UPDATE: WCPD Officer Pleads No Contest to Beating Woman with Baseball Bat in Richmond

Bennett posts about Walnut Creek Officer Thompson on September 8, 2014, then on September 23 addresses Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, then on September 27, 2014 someone murders five of his relatives

UPDATE: WCPD Officer Pleads No Contest to Beating Woman with Baseball Bat in Richmond

SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 16:21 PM · 55 COMMENTS

A Walnut Creek police officer pleaded no contest in a Martinez courtroom this afternoon to charges that he donned a mask and beat a woman with a baseball bat in Richmond last month.

Gregory Thompson, a 54-year-old Martinez resident and 30-year Walnut Creek police veteran, entered the no contest pleas in Contra Costa County Superior Court to charges of felony assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, felony vandalism and being armed in the commission of the crimes.

Dressed in a suit and tie, Thompson appeared out of custody next to his attorney in court today, weeks after bailing out of county jail in Richmond following his Aug. 16 arrest.

Thompson refused to answer questions from reporters outside the courtroom this morning and left in a waiting car.

Deputy District Attorney Barry Grove said prosecutors will ask for a one-year county jail sentence for Thompson but that he could face up to five years in state prison. His sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 10.

Grove said Thompson went to his father’s vacant home on Clinton Avenue in Richmond in the early morning hours of Aug. 16, knowing that the house had been burglarized recently, according to Grove.

When he saw an unknown woman walking near the home, he believed she was an intruder, donned a ski mask and “he took the law into his own hands and beat her with a baseball bat,” Grove said.

The woman’s car had run out of gas and she was walking in the area when Thompson attacked, prosecutors said.

Richmond police received several reports around 2 a.m. on Aug. 16 of a woman screaming and a man with a bat in the 4000 block of Clinton Avenue.

As officers arrived on the scene, witnesses pointed out Thompson, who was sitting nearby in his parked car. He wasn’t wearing his police uniform or in a patrol car at the time, police said.

Officers approached the suspect and noticed a mask lying on the car’s floorboard. A search of the car turned up a baseball bat, two guns and zip ties, police said.

The victim, who had been hiding in the bushes until police arrived, was taken to a hospital for injuries suffered in the beating and is expected to recover.

Police last month were attempting to locate a second woman who was apparently wounded when she stepped in to try to stop the attack. An off-duty firefighter also witnessed part of the attack, according to Grove.

Thompson, who identified himself as a police officer, was arrested, taken to county jail and released on bail the following day.

Walnut Creek police have said Thompson was put on paid administrative leave soon after his arrest and that the department is conducting its own investigation.

He was working most recently as a patrol officer, according to Walnut Creek police Capt. Mark Perlite.

Walnut Creek police officials were not immediately available this afternoon to comment on Thompson’s employment status.

Cartman September 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM: Boil him.
Jesse September 8, 2014 at 5:00 PM: He retired from WCPD on Friday.
Smile WC September 8, 2014 at 5:01 PM: Good time to retire.
GV pilot September 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM: Typical
Dorothy September 8, 2014 at 5:17 PM: Good grief. At least he isn’t trying to say he’s innocent.
really September 8, 2014 at 5:19 PM: He retired with a pension?
The Theorist September 8, 2014 at 5:20 PM: B__$H!7 … Double check his DNA against the database. Check all unsolved cases. His “story” stinks. If he wasn’t interrupted, she would have been hog tied and gagged in his trunk and dumped (alive/dead) who knows where after being brutally beaten and raped.
The zip ties give it away. IF he was just exacting some vigilante justice… what was he going to do? Zip tie them and leave them for police? Nope, they could still get away and identify him. Zip tie them and wait for police? Nope, he risks what happened, being arrested.
Let hope it’s thoroughly (properly) investigated and his blue shield doesn’t get him a free pass like in Concord, you know, in the interest of justice.
bumper morgan September 8, 2014 at 5:21 PM: He did the right thing. Took responsibility for his actions.
Julio September 8, 2014 at 5:44 PM: He could care less. He has his pension guaranteed. It should be taken away permanently. Paid administrated leave should be eliminated. After an officer is cleared he can get back pay. These guys have to be stopped. They are not above the law any more than these football or baseball players.
Anonymous September 8, 2014 at 5:53 PM: What an embarassment to the good police officers out there!
Saint September 8, 2014 at 5:53 PM: Since they have been taking away the Crown Vic’s and giving them soccer mom SUV’s to drive, I think all the cop’s are pissed off.
Sick Of It September 8, 2014 at 5:53 PM: Just for chits and giggles I’d like to know the whole story, no matter how twisted, how far over the line he must have “a reason”.

“Retired” AKA receiving a 30 year pension, medical and COLA huh?

This stinks to high hell. As a firm supporter of Law Enforcement this guy doesn’t need jail time as much as the community needs his pension distributed to a worthy cause.
Coggins Square September 8, 2014 at 5:59 PM: This is so shocking. I met Officer Thompson many years ago, and found him to be a very friendly and caring person, and dedicated police officer. In fact, I think he actually used to be a D.A.R.E. officer but I could be mistaken. Also, 30 years with one department is a long time.
mary September 8, 2014 at 6:17 PM: a year in county jail?? Jesus why not just slap his hands and take his bat away from him!!??? he deserves at least 5 years!! and to pay her off – NOT the taxpayers!!!
Harassed Family September 8, 2014 at 6:34 PM: Greg Thompson has in the past verbally harassed my family. Calls, complaints to the police department were not acknowledged. While I am so glad he should his true self and no one can suffer from him anymore, I am so sorry for that woman. Today is a good day.
Anon September 8, 2014 at 6:52 PM: Am sure she will have a very good civil lawsuit against him…
Cautiously Informed September 8, 2014 at 6:56 PM: Julio,
Guaranteed pension for someone who commits a crime? Not quite. The system is crazy, but not that crazy.
Blink September 8, 2014 at 7:09 PM: Sick sick sick…..that he retires with pension….sick
If criminal activity that should forfeit pension….
Pete Bennett September 8, 2014 at 7:19 PM: Hey Greg,

Remember me from Dallimonte’s bar? You know when where I used to sing Karaoke every Friday, where my Karaoke DJ Friend Ian Lotta Scott suddenly died in 2011 in one what I told the FBI was suspicious, seems you, Kenny B, former San Francisco Police Officer Lt. David Oberhoffer (Ret), and numerous other cops hung out.

I wanted to let you know I’ve been blogging and I know that Randy W. hangs there, as is did someone connected to Peter Branagh, and several BART officers now deceased.

My best bet is you, and others rigged the PG&E Gas Explosion along with Benny Chetcuti Jr. Chris Butler, Commander Wielsch and others.

Since you live near Virginia Hills Martinez which is where you tried to attack me last summer when I reminded you that it was the same cops all along for me going back to 2001 where my attorneys offices burned down.

Seems like to me there is a plethora of events on my blogs linked to you and other Walnut Creek Officers.

First Greg, tell me if you know Alicia Driscoll as you’d be the right age to have dated her. I knew and who ever investigated her case knows I knew her.

http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/mary-alicia-driscoll-murder-
suicide-i.html
Mr Benny Chetcuti Jr.
http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/03/benny-chetcuti-jr-walnut-creek-real.html

The Black Mercedes leads to you and I know that now, that leads to the my 2011 hit and run that leads to the death of Gary Collins who leads to attorneys connected to several deaths connected to Chris Butler.

http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/04/kaitlyn-brittany-stand-oct-24-1988-may.html

You covered your name at Dallimonte’s as Greg Fish but once your picture appeared in the news I realized the connections.

http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-cnet-players-coconspirators-and.html

Did you steal my laptop just 1/4 mile from WCPD then return it to me after you copied the same Data with PG&E?

http://gaspipelineexplosions.blogspot.com/2014/09/125×125.html

This was another Murder of my attorney’s brother in law – 2012 – Oberhoffer has copies of my divorce files which means you might have your own copies.
http://gaspipelineexplosions.blogspot.com/2014/09/murder-by-accident-nathaniel-greenan.html

http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-cnet-players-coconspirators-and.html
Investor Fraud Summit but isn’t Rossmoor WCPD Jurisdiction – how come you weren’t invited?

http://cnetscandal.blogspot.com/2014/08/investor-fraud-summit-walnut-creek.html

Pete Bennett
Homeless (Nov 2010 to 2014)
Walnut Creek CA 94596
P: (510) 460-5641

PS: You cost me a contract worth $500,000, my offices, family and my inheritance but
Pete Bennett September 8, 2014 at 7:24 PM: Folks this is the real story – we have thirty years of Arson cases with numerous murders – you better check his house for my computers, systems and legal documents as several of my clients have died since 2010 when I was forced to flea the area over death threats.

► Check his emails for connections to Attorney’s suing PG&E, Kinder Morgan and TWA Flight 800 but send a real bomb squad to sniff for C-4 Explosives that smell like Chris Butler and Commander Wielsch.

► The Plaintiff’s Winners Circle ◄
FBI is well informed – get ready
LONG FORGOTTEN
There was an arson / murder next to my house in 1979 (est),
Caldecott Tunnel (1982)
Oakland Fire (1991)
Mauzy Bldg (1982)
Cabbage Patch (1979)
TWA Flight (1995)
Lynchings (2) (1986)

http://gaspipelineexplosions.blogspot.com/2014/05/walnut-creek-domestic-terrorism-unit-wc.html
Rob September 8, 2014 at 7:41 PM: Give this guy his bat and put him in an elevator with Ray Rice – leave the camera rolling and charge for the event – and then drop the elevator from 20 stories up at the end..
Dr Doc PhD September 8, 2014 at 7:49 PM: #19 and #20 is a guy who shows up at Walnut Creek with paranoid and delusional rants and raves.

I recall it was a $1 million loss a few weeks ago. Reminder: You have to keep your stories straight to have any credibility. Nyuk. Nyuk. Nyuk.

One burger short of a Happy Meal?

Black helicopters!
Does that burger taste funny? Better check !!!
Look both ways before crossing street.
Beware of 4-door sedans with dark tinted windows.
Note men in three-piece suits and dark sunglasses.
PH dad September 8, 2014 at 7:57 PM: Uh Mayor,

I think someone is off their meds…
Alex Jones September 8, 2014 at 8:07 PM: As anyone ever seen Pete Bennett and TinFoiler at the same time? I’m guessing not!
Elwood September 8, 2014 at 8:22 PM: Pete Bennett is a bull goose loony!
Tom September 8, 2014 at 8:26 PM: If you plead “no contest”, you can’t be sued in a civil lawsuit.

I don’t know if cops lose their pension in CA if convicted of a felony, but they will retire (over being fired) to try to lock it in. If he’s eligible, forfeiture proceedings.

Pete Bennett………..thanks for sharing. I wish you well.
joebob September 8, 2014 at 9:05 PM: Paid administrative leave??? Is that the WCPD response to an off-duty officer beating an innocent woman with a bat? No wonder cops are out of control. The system covers for them.
Anonymous September 8, 2014 at 9:12 PM: He will get his pension. Being convicted of a felony applies as far as CalPERS is concerned when the act occurred and when the felony conviction occurs forward. He retired right away so he will get his pension which with his years of service should be 90% of final compensation.
HEY BONILLA AND DESAULNIER September 8, 2014 at 11:01 PM: How about crafting a new law that wipes out TAX-PAYER PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE—or at least recover every f’king cent—when public servants are found to break THE LAW? Why should MY TAX DOLLARS provide for paid time off time and time again??????????????????????????????????
Cracky McGee September 9, 2014 at 4:34 AM: And this is why I want to move to Canada
GetTheFactsStraight September 9, 2014 at 5:33 AM: Tom is wrong. A no contest plea can be used against you in a civil suit and actually introduced to a jury if you plead no contest to a felony. A no contest plea has the exact same consequences as a guilty plea in a felony. In a misdemeanor case, a no contest plea may not be later introduced to a jury as an admission of responsibility. Either way, such a plea does not prevent you from being sued.
captain obvious September 9, 2014 at 6:05 AM: Don’t know you but Thank you for 30 years of service. Too bad it ended how it did. Enjoy retirement. Thank you for doing what 99% of people don’t do by not dragging out the legal process.
Mee September 9, 2014 at 6:19 AM: @Above- A year in county jail? Has he been sentenced already? Just asking.
shadowblade September 9, 2014 at 6:45 AM: GetTheFactsStraight #31

Mostly correct. A guilty plea admits wrongdoing, and can be used against a defendant in a civil trial. The no contest plea places the burden of proof on the plaintiff in a civil trial.

In criminal trials, the guilty and the no contest pleas carry the same weight.
@ Tom September 9, 2014 at 6:51 AM: When you plead “no contest” , that plea cannot be used against you as an admission of guilt if a civil proceeding arises out of the same conduct from which the criminal prosecution was based.

If pleading “No Contest” prevented you from being sued than everyone would do it and there would be no lawsuits.

The amount of blatant ignorance of the law that people state as fact is simply amazing to me. If you don’t know, keep your mouth shut.
Anon September 9, 2014 at 9:06 AM: If he is guilty NO RETIREMENT FUNDS.
clg September 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM: @Pete Bennett
Mr. Bennett you sound like you need to dry out.
I wish you the best, but please get the help you need before you harm someone or yourself.
Anon September 9, 2014 at 9:55 AM: Curious as to why he stuck around at the scene of the crime…the news reported when Richmond PD showed up, he was sitting in his car, and the victim was hiding in a bush. Kind of weird he did not leave the scene after he attacked her. Anyone know the answer to this?
@captain obvious September 9, 2014 at 10:12 AM: Are you kidding me, this piece of crap deserves nothing. No thanks, no praise, no honor. He pissed on his badge and every badge of every good officer out there. Just like the church has some bad priests the police also has their scum. He does not represent the whole force. Put him in with the general population for at least five years. Im sure he had many charma points he needs to payoff.
Tom September 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM: I stand corrected. I understand how “no contest” works. I believe people plead “no contest” from the advice of their attorney, to try to avoid a civil lawsuit. There’s a difference.

This is what I’ve been told by people in the legal profession, and I believe it’s correct. This is a blog, not a court of law.

Thank you for correcting me…….
All the painters out there September 9, 2014 at 10:32 AM: All the people posting here are painters…they paint this guy with the brush of damnation. Out of the woodwork you come, cop bashing. They are all evil.

Look. This guy “manned up” and admitted his sins. Most other high and mighty, sports celebrities, and your common gang member..all plead NOT GUILTY. This didn’t happen . He basically said “I DID IT”.

No pension? Why? So YOU go through your job for 30 years, whatever that job is. You get drunk (evil you!) and kill someone, or hurt someone in a wreck. Yes, you are wrong. Look at the recent DUI crashes reported here on Claycord. Yes you should go to prison. But does that give anyone the right to erase forever your past earnings? How about let’s just seize your property, home, car, bank account, and throw you in a hole.

This is America. Guilty until proven…and “cruel and unusual punishment” shall not be imposed.

This guy stupidly nutted up one night, likely out of frustration from being repeatedly victimized..and he “lost it” and did the unthinkable.

Yes. He should go to jail..and he’s forever ruined his name, and gave all his law enforcement brethren a black eye. This “feeds” you painters who ooze out of the woodwork.

Let the man pay his penalty and suffer the consequences. But we don’t crucify him. Leave that to ISIS.
Again September 9, 2014 at 10:43 AM: Dr.DocPhd, I sincerely hope you’re not a cop and making fun of a person who could possibly be mentally ill? There are hundreds of people who suffer from mental illness in many forms for many reasons, and if you are a representative paid for by the city of Walnut Creek then you should be completely ashamed of yourself. Your statement is equivalent to a student being bullied and also makes you and the Walnut Creek police department look pretty bad. Kind of supports that this particular police officer thought he could take the law into his own hands, you feel that way too?
jtkatec September 9, 2014 at 12:15 PM: Why would a police office take such a violent action? Beating a woman with a baseball bat? He’s an officer of the law, why won’t he just call the officer’s of that jurisdiction, tell them he’s also a police officer and has reason to believe a woman just burglarized his father’s house?. Or he could have just made a citizen’s arrest.

The actions he took do not sound like the actions of a rational person.
Princes September 9, 2014 at 3:05 PM: @ captain obvious # 39. You don’t know what your talking about . Be nice and look at your self in the mirrow. Maybe with all the hate you have they should lock you up. He is the most respectful police officer you ever meet. I will always be so proud of him for the amazing job he has Done for the walnut creek police department.
Captain Obvious September 9, 2014 at 4:43 PM: @#39. 30 years of service as a Officer, Deputy, Corrections Officer etc is not an easy task for any HUMAN. Show me proof that this wasn’t an isolated incident and I might change my tune.

30 years experience and he stays at the scene with the evidence? Yes he snapped and yes he should no longer be a cop. Does he deserve the pension he earned over the last 30 years…. ofcourse. He didn’t rape or kill anyone and until someone shows me proof this is his normal pattern………
Gregory September 9, 2014 at 5:38 PM: what is the point of beating someone while wearing a mask? to be anonymous. if you wanted to protect YOUR property, do you not agree that it would be best to let the person that you are protecting YOUR property against know that that is YOUR property and these are the consequences for over stepping YOUR boundaries?

what i see is not protection, its a very creepy and confusing assault.

to be fair, i also have zip ties in my vehicle. They make working on tge engine a lot easier in a pinch.
Gus September 9, 2014 at 6:17 PM: Princes, you are aware he just pleaded no contest to beating a woman who ran out of gas and was looking for help with a bat, right?

Or are you one of those nut jobs who marries guys on death row?

Assaulting a woman with a bat should be attempted murder. I hope she takes his entire pension.
PhilthyPHRESH September 9, 2014 at 6:30 PM: Great work, the police, you guys are doing a great job out here. Thank you.
Dr Doc PhD September 9, 2014 at 8:29 PM: @42

No.. never worked for government. I tune into city council and planning commission meetings because I am an informed citizen.

The Walnut Creek meeting videos are archived. Take a look as #19/20 in action. Go to the August 19 city council video at about 11 minutes into the meeting during public communications.

http://walnutcreek.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=12&clip_id=2236

You make up your own mind.
Background September 9, 2014 at 8:37 PM: Pensions nowadays are similar to 401k’s in that most people pay into them in addition to the employer (taxpayer). This is not unlike a company matching a 401 contribution. If a public employee commits a felony while on-duty they can lose their pension. Not an issue in this case.

For background the “victim” in this case was in his father’s backyard (likely to break-in again). This able bodied woman lives 100% on government assistance and happened to be wandering around at 2:00am with no good story why she was there. In addition to be under the influence she and her other friend, who also happened to be wandering around the area at 2:00am, chose to run off when police arrived. And by the time police arrived the assault was long since over. Bottom line is he was protecting his family’s property but went too far. Keep in mind this case would NEVER have been filed if he wasn’t a cop due to a lack of evidence and her inconsistent story. Not for me to say if that’s fair or not since cops should be held to a higher standard. He should never be employed as a cop again and should serve his punishment but this is far from the crime of the century it is made out to be by the media.
Judy September 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM: Isn’t hitting someone with a baseball bat a crime, regardless of circumstances? Or place of employment? You don’t have to be a cop to be arrested. You just have to commit a crime. Hmm.
PhilthyPHRESH September 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM: So didn’t he already have the law in his hands?
JWB September 9, 2014 at 9:20 PM: @ Background

“Pensions nowadays are similar to 401k’s in that most people pay into them in addition to the employer (taxpayer). This is not unlike a company matching a 401 contribution.”

Really you don’t know that there is a huge difference between a Defined Benefit Plan and a Defined Contribution Plan?
@ Background September 10, 2014 at 9:22 AM: I am a big supported of law enforcement and WCPD, but a couple of misstatements in your email. Police still have the traditional defined benefit plan in which the retiree is paid a portion of his salary for life. They may also have a defined contribution plan in which you contribute a portion of your salary and the employer matches it.

A huge misstatement is that your average person would not have been prosecuted for assaulting someone with a baseball bat, particularly at a residence that was NOT their home. No element of self-defense here. It does sound plausible that the woman was a squatter, and I have sympathy for this, as someone who dealt with a squatter next door recently. However, it never occurred to me to go after the squatter with a baseball bat. That is crazy town. I don’t see in this case, how the officer was held to a “higher standard” The charges actually seem a bit lenient. Baseball bat attacks are closer to attempted murder/manslaughter, but possibly part of a plea bargain.
Background September 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM: #55-I agree with you. Re: pensions you are correct however many public employees pay significant portions of their paychecks into their pensions every payday. Doesn’t seem fair to take away “their” money anymore than you would take someone’s contribution into a 401k if they commit a crime. I agree with you on taking the “public” money that is part of their defined benefit when a serious crime is committed (in most cases this taxpayer would be a majority of the pension).

This case wouldn’t have been filed not because he is innocent (I don’t know if he is or not but I suspect not). It wouldn’t have been filed because there are too many inconsistencies and there is very little evidence. The victim says she was attacked on the side of the house but he I’m sure claims the assault was mutual and occurred on or inside the house. Without overwhelming proof the DA normally would not file a case. Just because it’s a crime doesn’t mean your going to be prosecuted. In most cases you won’t be. Sad but true. Only when the case is a slam drunk will it get filed by the DA. This is just reality given the high caseloads. 98% of cases result in a plea bargain on the DA’s terms and never see a jury. This is because they are only the strong cases and everyone knows the justice system would grind to a halt if every case went to a full trial.

Judge Barry Goode - Argument for disbarment, connecting Walnut Creek Police, Contra Costa DA Mark Peterson in Kidnapping Conspiracy

Pete Bennett filed Move Away Protection Orders - the court clerk stated the judge didn't have time hear the motion.

Pete Bennett filed Move Away Protection Orders - the court clerk stated the judge didn't have time hear the motion setting in motion the Parental Abduction via Contra Costa Superior Court with help from Court Personnel.

The effective result was aiding and abetting parental abduction of the sons of Pete Bennett but also a co-conspirator in the numerous attempts on Bennett's life. In 2011, Bennett was followed by Santa Clara District Attorney investigators.

The most deliberately overlooked incident is when Bennett was traveling north on 680 several months before the deadly Kinder Morgan explosion in Walnut Creek CA. The divorce started filing was April, by June the explorer nearly flips then another

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project

Barry Goode

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Barry P. Goode (born April 11, 1948) is a judge in Contra Costa County, California, and a former federal judicial nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Early life and education[edit]

A New York native, Goode earned a bachelor's degree magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Kenyon College in 1969. He earned a law degree cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1972.^[1]

Professional career[edit]

Goode's first job out of law school was as a special assistant to U.S. Sen. Adlai Stevenson III of Illinois, from 1972 until 1974, when Goode then joined the San Francisco law firm McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen (now Bingham McCutchen), where he rose to become a partner. Throughout his 27-year career at the firm, he specialized in representing large corporations in environmental litigation. He also worked as an adjunct instructor of environmental law at the University of San Francisco.^[2] Goode left the firm in 2001 to join California state government.

Nomination to the Ninth Circuit[edit]

President Bill Clinton nominated Goode to the Ninth Circuit on June 24, 1998, to replace Charles Edward Wiggins, who had taken senior status.^[3] With the U.S. Senate under Republican control from that point until the end of Clinton's presidency, Goode's nomination languished, with no hearing scheduled or U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee vote for him. Despite the support for him from both of California's senators at that time, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, Goode's nomination was held up by one anonymous senator who had placed a hold on his nomination for unexplained reasons. Clinton renominated Goode on January 26, 1999, and renominated him again on January 3, 2001.^[2] On March 19, 2001, however, President George W. Bush withdrew 62 executive and judicial nominations made by Clinton in his final days as president, including that of Goode.^[4] Goode's nearly three-year nomination remains one of the single longest federal appeals-court judicial nominations never given a full Senate vote, behind those of Helene White, Henry Saad and Terrence Boyle.
In April 2003, President Bush nominated Carlos Bea to the Ninth Circuit seat to which Goode had been nominated. Bea was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in September 2003.^[5]

Work for California Gov. Gray Davis[edit]

On February 1, 2001, California Gov. Gray Davis named Goode as his secretary of legal affairs. Goode called the post an "important job," in an interview with the Metropolitan News-Enterprise newspaper in a story that was published on February 2, 2001. "I'm the kind of person who looks forward, not backward," he told the paper, referring to his expired federal judicial nomination.
During his time working for Gray Davis, Goode was the point person during two controversies. One involved a $95 million software contract with Oracle Corporation and Northrop Grumman that state officials rescinded in 2002 after critics charged that it would cost the state millions of dollars instead of generating the promised $100 million in savings.^[6] The other controversy involved power generator Duke Energy, which in 2001 was accused of gouging California.^[7]

Appointment to current judgeship[edit]

On November 11, 2003, just days before he left office after an unprecedented recall vote, Davis appointed Goode to serve on the Contra Costa County Superior Court.^[8] Goode's courtroom is located in Martinez, California, which is the county seat of Contra Costa County.

Personal[edit]

Goode lives in California.^[1] Goode has taught environmental law at the University of San Francisco School of Law.^[1]

See also[edit]

Bill Clinton judicial appointment controversies

Case FLMSD04-01638 - PAULA TARRANT VS PETER BENNETT

Case FLMSD04-01638 - Complaints/Parties

Complaint Number:	1
Complaint Type:	Pre-JBSIS Complaint/Petition
Filing Date:	04/02/2004
Complaint Status:	ACTIVE

Party Number

Party Type

Party Name

Attorney

Party Status

PETITIONER

PAULA LYNN TARRANT

Pro Per

Fees Waived

MINOR

WILLIAM BENNETT

RUPORT, DAVID O

MINOR

CHASE BENNETT

RUPORT, DAVID O

RESPONDENT

PETER CARVER BENNETT

Pro Per

DEFAULTED 05/04/2004

Complaint Number:	2
Complaint Type:	F.L. Petition
Filing Date:	04/21/2004
Complaint Status:	ACTIVE

Party Number

Party Type

Party Name

Attorney

Party Status

PROTECTED PERSON/PETITIONER

PAULA L. TARRANT

Pro Per

ASSIGNEE

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES

Exempt Agency

RESTRAINED PERSON/RESPONDENT

PETER C. BENNETT

Pro Per

Answer 05/07/2004

Case FLMSD04-01638 - Actions/Minutes

Viewed	Date	Action Text	Disposition	Image
	05/02/2018 4:58 PM DEPT. 39	DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 17 TO 39.	Not Applicable
	12/26/2014 3:29 PM DEPT. 17	DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 09 TO 17.	Not Applicable
	12/13/2012 5:05 PM DEPT. 09	DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 17 TO 09.	Not Applicable
	07/22/2011	REQUEST TO WAIVE COURT FEES FILED BY PETE BENNETT	Not Applicable
	07/22/2011	ORDER ON COURT FEE WAIVER AS TO PETER CARVER BENNETT IS GRANTED	GRANTED
	01/27/2010	NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD B Y DAX Y CRAVEN ON BEHALF OF PETER CARVER BENNETT WHO IS NOW APPEARING IN PRO/PER	Not Applicable
	01/27/2010	UPDATED CASE TO CHANGE ADDRESS OF PARTY PETER CARVER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	12/07/2009	NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ON/FOR 12/07/09 FILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING	Not Applicable
	12/07/2009	FAMILY LAW JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION (STATUS ONLY) FILED WITH EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12-07-09	Not Applicable
	12/03/2009 10:00 AM DEPT. 17	HEARING ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR BIFURCATION OF MARITAL STATUS ( PRO/PER)(ATTY)	GRANTED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	10/02/2009	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NTC OF MOTION, APPL FOR SEPARATE TRIAL, ETC. PETER C. BENNETT C/O DAX CRAVEN, ATTY OF RECORD 09/25/0	Not Applicable
	09/21/2009	HEARING ON MTN/OSC WAS SET FOR 12/03/09 AT 10:00 IN DEPT. 17
	09/21/2009	FAMILY LAW OSC/MOTION RE: BIFURCATION OF MARITAL STATUS FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
	09/21/2009	APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
	09/21/2009	ORDER FILED ON WAIVER OF FEES AS TO PAULA LYNN TARRANT IS GRANTED	GRANTED
	08/10/2009	WE CANNOT FILE/ISSUE YOUR MOTION FOR BIFURCATION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON:	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	07/31/2009	COPIES	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	06/09/2009	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: FILED COPY OF ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW TO DAZ CRAVEN,PAUL LYNN TARRANT ON 5-29-09	Not Applicable
	05/18/2009	ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEYS MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS MINORS COUNSEL & ATTORNEY FEES ORDER	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	03/25/2009 8:30 AM DEPT. 17	HEARING ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR W/DRAW AS MINORS CSL ( DAVID O RUPORT)(ATTY)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/17/2009	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND RELATED DOCUMENTS TO DAX CRAV EN; PAULA LYNN TARRANT ON 021109	Not Applicable
	02/10/2009	HEARING ON MTN/OSC WAS SET FOR 3/25/09 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 17
	02/10/2009	FAMILY LAW OSC/MOTION RE: W/DRAW AS MINORS CSL FILED BY CHASE BENNETT
	02/02/2009	NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF ATTORNEY DAVID O RUPORT FOR PETER CARVER BENNETT FOR PERIOD 04/16,04/17,04/24, 05/08-05/15, 06/12, 11/06/09 FILED	Not Applicable
	06/03/2008	NTC OF REGIS OF CA SUPP ORDR FROM BUTTE COUNTY RE: PETER CARVER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	04/21/2008	COPIES	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	04/11/2008	WILLIAM BENNETT, CHASE BENNETT ADDED AS A PARTY	Not Applicable
	04/11/2008	ORDER RE APPOINMENT IF COUNSEL FOR MINOR WITH CLER KS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FILED	Not Applicable
	03/28/2008	ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY SHIRLEY D JACOBS REPRESENTING PAULA LYNN TARRANT FILED; PARTY IS NOW REPRESENTED BY PRO/PER	Not Applicable
	03/28/2008	UPDATED CASE TO CHANGE ADDRESS OF PARTY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	03/28/2008 10:00 AM DEPT. 17	HEARING ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL ( SHIRLEY D JACOBS)(ATTY)	GRANTED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/25/2008	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NTC OF MTN PAULA TARRANT 02/21/08	Not Applicable
	02/25/2008	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NTC OF MTN, ETC DAX Y. CRAVEN 02/21/08	Not Applicable
	02/19/2008	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NOTICE OF MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL TO PAULA TARRANT ON 2-12-08	Not Applicable
	02/19/2008	HEARING ON MTN/OSC WAS SET FOR 3/28/08 AT 10:00 IN DEPT. 17
	02/19/2008	DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ATTORNEYS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FILED.	Not Applicable
	02/19/2008	FAMILY LAW OSC/MOTION RE: TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/11/2008	ORDER AFTER 12/06/07 HEARING RE: COURT SHALL APPOINT MINORS COUNSEL,CUSTODY, VISITATION MATTERS; COUNSELING & SIMILIAR MATT FILED	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	01/08/2008	COPIES	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	12/26/2007	DECLARATION RE: SERVICE OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DECLARATION OF DISCLOSURE FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	12/13/2007	ORDER AFTER 10/11/07 HEARING RE: VISITATION, PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION, CONTINUAN E, RELATED MATTERS FILED	Not Applicable
	12/06/2007 10:00 AM DEPT. 17	HEARING ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR MOD VISITATION; OST GRANTED ( PRO/PER)(ATTY)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	12/06/2007	PROOF OF SERVICE BY FACSIMILE OF RESP DEC TO OSC & SUPPORTING DOCS ON KIM HARRIS FILED; SERVED ON 10/16/07	Not Applicable
	12/05/2007	PROOF OF SERVICE BY FAX FILED RE: AMENDED RESPONDENTS STATEMENT, ETC. KIM HARRIS SERVED ON 12/3/07	Not Applicable
	12/03/2007	AMENDED RSP S STATEMENT FILED	Not Applicable
	12/03/2007	PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENTS DECLARATIO N DUE TO LACK OF SERVICE FILED	Not Applicable
	11/27/2007	RESPONDENTS STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ORDER AFTER HEARING ON OCTOBER 11,2007	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	11/26/2007	PETITIONERS DECLARATION RE: RESPONDENTS NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDERS--FILED	Not Applicable
	11/26/2007	SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FILED. PRO/PER SUBSTITUTES OUT AS ATTORNEY FOR PAULA LYNN TARRANT AND IS REPLACED BY SHIRLEY D JACOBS	Not Applicable
	11/15/2007	COPIES	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	10/11/2007	DEFENDANT PETER CARVER BENNETT ADDS ATTORNEY PRO/PER	Not Applicable
	10/11/2007	SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY FILED. PRO/PER SUBSTITUTES OUT AS ATTORNEY FOR PETER CARVER BENNETT AND IS REPLACED BY DAX Y CRAVEN	Not Applicable
	10/11/2007 10:00 AM DEPT. 17	HEARING ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR MOD VISITATION; OST GRANTED ( PRO/PER)(ATTY)	Complete
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	10/11/2007	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF SUPP DEC ON PETER CARVER BENNETT FILED. SERVED ON 10/06/07	Not Applicable
	10/05/2007	PETITIONERS SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FILED	Not Applicable
	09/28/2007	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: OSC, BLANK RESP DEC, DEC RE NTC OF EX PARTE APP ON RESPONDENT 09/20/07	Not Applicable
	09/14/2007	DECLARATION RE NOTICE UPON EX PARTE APPLICATION FO R ORDERS FILED	Not Applicable
	09/14/2007	HEARING ON MTN/OSC WAS SET FOR 10/11/07 AT 10:00 IN DEPT. 17
	09/14/2007	RESPONSIVE DECLARATION OF PETER CARVER BENNETT TO OSC OR NOTICE OF MOTION FIELD; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 10/11/07 AT 10:00 IN 17	Not Applicable
	09/14/2007	OSC (CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION RE: MOD VISIT; OST GRANTED FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	09/14/2007	FEE RECEIVED FOR FIRST PAPER FROM PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	09/12/2007	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF OSC;APPL;BLK RSP;DEC ON PETER C. BENNETT FILED. SERVED ON 09/10/07	Not Applicable
	09/07/2007	NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF ATTORNEY PRO/PER FOR PAULA LYNN TARRANT FOR PERIOD 11/01/07 - 01/03/08 FILED	Not Applicable
	06/22/2007	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING PETER BENNET SERVED BY MAIL ON 06/20/07	Not Applicable
	06/15/2007	FINDINGS & ORDER AFTER 04/23/07 HEARING RE: CUSTODY AND VISITATION AND RELATED ITEMS FILED.	Not Applicable
	04/23/2007 1:30 PM DEPT. 17	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: 1 HOUR LONG CAUSE HEARING.	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	04/17/2007	MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT IN SUPPORT OF PTRS MOVE AWAY REQUEST	Not Applicable
	04/17/2007	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: PTRS P&A IN SUPPORT TO PETER BENNETT ON 4/17/07	Not Applicable
	04/16/2007	FINDINGS & ORDER AFTER 02/20/07 HEARING RE: CUSTODY AND VISITATION, ADOPTION OF REPORT OF FAMI LY COURT SERVCIES, ISSUE LETTERS TO BE P FILED.	Not Applicable
	04/16/2007	RESPONSIVE DECLARATION OF PAULA LYNN TARRANT TO OSC OR NOTICE OF MOTION FIELD; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/20/07 AT 08:30 IN 17	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	04/12/2007	PETITIONERS DEC OF CONTESTED ISSUES FILED	Not Applicable
	02/20/2007	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING WAS SET FOR 2/20/07 AT 8:30 UPDATED TO 8:31 IN DEPT. 17
	02/20/2007 8:31 AM DEPT. 17	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: MOD CC,VISIT,OST(APPROVED)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/20/2007 8:30 AM DEPT. 17	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: MODIFY VISITATION (OST) TEMP DENIED	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/14/2007	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING WAS SET FOR 2/20/07 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 17
	02/14/2007	OSC (CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION RE: MOD CC,VISIT,RELATED ISSUES FILED BY PETER CARVER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	02/14/2007	APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY PETER CARVER BENNETT
	02/14/2007	ORDER FILED ON WAIVER OF FEES AS TO PETER CARVER BENNETT IS GRANTED	GRANTED
	02/02/2007	PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF OSC; BLANK RESP; UCCJEA; BLANK UCCJEA ON PETER CARVER BENNETT FILED. SERVED ON 02/02/07	Not Applicable
	02/02/2007	DECLARATION UNDER UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION ACT FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	02/01/2007	F/L SPECIAL SET HEARING WAS SET FOR 2/20/07 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 17
	02/01/2007	(F/L) FEE COLLECTED FOR EXPARTE ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HRG & SVC	Not Applicable
	02/01/2007	OSC (CUSTODY AND/OR VISITATION RE: MODIFY VISITATION (OST) TEMP DENIED FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	02/01/2007	RESPONSIVE DECLARATION OF PETER CARVER BENNETT TO OSC OR NOTICE OF MOTION FIELD; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 02/20/07 AT 08:30 IN 17	Not Applicable
	01/31/2007	APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
	01/31/2007	ORDER FILED ON WAIVER OF FEES AS TO PAULA LYNN TARRANT IS GRANTED	GRANTED
	01/04/2007 4:01 PM DEPT. 17	DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 186 TO 17.	Not Applicable
	08/23/2006	COPIES	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	05/02/2006	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: MINUTES & ORDER FILED ON 04-10-06 TO PETER C. BENNETT & PAULA L. TARRANT MLD ON 04-19-06	Not Applicable
	04/10/2006	MINUTES AND ORDER AFTER 04/10/06 HEARING FILED	Not Applicable
	04/10/2006 8:00 AM DEPT. 52	HEARING ON DCSS MTN/OSC TO/FOR HEALTH CARE ( CONTRA COSTA COUNTY)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	02/01/2006	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NOTICE OF MOTION FILED ON 01-30-06 TO PETER C. BENNETT & PAULA L. TARRANT MAILED ON 1-31-06	Not Applicable
	01/31/2006	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: ORD AFT HRG FILED ON 08-23-05 TO PETER C. BENNETT & PAULA LYNN TARRANT MAILED ON 01-24-06	Not Applicable
	01/30/2006	DCSS HEARING ON MOTION/OSC WAS SET FOR 4/10/06 AT 8:00 IN DEPT. 52
	01/30/2006	DCSS MOTION/OSC RE: HEALTH CARE FILED.
	12/28/2005	COPY(IES) AND CERTIFICATION(S)	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	12/27/2005	NOTICE OF/TO CHANGE OF ADDRESS FILED ON BEHALF OF PETER CARVER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	12/27/2005	UPDATED CASE TO CHANGE ADDRESS OF PARTY PETER CARVER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	12/13/2005 8:05 PM DEPT. 186	DEFAULT DEPARTMENT WAS CHANGED FROM 09 TO 186.	Not Applicable
	09/12/2005	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NTC RE PYMNT OF SPPT FILED ON 08-12-05 TO PAULA L. TARRANT & PETER BENNETT MAILED ON 08-18-05	Not Applicable
	08/23/2005	ORDER AFTER 12/08/04 HEARING RE: C/S SET FOR PETER BENNETT, FATHER FILED	Not Applicable
	08/23/2005	ORDER AFTER 08/11/04 HEARING RE: C/S SET FOR PETER BENNET, FATHER/CONT TO 128/04 @8 AM IN D9 FILED	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	08/12/2005	CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ADDED AS A PARTY	Not Applicable
	08/12/2005	NOTICE REGARDING PAYMENT OF SUPPORT, SUBSTITUTION OF PAYEE AND SUPPORT IS ASSIGNED FILED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY	Not Applicable
	12/08/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	HRG ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR CH SUPPT, SEEK WORK ORDER ( PAULA LYNN TARRANT)(PRO PER)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	12/08/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	F/L FURTH HRG/REVIEW RE: VSTN	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	08/11/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	HRG ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR CH SUPPT, SEEK WORK ORDER ( PAULA LYNN TARRANT)(PRO PER)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	08/11/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	F/L FURTH HRG/REVIEW RE: VSTN	Complete
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	07/21/2004	PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL FILED RE: NOTICE OF MOTION/APP FOR ORDER AND SUPPT DEC/ETC PETER BENNETT 07/19/04	Not Applicable
	07/13/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	HRG ON F/L MTN/OSC TO/FOR SET ASIDE DEFAULT ( PETER CARVER BENNETT)(PRO PER)	GRANTED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	07/13/2004	RESPONSIVE DECLARATION OF PAULA LYNN TARRANT TO OSC OR NOTICE OF MOTION FIELD; HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 07/13/04 AT 08:30 IN 09	Not Applicable
	07/02/2004	HEARING ON MOTION WAS SET FOR 8/11/04 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 09
	07/02/2004	FAMILY LAW OSC/MOTION RE: CH SUPPT, SEEK WORK ORDER FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
	07/02/2004	INCOME & EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	06/09/2004	HEARING ON MOTION WAS SET FOR 7/13/04 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 09
	06/09/2004	FAMILY LAW OSC/MOTION RE: TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT FILED BY PETER CARVER BENNETT
	06/09/2004	APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY PETER CARVER BENNETT
	05/13/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. 09	HEARING ON F/L OSC/TRO RE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ( PAULA L. TARRANT)(PRO PER)	COMPLETED
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	05/12/2004	STIPULATION & ORDER TO/FOR CRT ADOPTS MOU OF 05/04/04 RE CC/VSTN AS CRT ORDER FILED	Not Applicable
	05/07/2004	PROOF OF MAIL SERVICE OF ANSWER TO TRO ON PAULA LYNN TARRANT FILED. SERVED ON 05/07/04	Not Applicable
	05/07/2004	(U.J.) ANSWER TO F.L. PETITION FILED 04/21/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT FILED BY PETER C. BENNETT	Not Applicable
	05/04/2004	PETITIONERS COMMUNITY & QUASI COMM PROP DECLARATI ON	Not Applicable
	05/04/2004	DEFAULT ENTERED ON PRE-JBSIS COMPLAINT/PETITION FILED 04/02/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT AGAINST PETER CARVER BENNETT BY CLERK AS REQUESTED	Not Applicable
	05/04/2004	DECLARATION FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED DISSOLUTION (FC 2336) FILED	Not Applicable
	05/04/2004	REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT ON PETER CARVER BENNETT FILED; DATE COPY MAILED BY CLERK TO RESPONDENT: 050405	Not Applicable
	05/03/2004	(F/L) PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED ON F.L. PETITION FILED 04/21/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT AS TO PETER C. BENNETT (SERVED ON 04/21/04)	Not Applicable
	05/03/2004	(F/L) PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED ON PRE-JBSIS COMPLAINT/PETITION FILED 04/02/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT AS TO PETER CARVER BENNETT (SERVED ON 04/01/04)	Not Applicable
Minutes You are Not Authorized to View Minutes prior to 12/31/2099
	04/21/2004	INCOME & EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY PAULA L. TARRANT	Not Applicable
	04/21/2004	OSC/TRO RE: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FILED BY PAULA L. TARRANT	Not Applicable
	04/21/2004	F/L HEARING ON OSC/TRO WAS SET FOR 5/13/04 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 09
	04/21/2004	SUBSEQUENT PETITION TO/FOR DOMETIC VIOLENCE FILED BY PAULA L. TARRANT	Not Applicable
	04/19/2004	(F/L) PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE FILED ON PRE-JBSIS COMPLAINT/PETITION FILED 04/02/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT AS TO PETER CARVER BENNETT (SERVED ON 04/08/04)	Not Applicable
	04/02/2004	CASE ENTRY COMPLETE	Not Applicable
	04/02/2004	COLOR OF FILE IS RED	Not Applicable
	04/02/2004	(FAMILY LAW) SUMMONS ON PRE-JBSIS COMPLAINT/PETITION FILED 04/02/2004 OF PAULA TARRANT FILED	Not Applicable
	04/02/2004	DECLARATION UNDER UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION ACT FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT	Not Applicable
	04/02/2004	APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS FILED BY PAULA LYNN TARRANT
	04/02/2004	ORDER FILED ON WAIVER OF FEES AS TO PAULA LYNN TARRANT IS GRANTED	GRANTED
	04/02/2004	CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO DEPT. 09
	04/02/2004	PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION FILED. SUMMONS IS ISSUED	Not Applicable

Case FLMSD04-01638 - Pending Hearings

Date	Action Text	Disposition	Image
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings

CNET Scandal