The Anatomy of Public Corruption

Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Poverty. Show all posts

You'll need "Food from the Bar" after your witnesses have been killed.



The Koko Challenge

Food From The Bar? The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammell Crow, Lennar, Catellus




Law Firms Launch Class Action against Bay Area Poverty


Posted on September 26, 2011, by United Way in Pathways Out of Poverty

How many lawyers in gorilla suits does it take to tackle poverty? It might sound like joke, but to the 31 Bay Area law firms competing in United Way's Koko Challenge this year, fighting poverty is something they all take very seriously.


Every year, the legal community comes together to raise money to fight poverty. Competition is fierce, and top winners receive stuffed gorillas as a prize. Law firms have been known to station their gorillas proudly in their lobbies,
symbolizing their dedication to the community.


On September 22, we kicked-off the 24th annual Koko Challenge, Last year, 21 participating firms raised $1.5 million. With 10 new firms joining the Challenge this year, we're excited to see the legal community once again raise the bar for philanthropy
in the Bay Area.

The theme of this year's challenge is "Class action against poverty," to align with United Way's community effort to cut in half the number of local families who live in poverty by the year 2020.

Gap, Inc. General Counsel Michelle Banks, chair of this year's Koko Cabinet, announced this year's goal to raise $1.8 million, with $700,000 directed to United Way.

The Fremont Group General Counsel Rick Kopf chimed in, urging everyone to increase their gifts by 20% and direct it to United Way programs: SparkPoint, Community Schools, MatchBridge, 211 and Earn It! Keep It! Save It! This collective
increase would raise an additional $300,000 for United Way, and enable us to continue to operate and expand our poverty fighting programs.

The spirit and enthusiasm of Shook, Hardy and Bacon LLP Partner Kevin Haroff was hard to match as he had already purchased his own gorilla suit. To help raise spirits - as well as funds - during this year's Challenge, he offered to wear the gorilla suit to any event hosted by the 10 new participating firms.

Many thanks to Shook, Hardy and Bacon LLP, winner of last year's Baby Koko award and host of our kick-off event. And, thank you to the Koko Koko Cabinet, a volunteer committee that oversees the Challenge (listed below). The Challenge would not be possible
without your support and enthusiasm.


For more information about how you can join the 2010-2011 Koko Challenge please contact Danielle Cohen (415) 808-4322 or dcohen@uwba.org.



ddd
ddd

Bennett v. Southern Pacific

Pete Bennett awaiting CT Scan for one of many attacks

Valley View Veterinary

Customer of Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures.   Harve and Kieko Ringheim brutally murdered in their Dublin home in 1986

The Challenge to the Koko

Go ProBono for Pete Bennett ~ but just remember his witnesses, family and clients have been murdered.
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammell Crow, Lennar, Catellus, Southern Pacific and others.  



Highlighted Events












2011 - 2012 Koko Cabinet

sss
  • Michelle Banks, EVP, General Counsel, Gap, Inc. - Chair
  • Charles S. Custer, Partner, Gordon & Rees LLP
  • Nancy Greenan Hamill, Campus Counsel, UC Santa Barbara
  • Kevin Haroff, Partner, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP
  • David A. Hearth, Partner, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
  • Michael W. Kelly, Partner, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP
  • Rick Kopf, Managing Director, Operations & General Counsel, The Fremont Group
  • R. Hewitt Pate, VP, General Counsel, Chevron Corporation
  • James Potter, SVP, General Counsel, Del Monte Foods
  • Jay J. Price, Assistant General Counsel, Bank of America See Pete Bennett
  • Bill Sawyers, EVP, CAO & General Counsel, Ernst Gallo Clinic and Research Center
  • Jim Strother, EVP, General Counsel, Wells Fargo & Co.
  • Vanessa Washington, Senior EVP, General Counsel & Secretary, Bank of the West Delta  no
Richard Rainey and the Mormons

In the matter of Bennett vs. Southern Pacific a witness murder went down in 1989. The witness was slated to testify on behalf of Pete Bennett. The case fell apart on the courthouse steps. Judge Peter Spinetta should be a hostile witness now living in Darby Montana.

Southern Pacific Attorney Richard Stanford Kopf worked at SP from before the 1973 Roseville Rail Yard exploded until the end of days for Southern Pacific. Richard Stanford Kopf The PG&E Drama During early 2011 a PG&E vendor hailing from Roswell Georgia contracted Pete Bennett with a software project related to the San Bruno Explosion. During 2011, Pete Bennett was hired during a very desperate time. Recently chased from Walnut Creek from offices in Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, San Francisco, and just about everywhere suddenly connects with PG&E. Pete is a local Bay Area Developer but then was homeless and desperate for work and money. What Bennett uncovered was the project was fake project or fake news. By summer his sons were kidnapped by a Walnut Creek Police officer who was once Sgt Keeler connected to the 1988 Murder of Safeway Manager Cynthia Kempf. It took several years to find the connections between Southern Pacific, PG&E, Kinder Morgan< Oracle, The World Trade Center Bombings and officers arrested in narcotics taskforce scandal.
Share:

Company Overview of Blum Capital Partner

March 12, 2019 10:30 PM ET

Capital Markets

Company Overview of Blum Capital Partners


Executive Profile

Richard Charles Blum

Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman, Blum Capital Partners
AgeTotal Calculated CompensationThis person is connected to 8 Board Members in 8 organization across 12 different industries.

See Board Relationships
83--

Background

Mr. Richard C. Blum, also known as Dick, co-founded Blum Capital Partners in 1975 and serves as its Chief Executive Officer, President, general partner and Chairman. He was previously Partner at the firm from May 2006 to December 2012. Mr. Blum is a Co-Founder of TPG Capital L.P. He is the Founder and Chairman of Richard C. Blum & Associates, Inc. He is the Founder and Chairman of the American Himalayan Foundation. He is also a founding member of the Council of Advisors to National Geographic International. He serves as an Honorary Consultant to Mongolia and the Kingdom of Nepal. Previously, he co-founded TPG Newbridge Capital in the early 1990s and has been its Co-Chairman since September 2001. Mr. Blum founded Blum Center for Developing Economies at the University of California. He founded the Global Economy and Development Center at The Brookings Institution. He also founded the Blum-Brookings Conference to develop policy research strategy and to work on individual projects. He served with Sutro & Co. for 17 years from 1958 to 1975 and served as various positions including director and major stockholder. Mr. Blum serves as Co-Chairman of the World Conference on Religion and Peace. He serves as Co-Chairman - Asia at TPG Capital. Mr. Blum has been a Director of KFB Newbridge Advisors, Co. since 2000 and KFB Newbridge Control Corp. since 2000. He serves as a Director Emeritus of Northwest Airlines Corporation. Mr. Blum is a Member of Investment Committee of Montgomery Street Partners, LLC. He has experience serving as a director of other companies and serves on the board of directors of Pacific Alliance Group Holdings Ltd. He has been a Director of The Regents of The University of California since 2002. He serves as a Director at Coral Growth Investments Limited and Egyptian Direct Investment Fund. He serves as a Member of the Governing Board at University of California. He serves as a Member of Advisory Board at The Endeavor Group, Inc. He serves as a Member of Advisory Board of the Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley. Mr. Blum serves as a Trustee of The Brookings Institution. He serves as a Member of Economic Advisory Council at URS Corporation. Mr. Blum serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees at American Cancer Society Foundation. He serves on the Boards of The California Academy of Sciences. He serves as a Board Member of the World Wildlife Fund and the Wilderness Society. He serves as Member of Economic Advisory Council of Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He serves on the board of trustees of The Asian Art Museum Foundation, The Carter Center, Central European University, Glide Foundation, The National Democratic Institute and The Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc. He served as the Chairman of the Board of Regents for the University of California. He served as the Chairman of CB Richard Ellis Services. He served as the Chairman of CBRE Group, Inc. from September 2001 to May 2014. He served as Vice Chairman of URS Corporation from 1975 to November 2005 and also served as its Director until November 2005. He served as an Independent Director at CBRE Group, Inc. from May 1993 to May 13, 2016. He served as a Member of Economic Advisory Council of Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He served as a Director of FRHI Holdings Limited. He served as a Director of Current Media, Inc. since May 2004. He served as a Director of National Education Corp., since 1987, Northwest Airlines, LLC from 1989 to January 2005 and Playtex Products, LLC since 1998. He served as a Director of Northwest Airlines Holding Corporation. He served as a Director of Triad Systems Corporation since 1992. He served as a Director of Standard Chartered Bank Korea Limited, Taft Broadcasting Corporation, Shaklee Corporation, Advanced Systems, Inc., Sumitomo Bank of California, Princeville Development Corporation and Myer Pty Ltd. He served on the boards of National Educational Corporation. Mr. Blum served as a Director at Glenborough Realty Trust Inc. since January 1998. He served as a Director at Korea First Bank Ltd. He served as a Director of Sutro & Co. until 1975. He was appointed as a Regent in 2002 by Governor Davis to a 12-year term from March 12, 2002 to March 1, 2014. He is active in numerous non-profit organizations. He has experience in the capital markets and securities business. Mr. Blum has long had philanthropic interests, primarily focused on global poverty and education. He was the recipient of UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business Alumnus of the Year Award in 1994. He was appointed by President Obama to be a member of the President's Global Development Council. Most recently, he was awarded the Haas School of Business' Lifetime Achievement Award. He received an Honorary Doctoral Degree from the University of San Francisco's McLaren College of Business in 2006. Mr. Blum holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration in 1958 and an MBA degree in 1959 from the University of California at Berkeley.

Corporate Headquarters

909 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94133

United States

Phone: 415-434-1111
Fax: 415-434-3130

Board Members Memberships

Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
Co-Chairman and Co-Founder
Trustee
Director
Director
Director
1998-Present
Director

Education

MBA 1959
University of California Berkeley
BSBA 1958
University of California Berkeley
Honorary Doctorate 2006
University of San Francisco

Other Affiliations

Annual Compensation

There is no Annual Compensation data available.

Stocks Options

There is no Stock Options data available.

Total Compensation

There is no Total Compensation data available.
\
Share:

The bad, bad homeless of America - Priced to poverty

Walnut Creek CA 

When I first saw this video it was clear the reporter was doing a job he was for the community.  What he didn't know about were homeless who are being run over via hit and run drivers.  By 2013, I had videos of several who'd been maimed for life.  

By the end of 2013 several were dead but he won't report on the dead homeless. For five years I watched one after another living on the streets being felled by the powerful.  

When you're homeless you have few options but when you're connected to a police scandal you're simply screwed.  People say you should be they're in prison but so far I haven't been able to recover my losses, my towed cars and it's clear I can't win in a Court Room as my witnesses have been killed or better my attorneys suffered fates from murders of relatives, family or they've been beaten good enough they left my case.  

One very critical witness worked for the Town of Danville where the Town of Danville hid the suspect to avoid service, wrote up a fake police report and then when officers from Danville were arrested were able to hide my story from the FBI.  




Share:

ARSONISTS AND FIRESETTERS


ARSONISTS AND FIRESETTERS
"Fire makes for a good servant, but a bad master" (Roger L'Estrange)   
    Arsonists are a varied group of offenders who come from different backgrounds, but the common denominator is that they take enjoyment out of seeing things destroyed by fire or burning.  They even take joy in the aftermath of a burning; i.e., after things have been burned.  The emphasis on burning is clearly evident in the FBI definition of arson as "any willful or malicious burning or attempting to burn, with or without intent to defraud."  As DeHaan (2002) points out, the burning is started with malice.  There is a specific intent to destroy property.  Likewise, the term "firesetting" (typically reserved for describing juveniles or adolescents) conveys a sense of malicious intent (usually in chronic, repetitive behavior) far greater than the term "fireplay" (typically reserved for young juveniles) which conveys a lesser degree of malice or intent (Putnam & Kirkpatrick 2005).  Note also that the law specifies "willful" in conjunction with malicious, so this means that, at least in terms of legal definitions, there is a presumption that all perpetrators of arson are sane.  

    That being said, most juvenile fire-setting is usually a product of antisocial personality (Forehand et al. 1991) while juvenile fireplay is usually a product of curiosity or recklessness (Cox-Jones et al. 1990).  Adult arson is usually a product of vanity or egocentricity (Orr 1989).  When the perpetrator is male, the motivation is more cold-blooded or instrumental; and when the perpetrator is female, the motivation is more hot-blooded, emotional, or affective (Gannon 2010).  Professor James Ogloff, director of the Centre for Forensic Science at Monash University in Australia, says the profile of a typical fire setter is male, late teens/early 20s, unattractive, unmarried, shy, socially isolated, and with lower intelligence.  About a third of perpetrators have co-morbid psychiatric conditions including schizophrenia, and mood and/or personality disorders (usually narcissism).  About half have prior criminal convictions.  One of the more curious clinical characteristics is the apparent lack of motive (typically reserved for the so-called pyromaniac).  No arsonist shows remorse, but only the pyromaniac lacks conscious motivation although they are fully aware of the acts they are committing.  It's as if their mind "blocks off" or conceals short-term memory of whatever rational thought they put into their devious plans.  For this reason, clinicians often characterize the motivation as a combination of pathological and non-pathological.    
    For both arsonists and fire setters, fire is an instrument of power and a weapon on choice.  It is the instrument they believe helps them get ahead in life or at least create a sense of control and/or power that they find absent in their lives.  It is for this reason that most perpetrators come from lower socio-economic backgrounds.  Such people look upon fire as the ultimate weapon, the kind which can be used for both instrumental and expressive purposes.  Setting a fire for instrumental purposes (to achieve a goal) has been less studied than setting fire to fulfill some pathological, expressive need.  It has been found that arsonists and firesetters have co-occurring psychopathologies, such as antisocial behavior, sexual promiscuity, substance abuse, and cigarette smoking; and that these correlates have far more predictive validity than the ones once thought associated, like bedwetting and cruelty to animals (Slavkin 2000).
     Most psychological profiles are drawn from clinical assessments of captured offenders (Kolko 2002), and by best estimates, may only account for 40% of all known offenders.  Also, it is usually admitted that significant overlap may exist between "types" of offenders.  For example, the clinical literature recognized four (4) types of firesetters, as follows:
  • curious -- uses fire out of fascination
  • pathological -- uses fire out of deep-seated individual dysfunction
  • expressive -- uses fire as a cry for help or to vent emotions
  • delinquent -- uses fire for antisocial or destructive ends      
     The most common overlap is between the expressive and delinquent types.  The distinguishing characteristic may be stress.  A truly "expressive" type would likely have accumulated enough stress in their life (or led an uneventful life) so that they seek to vent frustration.  However, such motives are also typically associated with vandalism and shoplifting, and it is unknown why some choose one path over another.  A truly "delinquent" type enjoys the power which comes from seeing a substantial reaction or response, such as the arrival of police and fire departments (Macht & Mack 1968).  Curious types can be easily persuaded about the dangers of firesetting.  Pathological types need treatment, and there is some controversy over what is the best mental health treatment.
     Among adult arsonists, pathological types are not impossible, but most typological efforts have been restricted to sorting out key types which are significantly different from the pyromaniac (Lewis and Yarnell 1951; Rider 1980), as follows:
  • jealousy motivated -- uses fire to get back at some insult to his vanity
  • pseudo hero -- uses fire to rush in and make a rescue, save a life, etc.
  • fire buff -- like a police groupie, only with firefighters
  • excitement oriented -- uses fire out of boredom (like the expressive type) and simple methods
  • pyromaniac -- uses fire repeatedly as a kind of neurotic obsessive-compulsive behavior      
PYROMANIA
    The definition of pyromania has changed considerably over time.  One of the many paradoxes in criminology is that pyromaniacs have long been seen as acting without any "apparent motive."  Clearly, it involves an impulse control problem, and often, a pyromaniac will tell you that they didn't really want to hurt anybody or destroy anything; they simply wanted to achieve their "high" of fascination by watching something burn.  There is much we don't understand about pyromaniacs.  Geller et al. (1997) say that to make a psychological diagnosis of one, they must meet five criteria:
  • deliberate firesetting on multiple occasions
  • tension or arousal before setting the fire
  • feeling of relief or pleasure while setting the fire or watching afterward
  • an intense interest or obsession with fire and its associated characteristics
  • absence of any other motivating factors (e.g., money, revenge) for setting the fire
    Holmes and Holmes (2009) provide a good overview of the common elements in the profile of a typical pyromaniac, adapted as follows:
Profile of a Pyromaniac
Age, Race, Gender, Intelligence ages 16-28, White, Male, range from mental defective to genius
Physical defects, Mental disorders frequently present, psychopathy, obsessive-compulsive pattern
Academic adjustment underachiever, some intellectual brightness, but performance marginal
Family background unhappy home life, harsh, inconsistent, or neglectful parenting
Social class background most from middle or upper levels, some lower
Social, marital, sexual adjustment severe interpersonal problems, poor marriages, sexual maladjustments
Occupational history resentful over only having had subservient positions
Criminal history delinquency, runaway, burglary, theft, other property offenses
Personality misfit, feeble, a physical coward, feelings of inadequacy, introverted, reclusive, lonely, wounded self-esteem, craving for power and prestige, inability to express remorse, ambivalent toward authority
Motives desire to be center of attention, render themselves useful, and show themselves clever
Triggering events accumulation of stress, frustration, tension, loss of employment, death of loved one, threat to sense of potency
     
Pyromaniacs typically set fires in haste or in a disorganized manner (although organized, older types exist who use elaborate incendiary devices), and are also known to enjoy setting off false alarms.  Their activity is nocturnal.  They have little regard for human life; i.e., it doesn't matter if the property is occupied or not.  At the time of setting the fire, pyromaniacs would describe a kind of trance-like state comes over them, almost as if they were controlled by an external force.  After setting the fire, pyromaniacs would describe a sense of relief.  Some enjoy playing detective at the fire scene.  Most, except for the jealousy-motivated or revenge-oriented types, will frequently return to the crime scene.  Some even turn themselves into the police.  They often readily confess or admit guilt, although they express no remorse or regret.  They are usually cooperative under arrest.

SERIAL ARSON
     Other researchers (Kocsis & Cooksey 2002) have tried to narrow down the profile of a serial arsonist.  There are not only many kinds of offenders, but multiple offenses by the same offender.  Arsonists typically commit nearly a hundred arsons before getting caught.  Numerous motives compel arson:  financial reward, politics, concealment of another crime, attention seeking, revenge, and anger.  A fundamental tenet of behavioral profiling is that if you know the what and why, the who will follow.  Therefore, sometimes behavioral profilers are called in to testify during an arson trial.  They usually present research findings which suggest a profile of the typical arsonist as someone who may be seriously mentally ill and/or intoxicated at the time of the offense, which can be argued as mitigating responsibility.  A full-blown pyromania defense (or claim of pyromania) doesn't work in court.  That's because, in the forensic setting, pyromania is quite rare.  It's far better to simply use the phrase "serial arsonist," but the characteristics for that are somewhat different.  Sapp et al. (1997) found most serial arsonists were white males around the age of 27, with a tenth grade level education and almost all had prior arrests and convictions. Below is a summary of the emerging profiling characteristics for serial arsonists:     

Profile of a Serial Arsonist
AGE: 10-14 (26%), majority under 18 (51%) if adult, late 20s, never over 35 if adult, revenge or profit motive
SEX: 9 out of 10 times (90%) a male; if female, revenge type
RACE: 3 out of 4 times (75%) a white; black (20%) of time if first-timer; Native Americans 3rd largest group
CLASS: majority from lower to working class; middle class if vandalism or excitement
IQ: vast majority subnormal (70-90) with 22% in retarded range (below 70), rare genius
FAMILY: absent or abusive father, history of emotional problems with family/mother; single (65%)
SCHOOL: learning problems and usually held back a grade in school, normally in 10th grade; younger (grades 6-8) if vandalism; despite lack of formal education, may be of average to above average intelligence however
PEERS: social misfit, interpersonal problems with opposite sex, appears physically and emotionally weak compared to peers; but often does manage to involve an accomplice in arson (20%)
WORK: usually chooses subservient position and then resents it (both ambivalent and resentful toward authority-repressed); unemployed if vandal, excite, or profit; otherwise a laborer
CRIMINAL HISTORY: numerous status offenses as juvenile, property crimes, almost all have arrest records
DRUG/ALCOHOL: not usually a problem, but involvement with
SEXUAL HISTORY: 25% report being homosexual or bisexual
MENTAL: lack of remorse may appear as psychopathy, but more typically result of obsessive-compulsive disassociative trance-like state during firesetting
ARREST: majority remain at crime scene except revenge, conceal, profit types; some (25%) attempt suicide in lockup; most easily confess thru cooperation

The SIX MAIN TYPES ACCORDING TO THE FBI CLASSIFICATION MANUAL:

ARSON FOR REVENGE (41%) - precipitating factor is a real or imagined affront that occured months or years ago; attack is focused on individual rivals, a business chain, schools, or some facilities connected with offender
ARSON FOR EXCITEMENT (30%) - precipitating factor is boredom, (sexual) thrill cycle, or need for attention; attack is focused on large or outdoor targets, like parks, construction sites, arenas, as well as residential areas
ARSON FOR VANDALISM (7%) - precipitating factor is family disturbance or peer pressure; attack if usually focused on educational facility as well as residences and outdoors
ARSON FOR PROFIT (5%) - precipitating factor is a recent financial loss which triggers an urge to cheat the insurance company, recoup a bad investment, or dispose of some depreciated assets
ARSON FOR CRIME CONCEALMENT (10%) - precipitating factor is a desire to cover up some other criminal activity, such as auto theft or murder
ARSON FOR EXTREMISM (7%) - precipitating factor is to further a social, political, or religious cause, or to burn down buildings associated with specific races or religions
    Serial arson is defined as an offense involving three or more fires with a significant cooling off period between the fires.  The exact length of this cooling off period is unknown.  Douglas et al. (1997:186-7) say the cooling off period may last days, weeks, or even years.  Serial arson is also different from double arson, triple arson, spree arson, and mass arson.  What all these different types have in common is the repetitive nature of the crime. 
SAMPLE INTERVIEW WITH A SERIAL ARSONIST
I (Interviewer): What do you think gets kids in trouble?
 O (Offender): From the minute they're a baby and they grow up they see what their family does and what their family does they're going to do.  Parents think they are helping a kid by beating them, but it makes them worse.
 I: Do you feel your problems stem from the way your father punished you?
 O: Yeah, for example, once when I was 6 or 7, I saw a can of red paint in the garage, and I drew a red stripe down the side of the neighbor's car.  Now I could see getting a spanking for that, but not for little things like "Hi Dad, what's for lunch?"  When I was little I was always asking questions, and Dad would just give me a smack and say "Don't bother me".
 I: What was your mother like? Did she love you?
 O: When I was 3 my mom left because he abused her. I saw him knock her teeth out, slam her against the wall, and he took me and my brother and rammed our heads together to knock us out.  Mom eventually came back all the time after stuff like this, but he was too abusive to let her show her love.
 I: Was peer pressure a factor is what you did {a string of 16 serial arsons aimed at business establishments, schools, and churches}?
 O: No, I wasn't talking much to anybody, but that's what I wanted to do. I wanted to be with the "in" crowd, but they were too rowdy.
 I: Have you experimented with drugs?
 O: I've seen kids commit murder and things like that while needing drugs, like crack.  I used to take it myself. You get high for about a minute or two, then depressed, and then it makes you feel dirty and not wanted and things like that. It makes you feel YUCK.
 I: Was lack of money a big problem with you and your family?
 O: You know, kids see themselves and their family not having much and other people having it and making it, and it's a strong feeling inside.  Everyone wants money, and there's all kinds of wrong ways to get it, but you can't get greedy, you know, or you'll get caught.
 I: What importance did school and church play in your life?
 O: School sucks and makes you stupider and stupider.  There ain't no learning going on.  Sometimes the teacher treats you like "Well, just sit there if your hands hurt and you can't write an assignment" or they give you something stupid to do just to get you out of their way.  Church never really was a factor in our family.  Mom was religious a bit, but we never went to church.
 I: What do you think causes a fascination with fire?
 O:  Well, it's probably a lot of things.  People telling you you're good for nothing, seeing everything around you getting worse and worse.  Torching a place kind of lets you feel good for awhile, like you're somebody important.  It's also a natural high in itself. You never know how bad it's gonna get and it does bring people out to clean up the community.
 I: Did you do it for the fun, revenge, or what?
 O: Different reasons. It's enjoyable, you know. Different people like to do different things.  Some like to steal or beat people up, and what I did helped me at the time to sort through what passes for a so-called life.  There's lots of other bad stuff I could've done, but I didn't.  There's a lot of work involved in picking a place to torch and how you're gonna do it.
 I: What do you think about the people you killed and hurt {One of the offender's fires killed a business owner who was sleeping inside; two fires resulted in serious injury}? Do you feel any remorse?
 O: They weren't supposed to be there, but if they were, they should've gotten out of the way.  I can't control everything, and I guess I'm sorry, but nobody understands the extremes you go through once you start doing this stuff and how solid your reasons are for doing it.
 I: What do you think would help prevent this kind of behavior in other people?
 O: I dunno, maybe more money poured into the community, less crazy stuff on TV.  You know, I can point to music videos and certain TV shows which helped give me ideas.  There's just too much bad stuff out there, and too few choices for anything else.
A COMPARISON OF ARSONISTS AND RAPISTS
 Arson
-Nation’s fastest-growing crime.
-50% of all fires (incendiary & suspicious), determined by ruling out other factors: electrical, accidential, natural, unknown
-Legal elements: burning, intent, malice
-Characteristics of "firesetters":
AGE: 10-14 (26%), majority under 18 (51%) if adult, late 20s, never over 35 if adult, revenge or profit motive
SEX: 9 out of 10 times (90%) a male; if female, revenge type
RACE: 3 out of 4 times (75%) a white; black (20%) of time if first-timer; Native Americans 3rd largest group
CLASS: majority from lower to working class; middle class if vandalism or excitement
IQ: vast majority subnormal (70-90) with 22% in retarded range (below 70), rare genius
FAMILY: absent or abusive father, history of emotional problems with family/mother
SCHOOL: learning problems and usually held back a grade in school, normally in 10th grade; younger (grades 6-8) if vandalism
PEERS: social misfit, interpersonal problems with opposite sex, appears physically and emotionally weak compared to peers
WORK: usually chooses subservient position and then resents it (both ambivalent and resentful toward authority-repressed); unemployed if vandal, excite, or profit
CRIMINAL HISTORY: numerous status offenses as juvenile, property crimes, almost all have arrest records
DRUG/ALCOHOL: no problem
MENTAL: lack of remorse may appear as psychopathy, but more typically result of obsessive-compulsive disassociative trance-like state during firesetting
ARREST: majority remain at crime scene except revenge, conceal, profit types; some attempt suicide in lockup; most easily confess thru cooperation
TYPES other than concealers or for profit (who constitute 22% of total):
ARSON FOR REVENGE (41%) - precipitating factor is a real or imagined affront that occured months or years ago; attack is focused on individual rivals, a business chain, schools, or some facilities connected with offender
ARSON FOR EXCITEMENT (30%) - precipitating factor is boredom, (sexual) thrill cycle, or need for attention; attack is focused on large or outdoor targets, like parks, construction sites, arenas, as well as residential areas
ARSON FOR VANDALISM (7%) - precipitating factor is family disturbance or peer pressure; attack if usually focused on educational facility as well as residences and outdoors
ARSON FOR PROFIT (5%)
ARSON FOR CRIME CONCEALMENT (17%)
 Rape
-One of world’s first felonies; for many years, only crime to have a nonconsent factor; filled with cultural overtones
-Statistics misleading: time clock method estimates beating against woman every 20 seconds, rape every 20 minutes
-Apprehension rates high and conviction rates low
-Nonreporting problem before "shield laws"; estimates were that less than 10% of rapes were reported
-Fairly constant 15% false reporting rate
-Characteristics of rapists:
AGE: 75% under age 25, 80% under age 30; over 30 if sadistic type
SEX: male normally 100% of the time
RACE: Vast majority are black (75-90% of rapists in prison are black); crime tends to be intra-racial; rapists are usually unarmed; 1 in 4 times (25%) uses a knife or instrument.
CLASS: majority are from poverty-lower class backgrounds
IQ: majority in normal range 90-110
FAMILY: sibling history more important than family history, may have been sibling bed sharing, overt sexual behavior in family with siblings and/or (sadistic) mother; lack of support from (absent) father; temper tantrums as child
SCHOOL: usually no learning problems and typically a high school graduate; some college possible; discipline problems likely, most likely involving pornography interest
PEERS: mild to moderate social maladjustments, but normally one of the "boys"; tries to cultivate a reputation as a tough fighter, but known as a punk and low life to many; usually married, divorced, or lives with a women, in that order, but has demonstrated poor relations with women
WORK: majority work reliably around women; lack self-confidence to improve self; if sadistic, takes better job
CRIMINAL HISTORY: majority are successful at avoiding this; average of 2.5 priors, only 2 years served on each
DRUG/ALCOHOL: noted problems in this area
MENTAL: antisocial personality; defines self as normal in every way except sexually, where suffers a known philia or mania; ritualism may border on psychotic with sadistic type
ARREST: frequently leaves clues with victim; plays games with police; difficult to get confession
TYPES based on Hale’s research, not Scully’s:
POWER REASSURANCE (30%) - precipitating factor is lonliness and lack of self-esteem on 7-15 day cycle; neighborhood nonviolent attacks; keeps souvenirs, thinks victim liked it
POWER ASSERTIVE (30%) - precipitating factor is desire to dominate an impersonal sex partner on 20-25 day cycle; cruises singles bars, acts macho; may repeat on same victim
ANGER RETALIATION (24%)- precipitating factor is perceived injustice at hands of women on 6-12 month cycle; sees self as athletic and masculine, action-oriented; uses blitz attack
SADISTIC (16%)- precipitating factor is need to express fantasy; compulsive in personal appearance; carries rape kit; learns better ways to stalk, and will eventually kill
PRINTED RESOURCES
Cox-Jones, C., Lubetsky, M., Fultz, S. & Kilko, D. (1990). "Inpatient psychiatric treatment of a young recidivist firesetter." Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 29(6): 936-41.
DeHaan, J. (2002). Kirk's Fire Investigation, 5e. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Douglas, J., Bergess, A., Burgess, A. & Ressler, R. (1997). Crime classification manual. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Forehand, R., Wierson, M., Frame, C., Kempton, T. & Aristead, L. (1991). "Juvenile firesetting: A unique syndrome of an advanced study of antisocial behavior." Behavioral Research Therapy 29: 125-28.
Gannon, T. (2010). "Female arsonists: Key features, psychopathologies and treatment needs." Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes: 73, 173-189.
Geller, J. McDermeit, M. & Brown, J. (1997). "Pyromania? What does it mean?" Journal of Forensic Science 42(6): 1052-57.
Holmes, R. & Holmes, S. (2009). Profiling Violent Crimes: An Investigative Tool, 4e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Holt, F. (1994). "The arsonist profile." Fire engineering, March: 127-28.
Inciardi, J. (1970). The Adult Firesetter: A Typology. Criminology 8: 145-55.
Kocsis, R. & Cooksey, R. (2002). "Criminal Psychological Profiling of Serial Arson Crimes." International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46:631-656.
Kolko, D. (Ed.) (2002). Handbook on firesetting in children and youth. Boston: Academic Press.
Lentini, J. (2005). Scientific Protocols for Fire Investigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lewis, N. & Yarnell, H. (1951). Pathological firesetting (pyromaniac) (Vol. 2). NY: Cooporidge Foundation.
Macht, L. & Mack, J. (1968). "The firesetter syndrome." Psychiatry 31: 277-88.
Midkiff, C. (1982). "Arson and Explosion Investigation" in R. Saferstein (ed.) Forensic Science Handbook, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Moenssens, Starrs, Henderson & F. Inbau. (1995). Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
Orr, J. (1989). "Profiles in arson: The vanity firesetter."  American Fire Journal, July: 24-27.
Parenteau, R. (2012). "Serial arson." Pp. 124-144 in K. Borgeson & K. Kuehnle (eds.) Serial Offenders. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Putnam, C. & Kirkpatrick, J. (2005). "Juvenile firesetting: A research overview." OJJDP Bulletin [pdf available online]
Rider, A. (1980). "The firesetter: A psychological profile." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 49: 7-17.
Sapp, A., Huff, T., Gary, G. and Icove, D. (1994). "A motive-based offender analysis of serial arsonists." Interfire website.
Slavkin, M. (2000). "Enuresis, firesetting, and cruelty to animals: Does the ego triad show predictive validity?" Adolescence 36(143): 461-66.
Last updated: Mar. 05, 2012
Not an official webpage of APSU, copyright restrictions apply, see Megalinks in Criminal Justice
Citation: O'Connor, T.  (2012). "Arsonists and Firesetters,"  MegaLinks in Criminal Justice. Retrieved from http://www.drtomoconnor.com/4050/4050lect04a.htm.

Share:

ANKA Services - Not Every Homeless Person is on Drugs

Drug Counseling 

When the first of many tickets arrived I was astounded at the endless traffic stops, the unlawful searches, stops and baseless allegations of theft, drug sales and possession of stolen property.  That pattern followed me over the Contra Costa County Superior Court where Judge Joel Gulob heard my scenarios of being beaten by a Danville Building Inspector but Joel had children at same schools my sons attended which was Green Valley Elementary School in Danville.

Instead of getting a fair judgment Joel slammed me with fines that are now $15,000 or more.  That was a show stopper as by 2008 my license was suspended and the bank came for my van.  Thanks another unionized County Employee at Child Support a staffer there deliberately lost my paperwork.  Please add $9,000 for repossessed van.

Then over at ANKA Services I spent 18 months following the party line, sitting in drug rehab classes that I didn't need presented by another recovery.  Over and over I stated I was not on drugs.  The ANKA system is about one size fits, fee generation and self-serving interests again administered by unionized county workers.  Much of has happened to me could easily be a Anti-Trust where the officers, judges and county staff all know the value of each ticket so the automatic Civil Assessment Fee which can be manipulated stacks up against the constituent.

Please read about the Deadly Hit and Run incidents - Friends of the courts being the unionized workers

The system works we're on Welfare

  • I am homeless, 
  • I am on welfare
  • My sons are - their future is ruined 
  • My ex are all on welfare 
The Unionized Homeless Court

Since we're homeless that means we are living below the Poverty Line where we've all been convicted via Trial By Declaration in Absentia based on Penal Code section 1214.1(b) which allows a ten day notice which turns to whammy bammy fines.  

One aspect of homeless is getting your mail. The unionized workers who most likely rarely get fines or tickets have homes, income and cars.  There is no way they get the same deal as the rest of us. The forgiveness model is worthless when you're struggles are food, transportation and shelter. 

It's the first ever Poverty Maker Fine - fine em' until you've bled them dry. 


The Collections Business Model 
AllianceOne.com is the place to go to pay off the man.  You had a run of bad luck, you didn't have money when you should have, you failed to appear or more likely is you apparently gave up.  

You should invite your Assembly Member or State Senator to attend your next hearing so the can watch you get economically slaughtered but if you're on food stamps make sure you tell the judge and your elected officials.  Most don't listen as they're planning to be at the next banquet.  


A preliminary check reveals over 600,000 residents in collection and so a one minute error has cascades to a harsh inequitable sentence now lasting over ten years with at least another seven on my credit report. But the omnipetent CalPERS kids go to the best colleges, schools and we're their personal piggy bank. My issues are different my adversaries are cops in prison.




View details »

ANKA Is Fee Generation

This one size fits all policy is a joke.  The staff lack credentials but clearly after attending the homeless hoedown summer 2012 absolutely every person I connected with never followed up.

With the recent inmate death of my homeless friend David Bremer and homeless acquaintance John Newman beat to death around the corner from
If this system functioned both Bremer and Newman would be alive but check my homeless victims page for the other cases I've researched on.  
Gulag Numbers Crunchin'

Lost Files 

It's bad enough getting completely screwed by Judge Golub but looking at the historical issues of murder, arson, extortion and the Hobbs Act Violations that The CNET  Players have additional unidentified suspects aiming to take me down.

I am taking my complaints above the County but since I'm homeless technically any elected official can be called.  I'm either going there or have lived their as I'm the homeless man kicked from one town to the next.

The lost files - after John Newman was murdered in March 2012 I returned to ANKA services vehemently express my concerns about John's murder.  My files vanished shortly thereafter.

I need a license so my sons don't end up on the street.
View details »



Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts