The Anatomy of Public Corruption

Connecting Fender Corporation to the TPG Bribery Scandal to Bennett's stolen music gear



Fender Musical Instruments Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation
Formerly
Fender Electric Instrument Manufacturing Company
Private
IndustryMusical instruments
GenreMusic
FoundedFullerton, California, U.S. (1946; 73 years ago)
FounderClarence Leonidas Fender
HeadquartersScottsdale, Arizona, United States
Area served
Worldwide
Key people
Andy Mooney (CEO)[1]
James S. Broenen (CFO)
Evan Jones (CMO)[2]
ProductsElectricacousticresonator & classical guitars
Acoustic & electric bassguitars
Banjos
Mandolins
Ukuleles
Harmonicas
Amplifiers
Effects units
Audio equipment
BrandsFender Custom Shop
Fender Japan
Squier
Gretsch
Jackson
Charvel
EVH
[3]
DivisionsCorona, California (USA) Ensenada, Baja California(Mexico)
Websitefender.com
Fender Musical Instruments Corporation (FMIC, or simply Fender) is an American manufacturer of stringed instruments and amplifiers. Fender produces acoustic guitarselectric bassesbass amplifiers and public addressequipment, but is best known for its solid-body electric guitars and bass guitars, particularly the StratocasterTelecasterPrecision Bass, and the Jazz Bass. The company was founded in Fullerton, California, by Clarence Leonidas "Leo" Fender in 1946. Its headquarters are in Scottsdale, Arizona.
FMIC is a privately held corporation, with Andy Mooney serving as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The company filed for an initial public offering in March 2012,[4] but this was withdrawn[5][6] five months later. In addition to its Scottsdale headquarters, Fender has manufacturing facilities in Corona, California (US) and Ensenada, Baja California (Mexico).[7]
As of July 10, 2012, the majority shareholders of Fender were the private equity firm of Weston Presidio (43%), Japanese music distributors Yamano Music (14%) and Kanda Shokai (13%) and Servco Pacific (5%)[8][9]. In December 2012, TPG Growth (the middle market and growth equity investment platform of TPG Capital) and Servco Pacific took control of the company after acquiring the shares held by Weston Presidio.[10]

History[edit]

In 1950, Fender introduced the first mass-produced solid-body Spanish-style electric guitar, the Telecaster (originally named the Broadcaster for two-pickup models and Esquire for single-pickup).[11] Following its success, Fender created the first mass-produced electric bass, the Precision Bass (P-Bass). In 1954, Fender unveiled the Stratocaster ("Strat") guitar. With the Telecaster and Precision Bass having been on the market for some time, Leo Fender was able to incorporate input from working musicians into the Stratocaster's design.

Origins[edit]


Diagram of Leo Fender's lap steel guitar from 1944 patent application.
The company began as Fender's Radio Service in late 1938 in FullertonCalifornia. As a qualified electronics technician, Fender had repaired radios, phonographs, home audio amplifiers, public address systems and musical instrument amplifiers, all designs based on research developed and released to the public domain by Western Electric in the 1930s using vacuum tubes for amplification. The business also sidelined in carrying records for sale and the in rental of company-designed PA systems. Leo became intrigued by design flaws in contemporary musical instrument amplifiers and began building amplifiers based on his own designs or modifications to designs.
By the early 1940s, Leo Fender had entered into a partnership with Clayton Orr "Doc" Kauffman, and they formed the K & F Manufacturing Corp to design, manufacture, and market electric instruments and amplifiers. Production began in 1945 with Hawaiian lap steel guitars (incorporating a patented pickup) and amplifiers, sold as sets. By the end of the year, Fender became convinced that manufacturing was more profitable than repair, and decided to concentrate on that business instead. Kauffman remained unconvinced, and he and Fender amicably parted ways by early 1946. At that point, Fender renamed the company the Fender Electric Instrument Company. The service shop remained open until 1951, although Leo Fender did not personally supervise it after 1947.
Leo Fender's lap steel guitar made in 1946 for Noel Boggs was probably the very first product of the new company, bearing an early presentation of the cursive "big F" Fender logo.[12]
In the late 1940s, Fender began to experiment with more conventional guitar designs. Early Broadcasters were plagued with issues; while Fender boasted the strength of the instrument's one-piece maple neck, early adopters lamented its tendency to bow in humid weather. Fender's reluctant addition of a metal truss rod into the necks of his guitars allowed for the much needed ability to fine-tune the instrument to the musician's specific needs. With the design of the Telecaster finalized, mass production began in 1950. The Telecaster's bolted-on neck allowed for the instrument's body and neck to be milled and finished separately, and for the final assembling to be done quickly and cheaply by unskilled workers.

The Stratocaster was released in 1954.
In 1959, Fender released the Jazzmaster guitar. Like the Stratocaster before it, the Jazzmaster was a radical departure from previous guitar designs. The offset body, vibrato system and innovative electronics were designed to capture the Jazz guitar market which until then was dominated by acoustic guitars. Fender even promoted the Jazzmaster as a premium successor to the Stratocaster, an accolade it never fully achieved. Despite being shunned by the Jazz community, the guitar found a home in the growing surf rock music scene, one that would go into influence the Jazzmaster's successor, the Jaguar in 1962.

Sale to CBS[edit]

In early 1965, Leo Fender sold his companies to the Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) for $13 million.[13][14] This was almost two million more than they had paid for The New York Yankees a year before. CBS entered the musical instruments field by acquiring the Fender companies (Fender Sales, Inc., Fender Electric Instrument Company, Inc., Fender Acoustic Instrument Company, Inc., Fender-Rhodes, Inc., Terrafen, Inc., Clef-Tronix, Inc., Randall Publishing Co., Inc., and V.C. Squier Company), as well as Electro-Music Inc. (Leslie speakers), Rogers drumsSteinway pianos, Gemeinhardt flutes, Lyon & Healy harps, Rodgers(institutional) organs, and Gulbransen home organs.
The sale was taken as a positive development, considering CBS's ability to bring in money and personnel who acquired a large inventory of Fender parts and unassembled guitars that were assembled and put to market. However, the sale also led to a reduction of the quality of Fender's guitars while under the management of "cost-cutting" CBS. Several cosmetic changes occurred after 1965/1966, such as a larger headstock shape on certain guitars. Bound necks with block shaped position markers were introduced in 1966. A bolder black headstock logo, as well as a brushed aluminum face plate with blue or red labels (depending the model) for the guitar and bass amplifiers became standard features, starting in late 1968. These first "silverface" amps added an aluminium trim detail around the speaker baffle until 1970.
Other cosmetic changes included a new "tailless" Fender amp decal and a sparkling orange grillcloth on certain amplifiers in the mid-1970s. Regarding guitars, in mid-1971 the usual four-bolt neck joint was changed to one using only three bolts, and a second string tree for the two middle (G and D) strings was added in late 1972. These changes were said to have been made to save money: while it suited the new 'improved' micro-tilt adjustment of the neck (previously requiring neck removal and shimming), the "Bullet" truss rod system, and a 5-way pickup selector on most models, it also resulted in a greater propensity toward mechanical failure of the guitars.
During the CBS era, the company did introduce some new instrument and amplifier designs. The Fender Starcaster was particularly unusual because of its shallow, yet completely hollow body design that still retained the traditional Fender bolt-on neck, albeit with a completely different headstock. The Starcaster also incorporated a new Humbucking pickup designed by Seth Lover, which became known as the Wide Range pickup. This pickup also gave rise to 3 new incarnations of the classic Telecaster: the Telecaster Custom, the Telecaster Deluxe and the Telecaster Thinline. Though more recent use by Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead has raised the Starcaster's profile, CBS-era instruments are generally much less coveted or collectable than the "pre-CBS" models created by Leo Fender prior to selling the Fender companies to CBS in 1965.
The culmination of the CBS "cost-cutting" may have occurred[citation needed] in 1983, when the Fender Stratocaster received a short-lived redesign including a single ("master") tone control, a bare-bones pickguard-mounted output jack, redesigned single-coil pickups, active electronics, and three push buttons for pickup selection (on the Elite Series). Additionally, previous models such as the Swinger (also known as Musiclander) and Custom (also known as Maverick) were perceived by some musicians as little more than attempts to squeeze profits out of factory stock. The so-called "pre-CBS cult" refers to the popularity of Fenders made before the sale.
After selling the Fender company, Leo Fender founded Music Man in 1975, and G&L Musical Instruments in 1979, both of which manufacture electric guitars and basses based on his later designs.

After CBS[edit]


Leo Fender and early guitar models at the Fender Guitar Factory Museum.
In 1985, in a campaign initiated by then CBS Musical Instruments division president William Schultz (1926–2006), the Fender Electric Instrument Manufacturing Company employees purchased the company from CBS and renamed it Fender Musical Instruments Corporation (FMIC). The sale did not include the old Fullerton factory; FMIC had to build a new facility in nearby Corona.
In 1991, FMIC moved its corporate headquarters from its Corona location to Scottsdale, Arizona, where "administration, marketing, advertising, sales and export operations" take place, not only for the United States operations, but many other countries also.[15] Fender guitars built in Ensenada, Mexico, now fulfill the primary export role formerly held by Japanese-made Fenders. The Japanese Fenders are now manufactured specifically for the Japanese market, with only a small number marked for export.
On February 11, 1994, the Ensenada plant burned down, and main production was temporarily moved to Corona.

Acquisitions and partnerships[edit]

FMIC has purchased a number of instrument brands and firms, including the Guild Guitar Company, the Sunn Amplifier Company, and SWR Sound Corporation. In early 2003, FMIC reached an agreement with the Gretsch family and began manufacturing and distributing new Gretsch guitars. Fender also owns Jackson, Olympia, Orpheum, Tacoma GuitarsSquier, and Brand X amps.
On October 28, 2007, Fender acquired Kaman Music Corporation, which owned the Ovation Guitar CompanyLatin Percussion and Toca hand percussion products, Gibraltar HardwareGenz Benz AmplificationCharvelHamer Guitars, and is the exclusive U.S. sales representative for Sabian Cymbals and exclusive worldwide distributor of Takamine Guitars and Gretsch Drums.
In 2011, Volkswagen partnered with Fender to manufacture premium sound systems for its vehicles in North America.[16] Volkswagen vehicles in North America that offer optional Fender Premium Sound are the Volkswagen GolfVolkswagen BeetleVolkswagen Jetta Sedan, Volkswagen Passat, and Volkswagen Tiguan.
In February 2015, KMC was sold by Fender to Jam Industries[17] by FMIC.[18]

Publications[edit]

Fender Frontline[edit]

Fender published the Fender Frontline magazine as a source of product, artist and technical data for the company's customers.[19] The first half featured interviews and articles about the guitars and the stars who played them, and the second half was a catalog section.[20]
Fender published 27 issues of the magazine from 1990 through 2000.[20] Notable interviewees included Kurt Cobain in Fall 1994, in what was his last interview.[21]Fender had designed a hybrid guitar for Cobain, known as a Jag Stang.[22][21] Other notable interviews featured Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour,[23] Glenn Hughesfrom Deep Purple,[24] and King Crimson's Adrian Belew.[25]
In 2001, Fender eliminated the interviews and features section, and Frontline became an annual illustrated price list until 2006, when it was replaced with a product guide.[20]

Product guide[edit]

Since February 2007, Fender produces an annual illustrated product guide in place of its traditional annual Frontline magazine. This change was made in large part due to costs associated with paying royalties for both print and the Internet. With the new illustrated product guide, this removed print issues. The new guide contains the entire range of instruments and amplifiers, with color pictures and basic specifications. These are available through guitar publications and are directly mailed to customers who sign up on the Fender website. As well as these printed formats, Fender Frontline Live launched at the winter NAMM show in January 2007 as a new online reference point, containing information on new products and live footage from the show.

Products[edit]

Fender's core product are electric guitars in Duo-SonicJaguarJazzmasterMustangTelecaster and Stratocaster models. This is alongside bass guitars in MustangJaguarJazz and Precision models. Fender also manufactures acoustic guitars, lap steels guitars, electric violins guitar/ bass amplifiers and the Fender Rhodes electric piano.

Squier[edit]

Squier was a string manufacturer that Fender acquired. Fender has used the Squier brand since 1982 to market inexpensive variants of Fender guitars to compete with Stratocaster copies, as the Stratocaster became more popular. Squier guitars have been manufactured in JapanKoreaMexicoIndiaIndonesiaChina and the United States of America.

See also[edit]


Share:

From ENRON to TPG to Building 7 to the likely murder of Ken Lay

From ENRON to Building 7 to Ken Lay to the TPG Growth Bribery Scandal 

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  

One day at the Library

When the Gaurd attacks the County fails to react.

Portland General Electric (PGE) is a Fortune 1000 public utility based in Portland, Oregon. .... On July 1, 1997, Enron Corporation bought PGE for $2 billion in stock and $1.1 billion in assumed debt. ... The TPG purchase offer was denied by the Oregon Public Utility Commission, a three-member regulatory board, on March 10 ...




The Strack Family Murders

Then when you can't escape relality you go after his relatives


Cnetscandal.blogspot.com



He Paid 15 Million to the DA

He's friends with a former President


Cnetscandal.blogspot.com #pgewitness

It's Utility Terrorism

He's friends with a former President


Cnetscandal.blogspot.com #pgewitness




Share:

The Ghostship Fire and KKR, Pandora, TPG -the Happy Family and the Racketeering Case

David L. Milne and Joseph P. Kennedy

The original documents connected to my Grandfather David L.Milne were lost

THis long story is about databreaches, witness murders, private equity plays, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long as the witnesses testified. He was no longer Vertical as he was laid to rest before testimony.

Even though Bennett endured millions in losses in the form of new business, future business and real estate development plans all came to fruition as the shop was closing in on a million-dollar year in 1987.

Cnetscandal.blogspot.com
David Leslie Milne as seen 1940 SEC documents with American Institute of Accountants providing a reporting analysis of SEC Rules
Photo of sunset
Pete Bennett founded Mainframe Designs Cabinets in 1980.
By the mid-80's customers were Chevron,Wendys,PG&E, Banks, Schools and Hospitials.
Share:

Connecting The GhostShip Fire to TPG Racketeering case and the murder of Pandora Employee Johnny Igaz

Connecting The GhostShip Fire to TPG Racketeering case and the murder of Pandora Employee Johnny Igaz 

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project





The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
EX-99.1 p-ex991_20160323.htm EXHIBIT 99.1



Exhibit 99.1


Pandora Adds Anthony J. “Tony” Vinciquerra as New Independent Member to its Board of Directors Effective Immediately

Media veteran brings decades of experience in advising and growing global businesses

OAKLAND, Calif., March 23, 2016 — Pandora (NYSE:P), the go-to music source for fans and artists, today announced that it is expanding the size of Pandora’s board from 9 seats to 10 seats with the addition of Anthony J. “Tony” Vinciquerra, a technology, media and telecom expert with over 30 years of industry experience. Vinciquerra will join the board as a Class III Director and will be included in Pandora’s proxy statement for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Vinciquerra has three decades of experience in the media industry, which includes advising and growing Fortune 100 media and technology companies. Since 2011, he has been a Senior Advisor to Texas Pacific Group (TPG) in the Technology, Media and Telecom sectors. He has extensive public-company board experience, serving as a director of Qualcomm since July 2015. He previously served as a director of DirecTV from September 2013 until its sale to AT&T in July 2015, Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. from January 2011 to May 2012, and Motorola, Inc. from July 2007 to January 2011.

Prior to his tenure at TPG, Vinciquerra was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fox Networks Group, the largest and most profitable operating unit of News Corporation. Earlier in his career, he held various management positions in the broadcasting and media industry. He holds a B.A. degree in marketing from the State University of New York.

“We’re delighted to welcome Tony to our Board. His extensive experience and insights will greatly benefit Pandora,” said Brian McAndrews, CEO and Chairman of Pandora. “Tony’s addition will help guide Pandora as we grow the company, expand profitability and deliver value for shareholders.”

“We look forward to having Tony on the Board as we work to realize the value that Pandora holds for our stockholders,” said Peter Gotcher, Lead Independent Director on Pandora’s Board. “As the fourth new independent director added in the past 12 months, Tony’s appointment is emblematic of our continued efforts to bring highly experienced and talented individuals with unique perspectives to the Board.”
Vinciquerra will join the board as an independent director. He follows the appointments of media, music and entertainment veterans Mickie Rosen, Roger Faxon and Tim Leiweke who joined the Pandora Board of Directors in 2015 as part of Pandora’s ongoing commitment to bring fresh expertise and skills to advance the company’s growth strategy.

About Pandora
Pandora is the world’s most powerful music discovery platform - a place where artists find their fans and listeners find music they love. We are driven by a single purpose: unleashing the infinite power of music by connecting artists and fans, whether through earbuds, car speakers, live on stage or anywhere fans want to experience it. Our team of highly trained musicologists analyze hundreds of attributes for each recording which powers our proprietary Music Genome Project®, delivering billions of hours of personalized music tailored to the tastes of each music listener, full of discovery, making artist/fan connections at unprecedented scale. Founded by musicians, Pandora empowers artists with valuable data and tools to help grow their careers and connect with their fans.



1 of 2




Pandora
Dominic Paschel, 510-842-6960
Investor Relations
investor@pandora.com

Stephanie Barnes, 415-722-0883
Corporate Communications and Public Relations
sbarnes@pandora.com



2 of 2

Share:

Willkie: Real Estate Department represented longtime client Colony Capital

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  

Colony Capital Acquires National Industrial Real Estate Portfolio For $1.16 Billion

March 7, 2019
Real Estate Department represented longtime client Colony Capital, Inc. in its acquisition of a national portfolio of 54 light and bulk industrial buildings.
On March 5, affiliates of Willkie client Colony Capital, Inc. (NYSE: CLNY), a diversified global real estate investment firm, announced the acquisition of a national portfolio of 54 light and bulk industrial buildings for $1.16 billion. 
This value-add portfolio is located across 10 U.S. markets, totals approximately 11.9 million square feet, and is 71% leased. Forty-eight of the buildings are last-mile light industrial and were acquired through Colony’s existing light industrial platform. The remaining six buildings are bulk industrial and were acquired through a newly formed joint venture in which Colony Capital has a 51% interest and a third-party institutional investor has a 49% interest.
Based in Los Angeles, Colony Capital is a leading global investment management firm with assets under management of $43 billion. The company, with over 400 employees across 17 locations in 10 countries, manages capital on behalf of its stockholders, as well as institutional and retail investors in private funds, non-traded and traded real estate investment trusts and registered investment companies. 
The Willkie deal team was led by partners Thomas Henry and Daniel Backer
Share:

Who is Pete Bennett, Who Does Know, What Does Know?

Who is Pete Bennett, Who Does Know, What Does Know?

This page will likely be fluid as the unfolding bribery scandal will evolve based facts, research and tragedies near Pete Bennett. 
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

The Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific ~ A brutal loss, a corrupt District Attorney, corrupt counsel, corrupt police department linked to the self-serving Contra Costa Bar Association.

Sante Fe Industries: Its not an old Wild, Wild West story it raw, indictive and tragic. This winner take all build an empire, appear in Forbes and lie about a witness murder of young man just 21 years old.

In the 80s, Pete Bennett endured deals near private equity, mergers and acquisitions, not as a deal maker but as a businessperson. Mr. Bennett opened Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures around 1980 on Cloverdale Ave.  Within a year he endured a head-on collision during a spin-out accident, and a rear ender.  Both occurred on Willow Pass. 

Mr. Bennett conclusion leads to Ellinwood Farms incident where two murders occurred next his residence adjacent to the local "Cabbage Patch or Onion Field" run by a older farmer that became friends.                  
Share:

TPG Capital: Company Overview of Colony Global Acquisition Corporation

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistle-blower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus, ProLogis, Fremont Group connected to appearances on TV with Oracle, Microsoft, Apple, and Politicians connected to promoting the H-1b visa.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified but he's dead hence the creation of deadwitness.com 

ss


March 18, 2019 10:09 AM ET
Capital Markets
Company Overview of Colony Global Acquisition Corporation






Executive Profile

Justin T. Chang

Co-Chief Executive Officer, Colony Global Acquisition Corporation
AgeTotal Calculated CompensationThis person is connected to 1 Board Member in 1 organization across 7 different industries.

See Board Relationships
50--

Background

Mr. Justin T. Chang has been Co-Chief Executive Officer at Colony Global Acquisition Corporation since November 24, 2015. Mr. Chang has been Managing Director and Global Head of Private Equity at Colony Capital, Inc. since June 2018. He was Managing Director, Special Situations – Private Equity & Co-Investments at Colony Capital, Inc. Mr. Chang is responsible for the identification, evaluation, consummation, and management of new investments of Colony Capital, Inc. (formerly, Colony NorthStar, Inc.), with a particular focus on extending Colony NorthStar’s presence and activities on a global basis. He has been Principal at Colony Capital, LLC since 2010. He served as an Executive Director at Colony Capital, Inc. since July 30, 2015. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Colony American Homes(CAH) from July 2012 to January 2016. He joined the Colony Capital on April 7, 2010. He co-founded CAF. He also served as the Chief Executive Officer of CAH Manager, LLC. Mr. Chang was responsible for the identification, evaluation and consummation of new investments, with a particular focus on extending the firm's presence and activities on a global basis in non-traditional real estate areas, including financial services, energy and natural resources, healthcare and consumer products. He served as a Vice President of CAH Manager, LLC since July 2012. He served as a Partner and Managing Director of TPG Capital, L.P. from 1993 to 2009. He joined TPG Capital in 1993. At TPG, Mr. Chang led private equity investments across a broad range of industries and in multiple geographies. He also serves as a Partner of Texas Pacific Group and has been its Executive since 1993. Prior to joining Texas Pacific Group, he served as a Financial Analyst in the Merchant Banking Group and the Mergers and Acquisitions Group of Wasserstein Perella & Co., Inc. He has been the Chairman of the Board at Colony Capital, Inc. since November 27, 2018. He was an Observer of QuantumShift, Inc. Mr. Chang has served on the Board of Directors of MVX.com, Inc. since 1999. He serves as Director of Lenovo Group. He serves as Director at Free Flow Wines, LLC. He served as a Director of Crystal Decisions Inc. (formerly Seagate Software, Inc.) since February 2001. He served as a Director of PingAn Bank Co., Ltd., (Shenzhen Development Bank Co. Ltd.), since June 2006. He served as a Director of QuantumShift, Inc. and Interlink Group, Inc. He served as a Director at ON Semiconductor Corporation from August 1999 to May 16, 2007. Mr. Chang has served on the Boards of Directors of UTAC Holdings and was the Chairman of the Board of UTAC Holdings from 2007 to 2009. He serves as a Director of Colony American Homes, Inc. He also serves on the International Advisory Board of Virgin Green Fund and on the Boards of several non-profit institutions. He serves on Board of Trustees of the Archer School for Girls. He served as Trustee of Colony Starwood Homes since January 5, 2016 until June 7, 2017. He serves on the Yale President's Council on International Activities and the Yale Development Council. He served as a Director of CAH from July 2012 to January 2016. He served as a Director of Beringer Wine Estates Holdings, Inc. and Silverado Premium Properties, LLC. Mr. Chang received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School in 1993 and a B.A., cum laude, in Economics and Political Science from Yale University in 1989.



Corporate Headquarters

515 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071

United States

Phone: 310-282-8820
Fax: --

Board Members Memberships

2018-Present
Chairman

Education

MBA 1993
Harvard Business School
BA 1989
Yale University

Other Affiliations


Annual Compensation

There is no Annual Compensation data available.

Stocks Options

There is no Stock Options data available.

Total Compensation

There is no Total Compensation data available.

\




Share:

About TPG

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
About TPG Growth
TPG Growth is the middle market and growth equity investment platform of TPG, the global alternative asset firm. With approximately $13.2 billion of assets under management, TPG Growth targets investments in a broad range of industries and geographies. TPG Growth has the deep sector knowledge, operational resources, and global experience to drive value creation, and help companies reach their full potential. The firm is backed by the resources of TPG, which has more than $103 billion of assets under management. For more information, visit www.tpg.com.
Share:

Trinity Commons - Threats of arrest when seeking food.

Trinity Commons - Threats of arrest when seeking food.  No food, no housing and no chance to get back to work.  

Throw in Parental Abduction, a few churches and the boy scouts and you have legal jeapordy.
The recent Federal Indictments of TPG CEO William McGlashan demonstrate inequities in America.  Pete Bennett a local resident of Walnut Creek with a 40 years history is denied food, access to housing and has been banned by Trinity Center.  One reason is  Bennett's business and media efforts on Jobs and Outsourcing resulted in witness intimidation, threats of arrests, multiple attempts on his life and Parental Abduction of his sons. 


It took years to trace the suspects, agencies and local churches, tie them to a corrupt district attorney.  The former District Attorneys offices consistently refused to make arrests in the murder of San Francisco Police Officer Lester Garnier shot dead in Walnut Creek CA during a warm July night in 1988.  The reward signed by Mayor Newsom brought Pete Bennett forward which resulted in his sons being kidnapped with the help of Hillside Covenent Church. 

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
   
Share:

Trinity Center Walnut Creek patterns of Discrimination based on Sexual Orientation

Discrimination based on Sexual Orientation and Trinity Center Walnut Creek 

Trinity Center recieves funding from the City of Walnut Creek
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  


What You Should Know About EEOC and the Enforcement Protections for LGBT Workers


Overview

EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation.  These protections apply regardless of any contrary state or local laws.
Through investigation, conciliation, and litigation of charges by individuals against private sector employers, as well as hearings and appeals for federal sector workers, the Commission has taken the position that existing sex discrimination provisions in Title VII protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) applicants and employees against employment bias.  The Commission has obtained approximately $6.4 million in monetary relief for individuals, as well as numerous employer policy changes, in voluntary resolutions of LGBT discrimination charges under Title VII since data collection began in 2013.  A growing number of court decisions have endorsed the Commission's interpretation of Title VII.
The information provided below highlights what you should know about EEOC's outreach and enforcement in this area. 

Examples of LGBT-Related Sex Discrimination Claims

Some examples of LGBT-related claims that EEOC views as unlawful sex discrimination include:
  • Failing to hire an applicant because she is a transgender woman.
  • Firing an employee because he is planning or has made a gender transition.
  • Denying an employee equal access to a common restroom corresponding to the employee's gender identity.
  • Harassing an employee because of a gender transition, such as by intentionally and persistently failing to use the name and gender pronoun that correspond to the gender identity with which the employee identifies, and which the employee has communicated to management and employees.
  • Denying an employee a promotion because he is gay or straight.
  • Discriminating in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, such as providing a lower salary to an employee because of sexual orientation, or denying spousal health insurance benefits to a female employee because her legal spouse is a woman, while providing spousal health insurance to a male employee whose legal spouse is a woman.
  • Harassing an employee because of his or her sexual orientation, for example, by derogatory terms, sexually oriented comments, or disparaging remarks for associating with a person of the same or opposite sex.
  • Discriminating against or harassing an employee because of his or her sexual orientation or gender identity, in combination with another unlawful reason, for example, on the basis of transgender status and race, or sexual orientation and disability.
See How to File a Charge of Employment Discrimination for information about filing a Title VII charge of sex discrimination in employment related to gender identity or sexual orientation bias. There is a different complaint process for federal employees.                                   

Applicable Federal Law

EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate in employment against a job applicant, employee, or former employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.  These federal laws also prohibit employers from retaliating against workers who oppose discriminatory employment practices - for example, by reporting incidents of sexual harassment to their supervisor or human resources department - or against those who participate in an employment discrimination proceeding - for example by filing an EEOC charge, cooperating with an EEOC investigation, or participating in an employment discrimination lawsuit.
While Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not explicitly include sexual orientation or gender identity in its list of protected bases, the Commission, consistent with Supreme Court case law holding that employment actions motivated by gender stereotyping are unlawful sex discrimination and other court decisions, interprets the statute's sex discrimination provision as prohibiting discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Over the past several years the Commission has set forth its position in several published decisions involving federal employment.  These decisions explain the legal basis for concluding that LGBT-related discrimination constitutes sex discrimination under Title VII, and give examples of what would be considered unlawful. In so ruling, the Commission has not recognized any new protected characteristics under Title VII.  Rather, it has applied existing Title VII precedents to sex discrimination claims raised by LGBT individuals.  The Commission has reiterated these positions through recent amicus curiae briefs and litigation against private companies.

Sex Discrimination - Transgender Status

In Macy v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120821, 2012 WL 1435995 (April 20, 2012), the Commission held that intentional discrimination against a transgender individual because that person's gender identity is, by definition, discrimination based on sex and therefore violates Title VII. 
The Macy decision explains that allegations of gender identity/transgender discrimination necessarily involve sex discrimination.  Such cases can be viewed as sex discrimination based on non-conformance with gender norms and stereotypes under the Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, and based on a plain reading of the statute's "because of . . . sex" language. 
Applying Macy, the Commission has also held that an employer's restrictions on a transgender woman's ability to use a common female restroom facility constitutes disparate treatment, Lusardi v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133395, 2015 WL 1607756 (Mar. 27, 2015), that intentional misuse of a transgender employee's new name and pronoun may constitute sex-based discrimination and/or harassment, Jameson v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120130992, 2013 WL 2368729 (May 21, 2013), and that an employer's failure to revise its records pursuant to changes in gender identity stated a valid Title VII sex discrimination claim, Complainant v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133123, 2014 WL 1653484 (Apr. 16, 2014).

Sex Discrimination - Sexual Orientation

In Baldwin v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. 0120133080 (July 15, 2015), the Commission held that a claim of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily states a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VII. 
The Baldwin decision explains that allegations of sexual orientation discrimination necessarily involve sex-based considerations.  First, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily involves treating an employee differently because of his or her sex.  For example, a lesbian employee disciplined for displaying a picture of her female spouse can allege that an employer took a different action against her based on her sex where the employer did not discipline a male employee for displaying a picture of his female spouse.  Sexual orientation discrimination is also sex discrimination because it is associational discrimination on the basis of sex.  That is, an employee alleging discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is alleging that the employer took the employee's sex into account by treating him or her differently for associating with a person of the same sex.  Finally, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is sex discrimination because it necessarily involves discrimination based on gender stereotypes, including employer beliefs about the person to whom the employee should be attracted. 

Charge Data

In FY 2015, EEOC received a total of 1,412 charges that included allegations of sex discrimination related to sexual orientation and/or gender identity/transgender status.  This represents an increase of approximately 28% over the total LGBT charges filed in FY 2014 (1,100).  EEOC resolved a total of 1,135 LGBT charges in FY 2015, including through voluntary agreements providing approximately $3.3 million in monetary relief for workers and achieving changes in employer policies so that discrimination would not recur.  This reflects increases of 34% in the number of resolutions over FY 2014 (847) and 51% in the amount of monetary relief over FY 2014 ($2.19 million).

Conciliation and Litigation

When the Commission finds reasonable cause to believe that discrimination has occurred, it seeks to resolve the matter voluntarily through informal means of conciliation, conference, and persuasion.  If the Commission is unable to secure a voluntary resolution, it has authority to file suit in federal court.  In several cases, the Commission has filed LGBT-related lawsuits under Title VII challenging alleged sex discrimination.  Read about examples of pending and resolved EEOC litigation involving Title VII sex discrimination claims brought on behalf of LGBT individuals, as well as EEOC amicus briefs filed in suits brought by private individuals raising these issues.   

Federal Sector Enforcement

In the federal sector, EEOC has implemented its priority for covering LGBT individuals in a variety of ways:
  • Tracking gender identity and sexual orientation appeals in the federal sector
  • Issuing 20 federal sector decisions in FY 2015, including finding that gender identity-related complaints and sexual orientation discrimination-related complaints can be brought under Title VII through the federal sector EEO complaint process.  For example, in  Larita G. v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120142154 (Nov. 18, 2015), EEOC reversed the Agency's dismissal of a hostile work environment claim on the basis of sexual orientation because such an allegation is necessarily an allegation of sex discrimination under Title VII.
  • Establishing an LGBT workgroup to further EEOC's adjudicatory and oversight responsibilities
  • Issuing guidance, including instructions for processing complaints of discrimination by LGBT federal employees and applicants available on EEOC's public web site
  • Providing technical assistance to federal agencies in the development of gender transition policies and plans
  • Providing LGBT related outreach to federal agencies through briefings, presentations, and case law updates

Training and Outreach

EEOC is addressing LGBT legal developments in numerous outreach and training presentations to the public.  During FY 2015, field office staff conducted more than700 events and reached over 43,000 attendees where LGBT sex-discrimination issues were among the topics discussed. In the federal sector during FY 2015, there were approximately 53 presentations delivered to over 4,400 federal sector audience members.  These events reached a wide variety of audiences, including employee advocacy groups, small employer groups, students and staff at colleges and universities, staff and managers at federal agencies and human resource professionals.  To assist in this outreach, EEOC is distributing a brochure, Preventing Employment Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender Employees.

Resources

The Commission has issued various technical assistance publications on LGBT issues, including:

Useful resources from other agencies include:

Other Laws

Be aware of other laws that also may apply:
  • Federal contractors and sub-contractors are covered by a separate, explicit prohibition on transgender or sexual orientation discrimination in employment pursuant to Executive Order 13672 and implementing regulations issued and enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance.  For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions on E.O. 13672 Final Rule, www.dol.gov/ofccp/LGBT/LGBT_FAQs.html
  • State or local fair employment laws may explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.  Contact information for state and local fair employment agencies can be found on the page for EEOC's field office covering that state or locality. On the other hand, if a state or local law permits or does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, the EEOC will still enforce Title VII's discrimination prohibitions against covered employers in that jurisdiction because contrary state law is not a defense under Title VII.  Applicants and employees in those jurisdictions should contact the EEOC directly if they believe they have been subjected to sex discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Note that the U.S. Department of Justice's position regarding Title VII's coverage of LGBT-related discrimination differs from that of the EEOC. See https://www.justice.gov/ag/page/file/1006981/download.

Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts