS
NAPA VENTURES
NATIXIS REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLC
NAWRB
NET LEASE CAPITAL ADVISORS
NEW STANDARD EQUITIES
NEW YORK UNIVSERSITY
NEWMARK GRUBB KNIGHT FRANK
NGKF
NOBLE INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC
NOBLE STREET ADVISORS
NOMURA HOLDING AMERICA INC.
NORTHSTAR COMMERCIAL PARTNERS
NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP
NOVARE
OAK PASS CAPITAL
OAK ROAD CAPITAL
OAKTREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP
OAKTREE CAPITAL MGMT LLC
OCERS
OMNINET
ORIGIN INVESTMENTS
OWENS FINANCIAL GROUP
PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL, LLC
PACIFIC REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, INC.
PALADIN REALTY PARTNERS, LLC
PALISADES CAPITAL
PALISADES CAPITAL REALTY ADVISORS
PARAGON COMMERCIAL GROUP
PARMENTER REALTY PARTNERS
PARSE CAPITAL, LLC
PARTNERS CAPITAL SOLUTIONS
PATHFINDER PARTNERS, LLC
PEAK CAPITAL PARTNERS
PEERSTREET
PENINSULA RETAIL PARTNERS
PENSCO TRUST COMPANY
PENWOOD REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC
PEREVIEW SOFTWARE
PERTH ADVISORS
PGIM REAL ESTATE
PHOENIX AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
PHOENIX INVESTORS, LLC
PHOENIX REALTY GROUP
PILOT CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC
PIMCO
PIRCHER, NICHOLS & MEEKS
POLSINELLI
PONTUS CAPITAL
POST BROTHERS
PRAELIUM COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
PRICE DEVELOPMENT GROUP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP
PROSKAUER
PT DEVELOPMENT CO
PWC
QUANTINAL CAPITAL ADVISORS
QUIETSTREAM FINANCIAL, LLC
QUIKSILVER HOTELS & RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
RAD URBAN
RAF PACIFICA GROUP
RALLIPOINT, LLC
RAM REAL ESTATE CAPITAL
RANDOLPH STREET REALTY CAPITAL
RAVINIA CAPITAL GROUP
RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
RCLCO REAL ESTATE ADVISORS
REALCROWD
REALPAGE, INC.
REALTYMOGUL.COM
REALTYSHARES
REDHILL REALTY INVESTORS
REDIRECT CONSULTING
REDIRECT INC.
REGENT PROPERTIES
RELATED FUND MANAGEMENT
RENASCI DEVELOPMENT
REVEN HOUSING REIT
REVERE CAPITAL, LLC
RHODE ISLAND COMMERCE CORPORATION
RIALTO CAPITAL
RISING REALTY PARTNERS
RMA REAL ESTATE ADVISORS
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
ROBINSON DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ROCKWOOD CAPITAL LLC
ROPES & GRAY LLP
ROYALTON PARTNERS
RRA CAPITAL
RUSSELL INVESTMENTS
S&P GLOBAL MARKET INTELLIGENCE
SABAL FINANCIAL GROUP
SAKER CAPITAL LTD.
SALEM PARTNERS, LLC
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSN
SANDSTONE PROPERTIES
SARES REGIS GROUP
SCHNITZER WEST, LLC
SEA BREEZE PROPERTIES
SECURITY PROPERTIES INC.
SEMINOLE FINANCIAL SERVICES
SENTINEL DEVELOPMENT
SEWARD & KISSEL LLP
SHAMROCK HOLDINGS
SHOPOFF REALTY INVESTMENTS L.P.
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
SILICON ALLEE
SILVERWEST HOTELS
SINGERMAN REAL ESTATE
SINGPOLI CAPITAL CORPORATION
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
SLH INVESTMENTS
SOWER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
SPIRIT INVESTMENT PARTNERS
SQUAR MILNER LLP
SQUARE MILE CAPITAL
SRS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
STARWOOD CPG OPERATIONS LLC
STEPSTONE GROUP REAL ESTATE LP
STILL REAL ESTATE
STONEBRIDGE COMPANIES
STORAGE OF AMERICA
STRADA INVESTMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS
STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS
STRATEGIC HOLDINGS
STRATEGIC PARTNERS
STREIT LENDING
STS CAPITAL PARTNERS
SUMMERS GROUP INVESTORS
SUNCAL
SUNRISE MANAGEMENT
SVN AUCTIONWORKS
TA REALTY
TARGET ROCK PARTNERS
TARLTON PROPERTIES
TAVACO PROPERTIES, LLC
TAYLOR DERRICK CAPITAL
TEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
TEN-X
TERRA CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
TEXTRON AVIATION
TH REAL ESTATE
THE ABBEY COMPANY
THE ARDENT COMPANIES
THE BASCOM GROUP, LLC
THE BENDETTI COMPANY
THE BLACKSTONE GROUP
THE CARLYLE GROUP
THE CONCORD GROUP, LLC
THE FESTIVAL COMPANIES
THE HERITAGE GROUP
THE MAGELLAN GROUP, INC.
THE MCLEAN GROUP
THE MERIDIAN GROUP
THE MULLER COMPANY
THE OLSON COMPANY
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES
THE PELORUS FUND
THE ROXBOROUGH GROUP, LLC
THE WOLFF COMPANY
THOR EQUITIES
TIAA
TITAN DEVELOPMENT
TITLEVIEW
TOLL BROTHERS, INC
TORREY CAPITAL GROUP
TORREY PINES BANK
TPG REAL ESTATE FINANCE
TPG SPECIAL SITUATIONS PARTNERS
TREBOL REAL ESTATE
TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS
TRION PROPERTIES
TRIUMPH CAPITAL PARTNERS
TRIUMPH PROPERTIES GROUP
TRUAMERICA MULTIFAMILY, LLC
TURNER DEVELOPMENT
TURNSTONE GROUP LLC
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
UNC MANAGEMENT COMPANY
UNION BANK
UNITED AMERICAN PROPERTIES, INC.
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY (UMKC) SCHOOL OF LAW
URBANA REALTY ADVISORS
V CHECK GLOBAL
VARDE PARTNERS
VENETO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
VENTURECORE CAPITAL
VERSA CAPITAL, INC.
VIC PARTNERS, LLC
VIRGIN HOTELS
VOYA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
WALKER & DUNLOP
WALTON STREET CAPITAL, LLC
WASHINGTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
WATERTON ASSOCIATES LLC
WATT COMPANIES
WD LAND
WELLER PARTNERS LLP
WELLS FARGO
WEST BAY CAPITAL
WESTBROOK PARTNERS, LLC
WESTERN AND SOUTHERN INS
WESTERN AVENUE CAPITAL
WESTPORT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON
WINDSOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
WNW CAPITAL INC.
WOODBRIDGE PACIFIC GROUP
WOODBURY CORPORATION
YARDI SYSTEMS
YR
ZEPHYR PARTNERS
ZHUGUANG PROPERTIES US
ZISLER CAPITAL ASSOCIATES
Share:

Essex Property Trust and BRE Properties / Real Estate Trusts in $4.34 Billion Merger

Connecting Essex Property Trust  Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project



The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2








Real Estate Trusts in $4.34 Billion Merger



Essex Property Trust, a residential real estate investment trust with a strong California presence, has agreed to acquire another West Coast residential REIT, BRE Properties, for $4.34 billion.
The merger would create the “only publicly traded West Coast pure play multifamily REIT,” with properties in the lucrative – thanks to the technology industry – rental markets of San Francisco and Seattle, among others.
Essex, based in Palo Alto, Calif., has ownership interests in 163 multifamily properties as well as in an additional 11 properties in various stages of development. BRE, based in San Francisco, owns 75 multifamily communities (totaling 21,396 homes) and has a joint venture interest in an additional apartment community (totaling 252 homes).
“By combining the strengths of the two platforms, which have a significant geographic overlap, we expect to realize operating efficiencies and further enhance our growth profile,” Michael Schall, Essex’s chief executive, said in a statement.
Under the terms of the deal, each common share of BRE will be converted into 0.2971 of a newly issued share of Essex common stock plus $12.33 in cash, or about $56.21 a share. The terms are the same as when the two companies disclosed on Dec. 9 that they were in merger talks.  Essex says it has obtained committed financing of $1 billion for the deal.
UBS advised Essex and provided half of the bridge financing. Goodwin Procter acted as legal adviser. Citigroup acted as financial adviser and as administrative agent of the bridge facility.
Wells Fargo and the law firm Latham & Watkins advised BRE.
Share:

The Life and Times of JFK, Jr.

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9

The Life and Times of JFK, Jr.

July 16 marks the anniversary of Kennedy's tragic plane crash

by Beth Rowen
John F. Kennedy, Jr.
John F. Kennedy, Jr., and his wife, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, died in a small plane on July 16, 1999.

The Kennedys

Related Links

July 16 marks the anniversary of the death of John F. Kennedy, Jr., his wife, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, and Carolyn's sister, Lauren, who perished on their way to Martha's Vineyard, when their plane, piloted by Kennedy, crashed.
The National Transportation Safety Board, after a lengthy investigation, concluded that Kennedy suffered from spatial disorientation, a condition that arises from a loss of balance in the inner ear and causes confusion. Kennedy's problems were exacerbated by the hazy night sky and his inability to see the horizon. The NTSB also said investigators did not find any mechanical problems with Kennedy's plane, a Piper Saratoga II.
In death, Kennedy was the subject of the same media frenzy that chronicled his every public move and speculated on his private affairs as well. Television networks preempted regularly scheduled programs to cover the search for remains and the wreckage of Kennedy's aircraft, which Kennedy purchased in April.

First Infant in the White House

Kennedy was born on November 25, 1960, only weeks after his father was elected president. He was the first child born to a president-elect and the first infant to live in the White House since the Cleveland administration. Three years later, the world watched as the three year-old, on his birthday, saluted his father's casket as it passed by. Two weeks after the funeral, his mother, Jacqueline Kennedy, moved John, Jr., and his sister, Caroline, out of the White House to Manhattan, where she made every attempt to raise her children as normally as possible, out of the public eye. "Unless he's allowed freedom," his mother said, "he'll be a vegetable."

Influence of Jacqueline Kennedy

With all her influence and grace, Jacqueline Kennedy could not tame the media. Nevertheless, she did succeed in raising two children that matured into compassionate, responsible, independent adults. Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg has maintained a much more private life. Rich, handsome, polite, and charismatic, John Jr., was too much for the media to resist.

Prestigious Schools, Failed Hopes

Kennedy attended Manhattan's Collegiate School for Boys and graduated from the elite Phillips Academy in Andover. Unlike many of the Kennedy men who attended Harvard, John went to Brown University, graduating in 1983. After flirting with an acting career, John enrolled in New York University's Law School, a move many now say was motivated by his mother's wishes. He failed the bar twice, prompting tabloids to call him the "hunk who flunked."

"Sexiest Man Alive"

In 1988, People magazine dubbed him the "Sexiest Man Alive." When he introduced his uncle, presidential hopeful Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, at the 1988 Democratic National Convention, pundits speculated that John, Jr., was readying himself for a run for office. Instead, he went to work as a prosecutor for the Manhattan District Attorney. After amassing an impressive 6–0 record from 1989 to 1993, he resigned.

Publishing, Not Politics

While never outright ruling out a run for political office, Kennedy told Vogue magazine, "I frankly feel there are many opportunities and avenues outside of elective office to become involved in issues, issues that have the same broad scope that government or elected office provides you."
The avenue Kennedy chose was publishing. In 1995 he launched George magazine, a glossy, non-partisan political journal subtitled "not just politics as usual." In addition to his duties as editor, he wrote essays and conducted interviews, which included discussions with Mike Tyson and Fidel Castro. In a 1997 essay, Kennedy called his cousins Michael and Joseph, who suffered personal embarrassments in the public eye, "poster boys for bad behavior."
While he led a life under intense media scrutiny, Kennedy did not give the press much fodder. Aside from a few public spats with his wife, Carolyn, a former Calvin Klein executive, Kennedy kept an essentially low profile. A passionate philanthropist, Kennedy volunteered with several nonprofits and sat on the boards of several family foundations. He was often seen inline skating around his TriBeCa neighborhood, jogging in Central Park, or out and about in Hyannis Port, where the Kennedy family gathers in the summer.

Share:

Oracle the Smoracle on PBS with Pete Bennett (June 2007

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9

Press Release

<< Back
Sohaib Abbasi, Stephen Elop, and Jeffrey Tarr join TPG as Senior Advisors
Fort Worth, Texas, and San  Francisco – February 8, 2019 – TPG, a global alternative asset firm, today  announced the appointments of Sohaib Abbasi, Stephen Elop, and Jeffrey Tarr as  Senior Advisors to the firm's technology group. Together, Abbasi, Elop, and  Tarr bring decades of leadership experience in distinct areas of technology. In  their roles, they will advise TPG on its portfolio and investment activities  within the sector.
"From disruptors to established  entities, we strive to partner with innovative companies and management teams  that are driving change across industries," said Nehal Raj, Partner and Head of  Technology Investing at TPG. "The additions of Sohaib, Stephen, and Jeff better  position us to execute on our strategy across the full technology ecosystem.  Combined with our existing network, they bring valuable support and insight to  our team, and build on the strength, depth, and expertise of TPG's technology  practice."
Abbasi has more than 30 years of  experience in enterprise software, most recently serving as Chairman and CEO of  Informatica. Prior to Informatica, Abbasi served as a member of Oracle's  Executive Committee and Senior Vice President of its Tools Products and  Education Services divisions. Abbasi currently serves on the Boards of McAfee,  Red Hat, New Relic, and StreamSets.
Elop has a robust professional  background with more than 20 years of experience spanning enterprise software  and smart devices. Most recently, Elop served as Group Executive of Technology,  Innovation and Strategy at Telstra. Prior to this, Elop was the Executive Vice  President of the Microsoft Devices Group, and before that, President and  CEO of Nokia. Elop has held other executive roles at Juniper Networks, Adobe  Systems, and Macromedia.
Tarr has significant experience  leading data and information-intensive businesses and has built three  publicly-traded companies into industry leaders. Throughout his career he has  served as the CEO of DigitalGlobe, President and COO of IHS (now IHS Markit)  and Chairman and CEO of Hoover's (now a division of D&B). He currently serves  as Vice Chair of the Stanford Graduate School of Business Management Board, and  as Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum Global Future Council on Space  Technologies.
Abbasi, Elop, and Tarr join TPG's  strong roster of senior advisors to the technology sector. Existing members  include Dan Dershem (supply chain); David Karnstedt (marketing tech); Afshin  Mohebbi (telecom); Carl Pascarella (payments); Ameet Patel (infrastructure);  and Tony Reisz (insurance tech). TPG's technology team works across TPG Capital,  TPG Growth, and The Rise Fund.
 Supporting Quotes 
  • "Within technology and other industries, TPG has long been recognized for its constructive partnerships with management teams," said Abbasi. "I value this approach and I am excited to work with TPG and the teams across its portfolio to help grow their businesses."
  •  
  • "TPG's technology portfolio includes market-leading companies from diverse areas of the industry's ecosystem, creating an expansive and unique platform from which to drive value," said Elop. "I'm thrilled to be a part of TPG's network and look forward to working with the team to identify new and exciting investment opportunities."
  •  
  • "TPG's network, sector expertise, and differentiated investment approach has made the firm a leading partner for some of today's fastest-growing technology companies," said Tarr. "Together, we will seek investments where technology can be leveraged to unlock new value from data-rich companies."
About TPG
TPG is a leading global alternative  asset firm founded in 1992 with more than $103 billion of assets under  management and offices in Austin, Beijing, Boston, Dallas, Fort Worth,  Hong Kong, Houston, London, Luxembourg, Melbourne, Moscow, Mumbai, New York San Francisco, Seoul, and Singapore. TPG's investment platforms are across a  wide range of asset classes, including private equity, growth venture, real  estate, credit, and public equity. TPG aims to build dynamic products and  options for its investors while also instituting discipline and operational excellence  across the investment strategy and performance of its portfolio. For more  information, visit www.tpg.com.
Share:

TPG, Rockbridge Growth look to sell stakes in AXS: Wall Street Journal

Connecting TPG Deals to Bennett to Anschutz Entertainment Group and Santa Fe Pipeline Partners linked to the Kinder Morgan Explosion linked to deaths of my friend and daughter

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9

TPG, Rockbridge Growth look to sell stakes in AXS: Wall Street Journal

Share:

Dickinson v. Southern Pacific Co - Same Story Death by Law, the Glory of the win all the way to the gory end

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9

Dickinsonv.

Southern Pacific Co.

Supreme Court of CaliforniaJun 9, 1916
172 Cal. 727 (Cal. 1916)
172 Cal. 727158 P. 183
Action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff's intestate. The defendants are  railway corporations, the one owning and the other operating under lease a line of steam railway running through the city of Bakersfield. A train of said line ran into a buggy which the decedent, Samuel Dickinson, was driving, and Dickinson was instantly killed.
Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff for $10,230. From this judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, the defendants appeal.
There is no room to doubt that the evidence warranted the jury in finding that there had been negligence in the operation of the train. The appellants contend, however, that the decedent was himself guilty of contributory negligence, and that for this reason their motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.
Chester Avenue, the street upon which Samuel Dickinson was driving, runs north and south in the city of Bakersfield. It is intersected at right angles by Thirty-third Street. The railway track runs in an easterly and westerly direction and crosses Chester Avenue at Thirty-third Street. The trains coming over the track toward Bakersfield approach from the west. At Chester Avenue there are three tracks; a main line and two sidings. The main line is the most southerly, and it was upon this track that the train which struck Dickinson was running. Dickinson was coming along Chester Avenue from the north. The accident occurred in the daytime. The appellants rely upon the rule, well established by many decisions of this court, that the track of a steam railway is in itself "a sign of danger, and one intending to cross must avail himself of every opportunity to look and listen for approaching trains." ( Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co., 121 Cal. 228, [53 P. 651]; Holmes v. South Pacific Coast Ry. Co., 97 Cal. 161, 167, [31 P. 834]; Green v. Los Angeles etc. Ry. Co., 143 Cal. 31, 37, [101 Am. St. Rep. 6876 P. 719]; Hutson v. Southern Cal. Ry. Co., 150 Cal. 701, 704, [ 89 P. 1093]; Griffin v. San Pedro etc. Ry. Co., 170 Cal. 772, [L. R. A. 1916A, 842, 151 P. 282].) Of course, where the circumstances are such that the injured person could not, by the exercise of his faculties of sight and hearing, have discovered the approach of a train in time to avoid injury, his failure to look or to listen will not preclude recovery. ( Martin v. Southern Pacific Co., 150 Cal. 124, [ 88 P. 701]; Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co., 22 Cal.App. 461,
 [ 134 P. 801].) Whether the case be one in which the conditions force the conclusion that the injured person did not exercise reasonable care for his own safety, or be one in which it is open to a jury to find either way on the issue of contributory negligence, is sometimes a close question. In Griffin v. San Pedro etc. Ry. Co., 170 Cal. 772, [L. R. A. 1916A, 842, 151 P. 282], it was held by a majority of the court that the case fell within the first category, but there was a division of opinion on the point. The case at bar presents a situation somewhat similar to that before the court in the Griffin case. On the northwesterly corner of Chester Avenue and Thirty-third Street was an ice plant, and the noise of the machinery operated in this plant made it difficult, if not impossible, to hear approaching trains. On the southerly side of this building was an ice-loading rack, and this, together with two freight-cars which were standing on the most northerly of the three tracks and extending well into Chester Avenue, obstructed the view of one approaching the crossing until he was almost on the second of the three tracks. We do not find it necessary to decide whether the evidence in this case was such as to compel the conclusion that the deceased, after reaching the point at which he had a view along the main track, would still, by the exercise of reasonable care, have been able to stop his horse and thus avoid a collision. The judgment must be reversed on a different ground, and as the evidence may not be precisely the same on a second trial, we think it better to leave the court below unhampered in passing upon the question whether contributory negligence is, at such trial, established as a matter of law.
One of the grounds upon which reversal is sought is that the damages awarded are excessive. In addition to the recovery sought on account of the death of Samuel Dickinson, the plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he had suffered a loss of $230 through destruction of the horse, the harness, and the buggy. The verdict was for $10,230. Plainly, ten thousand dollars of this sum was awarded for the death of plaintiff's intestate.
It appeared in the evidence that at the time of the accident Samuel Dickinson was of the age of seventy-eight years and nine months. He was survived by a wife, two sons, two daughters, and eight grandchildren. One of the grandchildren was living with Samuel Dickinson and his wife.  Dickinson's occupation was that of a farmer. The only evidence of his earnings in that calling was that of the plaintiff, his son, who testified that the income of the decedent from his farm was one thousand dollars a year, and that the rental value of a place like that which he occupied would be about three hundred dollars a year. This left a return, from his labor and personal efforts, of seven hundred dollars per year, but this, as the witness testified, did not take into account any deduction for living expenses. The widow testified that her husband had been in good health and able to do a good day's work, that her life with him was pleasant, his habits good, and his companionship pleasant and agreeable.
There was no evidence offered to show the expectancy of life of a man of Dickinson's age. The courts may, however, take judicial notice of the mortality tables in common use. ( Gordon v. Tweedy, 74 Ala. 232, [49 Am. Rep. 813]; Louisvilleetc. Co. v. Miller, 141 Ind. 533, [37 N.E. 343]; Atchison etc. Co. v. Ryan, 62 Kan. 682, [64 P. 603].) An examination of such tables shows that Samuel Dickinson's expectancy of life was about four and eight-tenths years.
This being the showing, the award of ten thousand dollars was palpably in excess of any sum which the jury was authorized to find as the damage resulting to the heirs of Samuel Dickinson by reason of his death.
The action is based on section 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At common law no remedy was given for injuries causing death. The right of the survivors to recover in such cases is purely statutory. It is thoroughly settled by many decisions in this state and elsewhere that a plaintiff, suing under a statute like section 377, "does not represent the right of action which the deceased would have had if the latter had survived the injury, but can recover only for the pecuniary loss suffered by the plaintiff [or the heirs represented by him] on account of the death of the relative; that sorrow and mental anguish caused by the death are not elements of damage; and that nothing can be recovered as a solatium for wounded feelings." ( Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co., 95 Cal. 516, [29 Am. St. Rep. 143, 17 L. R. A. 71, 30 P. 603], and cases cited; Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging Co., 84 Cal. 515, [18 Am. St. Rep. 248, 24 P. 303]; Lange v. Schoettler, 115 Cal. 390, [47 P. 139]; Burk v. Arcata M. R. R. Co., 125 Cal. 364, [73 Am. St. Rep. 52, 57 P. 1065]; Sneed v. Marysville Gas Co.,149 Cal. 710, [ 87 P. 376]; Hale v. San Bernardino etc. Co., 156 Cal. 716, [ 106 P. 83]; Diller v. Northern California Power Co., 162 Cal. 536, [Ann. Cas. 1913d 908, 123 P. 359]; Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas etc. Co., 164 Cal. 191, [ 128 P. 330].)
In such cases the jury may consider the relations which existed between the heirs and the deceased during the lifetime of the latter ( Beeson v. Green Mountain etc. Min. Co., 57 Cal. 20), and the loss of comfort, society, support, and protection of the deceased. ( Munro v. Pacific Coast Dredging Co., 84 Cal. 515, [18 Am. St. Rep. 248, 24 P. 303].) But, as is repeatedly declared in our decisions, the loss of comfort and society are to be considered only "with reference to the value of the life of the deceased and the pecuniary loss to the plaintiff caused by the death." ( Morgan v. Southern Pacific Co., 95 Cal. 516, [29 Am. St. Rep. 143, 17 L. R. A. 71, 30 P. 603].) As was said by Temple, J., in Lange v. Schoettler, 115 Cal. 390, [47 P. 139], referring to the element of deprivation of comfort, society, and protection, "it has always been held that this was in strict accordance with the rule that only the pecuniary value of the life to the relatives could be recovered. The probable comfort, society, and protection of the deceased had some pecuniary value." So in Hale v. San Bernardino etc. Co., 156 Cal. 716, [ 106 P. 83], it is stated that "in determining the financial loss to the widow and infant child, resulting from the death of the husband and father, the jury may consider the financial loss accruing from the deprivation of the society, comfort, care, and protection of the deceased, as well as of his support."
It is not possible to measure in exact terms of money the loss which a surviving husband, wife, or child may have sustained through being deprived of the comfort and society of the deceased spouse or parent. For this reason, some play is allowed to the discretion of the jury by the provision of section 377 that such damages may be allowed as under all the circumstances of the case may be just. But in fixing the amount, the jury is always bound by the fundamental rule that pecuniary damage is the limit of recovery, and the amount allowed must bear some reasonable relation to the pecuniary loss shown by the evidence.
 Here, as we have seen, the deceased had a probable expectancy of less than five years of life. His earnings, assuming that they would all have been applied for the benefit of his family, would have amounted to less than three thousand five hundred dollars, during the probable remaining span of his years. The verdict for ten thousand dollars, can, therefore, be sustained only upon the theory that his life, apart from any contributions he might make from his earnings, had a pecuniaryvalue of more than six thousand five hundred dollars to his widow and heirs. There is no evidence to justify such a conclusion. Eliminating, as we must, any consideration of the grief and mental suffering occasioned to the survivors by the death, it is impossible to conceive how the loss of the comfort, society, and protection of the deceased could have had a money value of anything like the amount awarded by the jury. Verdicts have frequently been set aside where the disproportion between the loss proven and the amount awarded was not so great as that which appears here. ( Atlanta W. P. R. R. Co. v. Newton, 85 Ga. 517, [11 S.E. 776]; Taylor v. Long Island Ry. Co., 16 App. Div. 1, [44 N.Y. Supp. 820]; Stillings v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 84 App. Div. 201, [82 N.Y. Supp. 726]; English v. Southern Pacific Co., 13 Utah, 407, [57 Am. St. Rep. 772, 35 L. R. A. 155, 45 P. 47]; Vowell v. Issaquah Coal Co., 31 Wn. 103, [71 P. 725].)
We do not think it necessary to discuss any of the other questions argued in the briefs.
The judgment and the order denying a new trial are reversed.

Hearing in Bank denied.
Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts