That's right, @USAFBand struck again...this time at @UnionStation_DC. #USAF #holidays https://t.co/pM2effhpTq

— U.S. Air Force (@usairforce) December 4, 2015

Read More

Jennifer Hudson Family Murder Trial: Guilty on All Counts

• By Alex Perez
• ANDREW FIES
• MICHAEL S. JAMES
• Christina Ng

CHICAGO, May 11, 2012

A jury has found William Balfour guilty of murdering actress Jennifer Hudson's mother, brother and 7-year-old nephew in 2008.

Balfour, 31, was accused of killing the three in a jealous rage, believing that his estranged wife, Julia Hudson, Jennifer Hudson's sister, was dating another man.

Jennifer Hudson, who sat between her fiance and Julia Hudson, silently cried as the verdict was read. Her fiance held her hand and rubbed her back. As Jennifer Hudson started to cry, her sister reached over and grabbed her hand and they looked at each other for a few seconds.

Balfour appeared to sit expressionless.

After the verdict, Balfour's attorney, Cook County Public Defender Amy Thompson, again characterized the case against Balfour as circumstantial and maintained his innocence. She said there would be an appeal.

"We are disappointed in the verdict, but we do appreciate all of the hard work the jury did in this case," she told reporters. "We're hoping that the appellate court will take a look at this case with a very critical eye."

The Hudson family left the courthouse out of the public's view without addressing the media. Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez spoke with Jennifer Hudson moments after the verdict and said Hudson was "emotional, but relieved."

Later, Jennifer and Julia Hudson issued a statement of thanks to police, prosecutors and others involved in the trial, according to The Chicago Sun-Times.

"We have felt the love and support from people all over the world and we're very grateful," the statement said. "We want to extend a prayer from the Hudson family to the Balfour family.

"We have all suffered terrible loss in this tragedy," the statement added. "It is our prayer that the Lord will forgive Mr. Balfour of these heinous acts and bring his heart into repentance someday."

The announcement that there was a verdict came shortly after the jury told Judge Charles Burns that it was split but wrote in a note, "We are trying." Burns ordered a resumption of deliberations in hopes of the jury's reaching an agreement. In a second note, the jury requested testimony about Balfour's cellphone records.

Soon afterward, after some 18 hours of deliberations over three days, the jury found Balfour guilty of all charges against him -- three counts of first-degree murder, home invasion, residential burglary, aggravated kidnapping and possession of a stolen vehicle.

Jurors said later that they overcame what was a 9-3 split in the jury room favoring a guilty verdict to come to a unanimous decision.

"There were three of us who just needed to see the picture a little clearer," said Jacinta Gholston, 35, who works for a Chicago-based chocolate company and initially was among the dissenters. "There were some holes or some gaps, per se, that just needed to be filled in."

Jurors said the mild disagreement was resolved by putting together a timeline of Balfour's movements, largely from the testimony about his cellphone records.

"He could not be in two places at one time," said Paula Halcomb, a teacher in Chicago's southwest suburbs. "The cellphone records were key, actually."

Despite the focus on Jennifer Hudson, jurors said the actress, her testimony and the attention she drew to the case and courtroom did not factor significantly into their deliberations.

"No, that didn't weigh in on our [deliberations], what Jennifer said, because, really, she didn't say anything," juror Tracie Austin said.

"This wasn't a case about Jennifer Hudson to us," Gholston added. "This was a case about William Balfour."

"We absolutely felt some empathy for him," she added later.

Asked if the jury had any message for Jennifer Hudson, jury foreman Robert Smith, a bus aide for the Chicago public schools, said, "To be perfectly honest, I really don't have anything to say with her. I just hope she can put this behind her and really get on with her life."

More Than 80 Witnesses Over Three Weeks

The trial began on April 23 in Chicago. Prosecutors called more than 80 witnesses over two weeks, and the defense rested its case after 30 minutes, calling only two witnesses to the stand. Balfour did not testify.

Prosecutors alleged that Balfour fatally shot Hudson's mother, Darnell Donerson, 57, in her living room, and then shot Hudson's brother Jason Hudson, 29, as he lay in bed. He then kidnapped Hudson's nephew Julian King, who was 7. Investigators believe the boy was shot in the head as he lay behind the front seat of an SUV.

Prosecuting State Attorney Veryl Gambino said Balfour was in a state of rage over Julia Hudson's dating another man, and said Balfour had issued several threats against her and her family. Balfour allegedly was enraged on Oct. 24, 2008, after he saw balloons another man sent to Julia Hudson and punched them.

Julia Hudson found her mother's body in her home and initially thought she had fallen. It wasn't until she saw blood that she realized something worse had taken place. Julia Hudson ran screaming from the house and called 911.

The killings happened in the family home in Chicago's tough Englewood neighborhood, where Jennifer Hudson grew up.

In Assistant State Attorney Jennifer Bagby's closing arguments, she said that Balfour "was fueled by his obsession, his jealousy, his determination to catch his wife, Julia Hudson, with another man. She didn't want him around, her family didn't want him around. But in his mind, she was his wife, and if he couldn't have her, no one could."

Bagby punctuated her narrative by frequently quoting Balfour's allegedly repeated threat to his estranged wife: "If you leave me, I will kill you. I will kill your family first. You will be the last to die."

While the defense argued no physical evidence linked Balfour to the murders, prosecutors spent significant portions of their closing arguments focusing on what they said was important physical evidence in this case.

The evidence included cellphone records that put Balfour near the scene at the time of murders, gun residue found on Balfour's clothing and on the steering wheel of his car, and the key to Jason Hudson's SUV found on Balfour when he was arrested.

Prosecutors spoke about the "overwhelming circumstantial evidence."

Balfour's attorneys say there is no evidence or DNA linking him to the murders.

Thompson said in her closing arguments that police "weren't trying to figure this out. They had their man. They spread it across the news. They were just trying to prove it by building a case any way they could."

Thompson emphasized that Balfour's fingerprints were not found on the gun or the car where Julian was killed.

"The one constant in this case is that every piece of DNA evidence absolutely excludes William Balfour," Thompson said. "The one person in all of Chicago who didn't do it is him. That's what the evidence showed."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Read More

Watch: President Obama Addresses the Nation on terrorism

zzzz


OBAMA: Good evening. On Wednesday, 14 Americans were killed as they came together to celebrate the holidays. They were taken from family and friends who loved them deeply. They were white and black, Latino and Asian, immigrants, and American born, moms and dads, daughters and sons. Each of them served their fellow citizens. All of them were part of our American family.
Tonight I want to talk with you about this tragedy, the broader threat of terrorism and how we can keep our country safe. The FBI is still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but here’s what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by one of their co-workers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas or that they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home. But it is clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against America and the West. They had stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition, and pipe bombs.
So this was an act of terrorism designed to kill innocent people. Our nation has been at war with terrorists since Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11. In the process, we’ve hardened our defenses, from airports, to financial centers, to other critical infrastructure. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have disrupted countless plots here and overseas and worked around the clock to keep us safe.
Our military and counterterrorism professionals have relentlessly pursued terrorist networks overseas, disrupting safe havens in several different countries, killing Osama Bin Laden, and decimating Al Qaeda’s leadership.
Over the last few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase. As we’ve become better at preventing complex multifaceted attacks like 9/11, terrorists turn to less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society. It is this type of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009, in Chattanooga earlier this year, and now in San Bernardino.
And as groups like ISIL grew stronger amidst the chaos of war in Iraq and then Syria, and as the Internet erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by terrorists to poison the minds of people like the Boston Marathon bombers and the San Bernardino killers.
For seven years, I’ve confronted this evolving threat each and every morning in my intelligence briefing, and since the day I took this office, I have authorized U.S. forces to take out terrorists abroad precisely because I know how real the danger is.
As commander in chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people.
As a father to two young daughters who are the most precious part of my life, I know that we see ourselves with friends and co-workers at a holiday party like the one in San Bernardino. I know we see our kids in the faces of the young people killed in Paris.
And I know that after so much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a cancer that has no immediate cure.
Well, here’s what I want you to know. The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other organization that tries to harm us. Our success won’t depend on tough talk, or abandoning our values or giving into fear. That’s what groups like ISIL are hoping for. Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless. And by drawing upon every aspect of American power.
Here’s how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, air strikes are taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers, infrastructure.
And since attacks in Paris, our closest allies, including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, have ramped up their contributions to our military campaign which will help us accelerate our effort to destroy ISIL.
Second, we will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of thousands of Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so that we take away their safe havens.
In both countries, we’re deploying special operations forces who can accelerate that offensive. We’ve stepped up this effort since the attacks in Paris, and will continue to invest more in approaches that are working on the ground.
Third, we’re working with friends and allies to stop ISIL’s operations, to disrupt plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them from recruiting more fighters.
Since the attacks in Paris, we’ve surged merged intelligence sharing with our European allies. We’re working with Turkey to seal its border with Syria, and we are cooperating with Muslim majority countries, and with our Muslim communities here at home, to counter the vicious ideology that ISIL promotes online.
Fourth, with American leadership, the international community has begun to establish a process and timeline to pursue cease-fires and a political resolution to the Syrian war.
Doing so will allow the Syrian people and every country, including our allies, but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal of destroying ISIL, a group that threatens us all.
This is our strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by our military commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65 countries that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly examine our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to get the job done.
That’s why I’ve ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review the visa waiver program under which the female terrorist in San Bernardino originally came to this country. And that’s why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.
Now, here at home, we have to work together to address the challenge. There are several steps that Congress should take right away. To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no- fly list is able to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semiautomatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.
We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons, like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject any gun-safety measures, but the fact is that our intelligence and law-enforcement agencies, no matter how effective they are, cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual was motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology.
What we can do, and must do, is make it harder for them to kill.
Next, we should put in place stronger screening for those who come to America without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether they’ve traveled to war zones. And we’re working with members of both parties in Congress to do exactly that.
Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against these terrorists.
For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of air strikes against ISIL targets. I think it’s time for Congress to vote to demonstrate that the American people are united and committed to this fight.
My fellow Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the terrorist threat.
Let me now say a word about what we should not do. We should not be drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria. That’s what groups like ISIL want. They know they can’t defeat us on the battlefield. ISIL fighters were part of the insurgency that we faced in Iraq. But they also know that if we occupy foreign lands, they can maintain insurgencies for years, killing thousands of our troops and draining our resources, and using our presence to draw new recruits.
The strategy that we are using now — air strikes, special forces, and working with local forces who are fighting to regain control of their own country — that is how we’ll achieve a more sustainable victory, and it won’t require us sending a new generation of Americans overseas to fight and die for another decade on foreign soil.
Here’s what else we cannot do. We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That, too, is what groups like ISIL want.
ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death. And they account for a tiny fraction of a more than a billion Muslims around the world, including millions of patriotic Muslim-Americans who reject their hateful ideology.
Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim.
If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism, we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.
That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some Muslim communities. It’s a real problem that Muslims must confront without excuse.
Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups like ISIL and Al Qaeda promote, to speak out against not just acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.
But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility of all Americans, of every faith, to reject discrimination. It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country. It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim-Americans should somehow be treated differently. Because when we travel down that road, we lose. That kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups like ISIL.
Muslim-Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co- workers, our sports heroes. And, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.
My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a belief in human dignity that no matter who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like or what religion you practice, you are equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law. Even in this political season, even as we properly debate what steps I and future presidents must take to keep our country safe. Let’s make sure we never forget what makes us exceptional. Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear. That we have always met challenges, whether war or depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks, by coming together around our common ideals as one nation and one people.
So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt that America will prevail.
Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.

Read More

Pro Tem De León and Senate Delegation Join Governor Brown in Paris

Pro Tem De León and Senate Delegation Join Governor Brown in Paris

Read More

Major Defense Logistics Agency Contract Awarded to Accenture

Aerospace & Defense

Resources

How Enterprising Companies Are Moving Business Reporting to the Cloud:
Public and private companies alike must generate a wide array of bu...

The Digital Transformation Journey: Key Technology Considerations:
In the Application Economy, speed, innovation, and quality, have be...

Vulnerability Management for Dummies:
Get all the Facts and See How to Implement a Successful Vulnerabili...

Major Defense Logistics Agency Contract Awarded to Accenture

By: Global Logistics & Supply Chain Strategies | May 01, 2007

Accenture has been awarded a contract by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) to provide business systems integration, systems engineering and application management services.
The base contract is for five years and is said to be valued at $155m, with options to extend the agreement by another five years that are valued at $97m. The so-called Enterprise Business System (EBS) integration and sustainment contract continues DLA's modernization efforts and provides application management support for the agency's enterprise systems.
Under the new contract, Accenture will work with DLA to deliver new capabilities that are focused on providing more efficient, effective and reliable supply chain support to the military services. Accenture will continue to modernize DLA's multiple logistics systems into a single, integrated end-to-end system, extending business functions based on leading practices and replacing legacy software systems with commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software.
Accenture says it will also work with DLA to help implement its strategy and direction for future modernization efforts. The first initiatives that DLA has identified to be performed under EBS are the implementation of a new SAP-based e-procurement system and upgrading the SAP application suite to the latest version. 
In addition, Accenture will assist DLA in performing its expanded mission under the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 Commission recommendations, where DLA will assume specific procurement responsibilities for the military services.
Accenture will also provide application-management services, supporting DLA's mission-critical supply chain systems.
"As a result of the United States' growing military obligations as well as Base Realignment and Closure requirements, DLA's global mission continues to expand," said Eric Stange, managing director of Accenture's Defense practice. "Our supply chain expertise and unique understanding of DLA's technical environment make us well positioned to help the agency achieve its mission of supporting America's warfighters around the globe."
Accenture previously had won the DLA Business Systems Modernization contract in 2000 and delivered a new SAP-based system. The new EBS integration and sustainment capability will build upon DLA's modernization efforts to enhance the agency's supply chains.
Visit www.accenture.com.

Read More

Milne Trust

Read More

Accenture and Microsoft Launch New Hybrid Cloud Platform to Accelerate Enterprise-Wide Adoption

Accenture and Microsoft Launch New Hybrid Cloud Platform to Accelerate Enterprise-Wide Adoption

NOTE: The most unusual event occurred back in December 2013 - the CEO of Accenture viewed my profile wow I'm flattered and still homeless (2016). 

• You can not win 
• You lose against them 
• You are considered acceptable losses on their battlefield 
• ENRON Execs stole millions, 
• PG&E and Accenture project was a huge failure. 

Read More

Accenture and Microsoft Launch New Hybrid Cloud Platform to Accelerate Enterprise-Wide Adoption

This posting is presented to portray how Microsoft, Fremont Group (Real Estate Investments) Attorney Rick Kopf who funded Mitt Romney.

The problem for Romney is a witness in Bennett v. Southern Pacific was murdered and connected to me is the Strack Murders, The Driscoll Murders, The David Bremer Murder, The Officer Youngstrom Murder and many other murders or accidents.  Try Contra Costa Murders

Read More

FIRE FIGHTERS LOCAL 1230 has given $135,100 to 29 different filers over 15 years.

Sorry we lost them before you could meet them

	Candidate	Specific Party	General Party	Election Jurisdiction	Election Year	Election Type	Office Sought	Election Status	Incumbency Status	# of Records	Total $
	ANGELIDES, PHILIP N	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2006	STANDARD	GOVERNOR	LOST-GENERAL	CHALLENGER	3	$10,200
	DAVIS, GRAY	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2002	STANDARD	GOVERNOR	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	2	$10,000
	SBRANTI, TIM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2014	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 016	LOST-GENERAL	OPEN	5	$8,200
	BONILLA, SUSAN	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2010	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	3	$7,800
	DESAULNIER, MARK	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 007	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	6	$6,900
	DESAULNIER, MARK	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2006	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	6	$6,050
	BROWN, EDMUND G (JERRY)	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2010	STANDARD	GOVERNOR	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$5,000
	BONILLA, SUSAN	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2014	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	4	$4,850
	CANCIAMILLA, JOSEPH	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2000	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	2	$4,350
	GERBER, DONNA	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2002	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	LOST-GENERAL	OPEN	3	$4,000
	BONILLA, SUSAN	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	4	$4,000
	FRAZIER, JIM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2014	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	3	$3,500
	DESAULNIER, MARK	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2008	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 007	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	4	$3,200
	FRAZIER, JIM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$3,000
	RAMSEY, CHARLES	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2002	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	LOST-PRIMARY	OPEN	1	$2,500
	CANCIAMILLA, JOSEPH	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2002	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$2,500
	THURMOND, TONY K	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2014	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$2,100
	TORRICO, ALBERTO	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2010	STANDARD	ATTORNEY GENERAL	LOST-PRIMARY	OPEN	2	$2,000
	TORLAKSON, TOM	NONPARTISAN	NONPARTISAN	CA	2010	STANDARD	SUPER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	2	$2,000
	SKINNER, NANCY C	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	2	$2,000
	BUCHANAN, JOAN T	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 016	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	2	$2,000
	TORLAKSON, TOM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2004	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 007	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	4	$1,800
	TORLAKSON, TOM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2000	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 007	WON-GENERAL	CHALLENGER	1	$1,700
	LOCKYER, BILL	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	1998	STANDARD	ATTORNEY GENERAL	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	2	$1,500
	HANCOCK, LONI	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2004	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	2	$1,500
	TORLAKSON, TOM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	1998	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	2	$1,100
	DAVIS, GRAY	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	1998	STANDARD	GOVERNOR	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$1,000
	CANCIAMILLA, JOSEPH	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2004	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$1,000
	LENO, MARK	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2004	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 013	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$1,000
	BUCHANAN, JOAN T	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2008	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$1,000
	HANCOCK, LONI	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2008	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 009	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$1,000
	SKINNER, NANCY C	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2008	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$1,000
	TORLAKSON, TOM	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2008	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 011	WON-GENERAL	OPEN	1	$1,000
	SKINNER, NANCY C	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2010	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 014	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$1,000
	BUCHANAN, JOAN T	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2010	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$1,000
	FLOYD, RICHARD E (DICK)	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2000	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 025	LOST-PRIMARY	OPEN	1	$500
	LOCKYER, BILL	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2002	STANDARD	ATTORNEY GENERAL	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$500
	HANCOCK, LONI	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2012	STANDARD	SENATE DISTRICT 009	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$500
	TORLAKSON, TOM	NONPARTISAN	NONPARTISAN	CA	2014	STANDARD	SUPER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION	WON-GENERAL	INCUMBENT	1	$500
	SHAW, ELAINE D	DEMOCRATIC	DEMOCRATIC	CA	2004	STANDARD	ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 015	LOST-GENERAL	CHALLENGER	1	$250
	EASTIN, DELAINE	NONPARTISAN	NONPARTISAN	CA	1998	STANDARD	SUPER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION	WON-GENERAL	OPEN

Read More

FEINSTEIN, DIANNE has run in 1 race for public office, winning 1 of them. The candidate has raised a total of $7,915,610.

HashTag Corner

The Murder Suicides are Murders

1	PG&E Corp				$120,700	$111,050	$9,650
2	JStreetPAC				$82,171	$75,525	$6,646
3	General Atomics				$56,750	$46,750	$10,000
4	Edison International				$54,250	$44,250	$10,000
5	General Dynamics				$43,500	$33,500	$10,000
6	BAE Systems				$40,000	$30,000	$10,000
7	Diamond Foods				$31,599	$21,600	$9,999
8	Northrop Grumman				$30,800	$20,800	$10,000
9	Intl Alliance Theatrical Stage Employees				$30,000	$0	$30,000
10	Akin, Gump et al				$27,250	$21,250	$6,000
10	Wells Fargo				$27,250	$17,250	$10,000
12	University of California				$25,522	$25,522	$0
13	Manatt, Phelps & Phillips				$23,750	$18,750	$5,000
14	Bechtel Group				$23,650	$15,650	$8,000
14	Walt Disney Co				$23,650	$18,650	$5,000
16	DISH Network				$22,500	$12,500	$10,000
17	THL Partners				$22,359	$17,359	$5,000
18	Girardi & Keese				$21,600	$21,600	$0
18	Munger, Tolles & Olson				$21,600	$21,600	$0
20	Sony Corp				$20,950	$12,950	$8,000

Read More