The Anatomy of Public Corruption

Showing posts with label Big Tech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Tech. Show all posts

Accenture and Outsourcing


ALL RESULTS


Showing 1–10 of 6504 results



Electric Utilities Use Cost Management and Technology | Accenture


There is a powerful opportunity for electric utilities to use cost management and technology innovation to improve margins and fuel growth.


INSIGHTS


|


NOVEMBER 7, 2017


Schneider Electric Alliance | Accenture


Accenture and Schneider Electric formed a strategic alliance to bring new levels of innovation efficiency to the industrial sector. Read more.


INSIGHTS


|


MAY 27, 2019


Accenture and Gasunie Deploy New Digital Gas Transport Management System to Facilitate Safe and Secure Operation of Dutch Gas Grid | Accenture Newsroom


Accenture and Gasunie are deploying a new digital gas transport management system to facilitate operation of a Dutch gas grid.



MAY 8, 2019


General Electric | Accenture Alliance


Accenture and GE have formed a global alliance to help companies take advantage of data that is generated through their business operations.


ACCENTURE ALLIANCE


|


OCTOBER 21, 2014


Blockchain in Oil and Gas | Accenture


Accenture’s blog explains how blockchain enhances the future of procuring, tracking, and paying for products and services in the oil and gas industry. Read more.


BLOGS


|


MAY 13, 2018


Impact of Digital Technologies in Oil and Gas | Accenture


How will electric vehicles impact the oil and gas industry? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JANUARY 14, 2018


Chinese Electric Utility Implements SAP HANA | Accenture


Learn how one Chinese electric power company designed and deployed an SAP HANA-based data management and business intelligence solution with Accenture’s help.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


APRIL 17, 2018


Asset Management for Shaanxi Electric Power | Accenture


See how Accenture helped Shaanxi Electric Power enhance digital asset management for better visibility, information sharing and decision making. Read more.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


FEBRUARY 11, 2019


Oil and Gas Automation | Accenture


Robotic Process Automation can mimic the actions of consistent and detailed workers at a fraction of the cost for high-volume, repetitive tasks. Read more.


BLOGS


|


SEPTEMBER 16, 2018


Oil and Gas Refining | Accenture


How can you use technologies to build, operate and maintain refinery assets? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JUNE 9, 2019


Electric Utilities Use Cost Management and Technology | Accenture


There is a powerful opportunity for electric utilities to use cost management and technology innovation to improve margins and fuel growth.


INSIGHTS


|


NOVEMBER 7, 2017


Schneider Electric Alliance | Accenture


Accenture and Schneider Electric formed a strategic alliance to bring new levels of innovation efficiency to the industrial sector. Read more.


INSIGHTS


|


MAY 27, 2019


Accenture and Gasunie Deploy New Digital Gas Transport Management System to Facilitate Safe and Secure Operation of Dutch Gas Grid | Accenture Newsroom


Accenture and Gasunie are deploying a new digital gas transport management system to facilitate operation of a Dutch gas grid.



MAY 8, 2019


General Electric | Accenture Alliance


Accenture and GE have formed a global alliance to help companies take advantage of data that is generated through their business operations.


ACCENTURE ALLIANCE


|


OCTOBER 21, 2014


Blockchain in Oil and Gas | Accenture


Accenture’s blog explains how blockchain enhances the future of procuring, tracking, and paying for products and services in the oil and gas industry. Read more.


BLOGS


|


MAY 13, 2018


Impact of Digital Technologies in Oil and Gas | Accenture


How will electric vehicles impact the oil and gas industry? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JANUARY 14, 2018


Chinese Electric Utility Implements SAP HANA | Accenture


Learn how one Chinese electric power company designed and deployed an SAP HANA-based data management and business intelligence solution with Accenture’s help.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


APRIL 17, 2018


Asset Management for Shaanxi Electric Power | Accenture


See how Accenture helped Shaanxi Electric Power enhance digital asset management for better visibility, information sharing and decision making. Read more.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


FEBRUARY 11, 2019


Oil and Gas Automation | Accenture


Robotic Process Automation can mimic the actions of consistent and detailed workers at a fraction of the cost for high-volume, repetitive tasks. Read more.


BLOGS


|


SEPTEMBER 16, 2018


Oil and Gas Refining | Accenture


How can you use technologies to build, operate and maintain refinery assets? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JUNE 9, 2019


Electric Utilities Use Cost Management and Technology | Accenture


There is a powerful opportunity for electric utilities to use cost management and technology innovation to improve margins and fuel growth.


INSIGHTS


|


NOVEMBER 7, 2017


Schneider Electric Alliance | Accenture


Accenture and Schneider Electric formed a strategic alliance to bring new levels of innovation efficiency to the industrial sector. Read more.


INSIGHTS


|


MAY 27, 2019


Accenture and Gasunie Deploy New Digital Gas Transport Management System to Facilitate Safe and Secure Operation of Dutch Gas Grid | Accenture Newsroom


Accenture and Gasunie are deploying a new digital gas transport management system to facilitate operation of a Dutch gas grid.



MAY 8, 2019


General Electric | Accenture Alliance


Accenture and GE have formed a global alliance to help companies take advantage of data that is generated through their business operations.


ACCENTURE ALLIANCE


|


OCTOBER 21, 2014


Blockchain in Oil and Gas | Accenture


Accenture’s blog explains how blockchain enhances the future of procuring, tracking, and paying for products and services in the oil and gas industry. Read more.


BLOGS


|


MAY 13, 2018


Impact of Digital Technologies in Oil and Gas | Accenture


How will electric vehicles impact the oil and gas industry? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JANUARY 14, 2018


Chinese Electric Utility Implements SAP HANA | Accenture


Learn how one Chinese electric power company designed and deployed an SAP HANA-based data management and business intelligence solution with Accenture’s help.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


APRIL 17, 2018


Asset Management for Shaanxi Electric Power | Accenture


See how Accenture helped Shaanxi Electric Power enhance digital asset management for better visibility, information sharing and decision making. Read more.


CLIENT CASE STUDY


|


FEBRUARY 11, 2019


Oil and Gas Automation | Accenture


Robotic Process Automation can mimic the actions of consistent and detailed workers at a fraction of the cost for high-volume, repetitive tasks. Read more.


BLOGS


|


SEPTEMBER 16, 2018


Oil and Gas Refining | Accenture


How can you use technologies to build, operate and maintain refinery assets? Read more.


BLOGS


|


JUNE 9, 2019
Share:

"SEEKING WORK" at The Oracle Education Center

While "SEEKING WORK" Oracle World after speaking 

Oracle World Security felt that the man who met with former Oracle Corporation spokesman that it was a good thing to eject Bennett to the street.  



Cnetscandal.blogspot.com





Share:

Live Nation Entertainment and Erin Valenti Tinker Ventures Web Development Firm


Live Nation Entertainment 

jumbo text
Live Nation Entertainment is an American global entertainment company, founded in 2010, following the merger of Live Nation and Ticketmaster. The company promotes, operates, and manages ticket sales for live entertainment in the United States and internationally. It also owns and operates entertainment venues, and manages the careers of music artists.

History[edit]

In 2009, Live Nation and Ticketmaster, a concert promotion firm and ticketing company, reached an agreement to merge. The new company received regulatory approval and was named Live Nation Entertainment.[3][4] Michael Rapino, then-CEO of Live Nation, became the new company’s CEO, while Ticketmaster CEO Irving Azoff was named executive chairman.[5]
The merger was approved first in Norway and Turkey in 2009.[6] The United Kingdom's Competition Commission provisionally ruled against the merger, [7] but reversed its decision on December 22, 2009.[6]
The merger was opposed in the U.S. by some regulators, artists, fans, and competing firms, who argued it would reduce competition in the industry and increase ticket costs.[8][9] Artist Bruce Springsteen was one vocal opponent of the merger at the time.[10]
On January 25, 2010, the United States Justice Department approved the merger pending certain conditions.[11] Ticketmaster had to sell ownership of its self-ticketing company, Paciolan,[11] and license its software to Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), which would allow it to compete "head-to-head" with Ticketmaster for business.[12][13] AEG was given the option after five years to buy the software, replace it with something else, or partner with another ticketing company.[12] Additionally, Live Nation Entertainment was placed under a 10-year court order prohibiting it from retaliating against venues that choose to accept competing ticket contracts.[13]

Investments and growth[edit]

In 2013, the company acquired Voodoo Music & Arts Experience and announced a joint venture with Insomniac Events, a promoter focused on electronic dance music.[14][15][16] The company later acquired C3 Presents (2014),[17] Bonnaroo Music and Arts Festival (2015),[18] and Founders Entertainment (2016), the parent company of Governors Ball Music Festival.[19] In October 2016, Live Nation Entertainment bought AC Entertainment, a Knoxville Tennessee music company, [20] as well as several international companies.[21] The company continued to invest in music festivals and promoters in 2017, purchasing a controlling interest in BottleRock Napa Valley Music Festival,[22] Salt Lake City-based concert promoter United Concerts, [23] and CT Touring.[24] In 2017, Live Nation Entertainment reported revenue of $10.3 billion. [25][26] In 2018, the company expanded its concert promotion segment by acquiring a majority stake in a number of companies including Frank Productions,[27] Emporium Presents,[28] and Red Mountain Entertainment.[29]
Also in 2018, the United States Department of Justice launched an investigation following complaints by AEG that Live Nation pressured them into using Ticketmaster and intentionally avoided booking acts for AEG venues.[30] Live Nation stated that decisions in selecting venues were not punitive, and were instead based on size and management.[30]

Operating divisions[edit]

Live Nation Entertainment’s business segments are concerts, ticketing, and sponsorship and advertising. [25] The company promotes and operates live music events and manages artists under its concerts division Live Nation Concerts.[25] Live Nation Entertainment’s artist management arm, called Artist Nation, is included within its concerts division [31][25] and also includes Front Line Management and Roc Nation.[32] Live Nation Entertainment owns and operates venues, including the House of Blues.[33] The company sells tickets to live events through Ticketmaster.[25]

International[edit]

In 2012, the company announced a partnership with Creativeman Productions, based in Tokyo, Japan.[34]
In June 2013, Live Nation was among those charged with violating Ontario health and safety laws following a stage collapse at a Radiohead concert that killed one crew member.[35][36] A 2019 inquest returned a verdict of accidental death.[37]
In August 2015, Live Nation announced it would form Live Nation Germany, to be created in partnership with German promoter Marek Lieberberg. Live Nation Germany would also have oversight over Live Nation events in Austria and Switzerland.[38]
In March 2016, Live Nation acquired Big Concerts International, South Africa's leading concert promoter.[39] The following year, the company acquired majority interests in Israeli promoter Blue Stone Entertainment and the UK’s Cuffe & Taylor.[21]
In May 2018, Live Nation Entertainment acquired a majority stake in Brazil's Rock in Rio festival (including from previous stakeholder SFX Entertainment), with its founder Roberto Medina continuing to manage the festival's operations, and providing consulting to Live Nation.[40][40][41]
Share:

AT&T, Accenture Join Forces to Transform AT&T Consumer Sales and Customer Care

AT&T, Accenture Join Forces to Transform AT&T Consumer Sales and Customer Care

AT&T, Accenture Join Forces to Transform AT&T Consumer Sales and Customer Care

Firms sign agreement to creatively enhance sales and care capability serving nearly 60 million consumers
NEW YORK – Jan. 15, 2002 – AT&T (NYSE: T) and Accenture (NYSE: ACN) today announced an innovative, multi-billion-dollar agreement in which the firms will team to transform AT&T Consumer’s long distance sales and customer care operation. The “co-sourcing” agreement, which calls for AT&T to spend about $2.6 billion over five years, combines the strengths of both companies, each of which will contribute to the management, staffing, technology and culture of the operation.
Under terms of the agreement, AT&T Consumer will continue to be responsible for establishing strategic business direction, defining marketing strategies and designing product offerings. Accenture will be responsible for providing new technology development and ongoing management direction for the transformation of AT&T Consumer’s long distance sales and customer care operation.
“This is a terrific business opportunity for both companies and a positive development for consumers, employees and shareowners,” said Betsy Bernard, AT&T Consumer president and chief executive officer. “This agreement will enable us to continue to deliver the world-class customer care consumers rightly expect from AT&T, while at the same time transform our business to dramatically increase our operational efficiency and significantly reduce costs.”
As part of the agreement, AT&T will provide the vast majority of employees for the “co-sourced” operation. These people will remain on the AT&T payroll, collecting the same AT&T salary and benefits they currently enjoy, and most will continue to perform the same work they do today while reporting to their current AT&T supervisor or manager. Going forward, these costs will become part of the “co-sourced” agreement.
Accenture, in turn, will provide personnel who will help lead the transformation and implement technology and process improvements. Specifically, Accenture will be responsible for deploying innovative new technology to transform AT&T Consumer’s customer care computer and systems infrastructure to enrich AT&T’s interactions with its customers. Accenture also will deliver innovative training and performance management techniques that, in the end, will result in AT&T’s customer care representatives having the leading-edge tools and information they need to serve customers quickly and efficiently for years to come.
The “co-sourced” operation will be led by Bill Stake, currently vice president for AT&T Consumer’s sales and customer care organization.
There will be no immediate change in the ways customers interact with AT&T Consumer. And there are long-term benefits designed into the agreement to enhance customer care and build on AT&T’s tradition of world-class customer service.
Both companies said that today’s agreement also is expected to result in significant savings for AT&T. Specifically, AT&T Consumer said the “co-sourced” operation will enable the company to improve productivity and flexibility while reducing sales and customer care costs by more than half over the life of the agreement.
“AT&T and Accenture are transforming an award-winning sales and customer care team by merging the experience and skills of both organizations,” said Joe Forehand, Accenture chairman and CEO. “This, combined with state-of-the-art technology, will enable AT&T Consumer to serve its customers more quickly and efficiently than ever before.”
Bernard said today’s announcement stemmed from AT&T Consumer’s strategic imperatives to manage the business for cash while transforming its service-delivery operation, even as it explores new opportunities for growth while preparing to become a tracking stock later this year. She emphasized that the company will benefit by having an even clearer expectation of its sales and customer care costs since they’re clearly articulated in the agreement with Accenture.
Bernard said the agreement includes strong performance metrics to ensure the “co-sourced” operation meets quality standards consistent with AT&T’s. The agreement also includes upside opportunities for Accenture and AT&T if the “co-sourced” operation surpasses certain targets, and the ability for AT&T to earn service credits from Accenture if the “co-sourced” operation misses certain targets.
Both companies said the agreement is effective immediately.
About AT&T
AT&T (www.att.com) is among the world’s premier voice, video and data communications companies, serving consumers, businesses and government. Backed by the research and development capabilities of AT&T Labs, the company runs the world’s largest, most sophisticated communications network and is the largest cable operator in the U.S. The company is a leading supplier of data and Internet services for businesses and offers outsourcing, consulting and networking-integration to large businesses.
About Accenture
Accenture is the world’s leading management consulting and technology services organization. Through its network of businesses approach — in which the company enhances its consulting and outsourcing expertise through alliances, affiliated companies and other capabilities — Accenture delivers innovations that help clients across all industries quickly realize their visions. With more than 75,000 people in 47 countries, the company generated net revenues of $11.44 billion for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001. Its home page is www.accenture.com.
Editor’s note: NEWS BRIEFING CONFERENCE CALL
AT&T and Accenture will hold a news briefing conference call at 1:30 p.m. (Eastern time) today with Betsy Bernard, AT&T Consumer president and chief executive officer, and Joe Forehand, Accenture chairman and chief executive officer. The number for today’s briefing is 1-800-288-8961 (U.S.) or 1-612-288-0337 (international). No access code is required. Trouble number: 1-866-892-1640 (U.S.) and 1-612-334-6983 (international). A replay of the news conference will be available for 24 hours beginning this afternoon at 3:00 p.m. (Eastern time) at 1-800-475-6701, access code 623652 (U.S.), or 1-320-365-3844, access code 623652 (international).
The foregoing are "forward-looking statements" which are based on management’s beliefs as well as on a number of assumptions concerning future events made by and information currently available to management. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which are not a guarantee of performance and are subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside AT&T’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For a more detailed description of the factors that could cause such a difference, please see AT&T’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. AT&T disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This information is presented solely to provide additional information to further understand the results of AT&T.

This press release contains forward-looking statements, the accuracy of which is necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied include general economic conditions and other factors, including those discussed in the Accenture Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accenture undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Share:

The Software Contractor and the Oracle vs. PeopleSoft

The Software Contractor and the Oracle vs. PeopleSoft

Pete Bennett worked on the defense side of the hostile takeover of PeopleSoft.  Like many projects Bennett landed far too many were near certain parties, some in the Mormon Church, some deals arrived via CraigsList and some incidents lead to former or current employees of Larry Ellison. 
The next step is lining of the contracts, engagements, projects to how they tie to events such as the PeopleSoft takeover.  I was paid several thousand to sit a few floors below the deal room.

Today Bennett suspects the extremely lightweight project was staged but allowed sensitive slides to leak out through Bennett as in economic espionage .
.  
Share:

Accenture Emails (2019)

Accenture Emails (2019)

This is a temporary list drawn from their site on September 26, 2019
aleks.vujanic@accenture.com
alexander.aizenberg@accenture.com
alexandra.annable@accenture.com
allen.valahu@accenture.com
anthony.hatter@accenture.com
cameria.l.granstra@accenture.com
christian.harper@accenture.com
christina.mcdonald@accenture.com
danielle.i.davis@accenture.com
david.labar@accenture.com
deirdre.m.blackwood@accenture.com
ed.trapasso@accenture.com
elzio.barreto@accenture.com
guy.cantwell@accenture.com
hannah.m.unkefer@accenture.com
james.j.tumminello@accenture.com
jennifer.francis@accenture.com
jens.derksen@accenture.com
joe.x.doyle@accenture.com
joseph.r.dickie@accenture.com
julie.l.bennink@accenture.com
kathryn.rosati@accenture.com
kelly.coffed@accenture.com
lara.wozniak@accenture.com
lucy.d.davies@accenture.com
m.mcginn@accenture.com
margaret.d.nolan@accenture.com
maryjane.o.norris@accenturefederal.com
matthew.corser@accenture.com
melissa.curtis@accenture.com
melissa.volin@accenture.com
molly.mcdonagh@accenture.com
mylissa.tsai@accenture.com
natalie.de.freitas@accenture.com
peter.y.soh@accenture.com
pooneh.fooladi@accenture.com
quentin.nolibois@accenture.com
sean.k.conway@accenture.com
shana.kleinfeldt@accenture.com
stacey.jones@accenture.com
tara.burns@accenture.com
youssef.zauaghi@accenture.com

Share:

Computerland Corporate - The Key Actors in 1980s and 1995

Computerland Walnut Creek

Client of Mainframe Designs

When Pete Bennett was a small but growing business in 1987 building software to control manufacturing at Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures. 

ComputerLand Stores
Mainframe Designs Cabinets and Fixtures - Approved Computerland Stores Vendor
col-12

The first store was located on 675 Ygnacio Valley Road better known as Walnut Creek Financial Plaza from 1982 to about 1985 until they crashed went to the Bankruptcy Court.

Share:

Vinod Khosla ~ The Billionaire with many houses, Pete Bennett Jobs Activist at Sun Micro - now homeless

Connecting Vinod Khosla where Pete Bennett founder of nomoreh1b.com (Stolen by Godaddy Investors) held a protest with other US Workers losing their job. 

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammell Crow, Lennar, Catellus and Khosla Ventures.


About Pete Bennett
Software Developer / Programmer / Jobs Activist on H-1b / Arson Victim / Fraud Victim / Victim in Several Police Corruption Incidents / Whistle Blower Case Morphed into SEC Witness Retaliation /

Over 40 years Mr. Bennett went a long run of complex cases, incidents, fires, accidents and attempts on his life.  The sources of these perplexing incidents, legal cases and endless setbacks bubbled up in 2011 via arrests of Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Taskforce (CNET) but his courtroom losses resulted in losses in the millions.

The end result suggests possibly one of the longest unchecked Racketeering, Witness Tampering and Witness Murders operation of all time.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.

There are many story connections to 101 Ygnacio Valley Road Walnut Creek, one is Lawrence Investments which is legal name for Real Estate Empire of Larry Ellison, the other is Nearon Properties, and several law firms that win cases against but refuse to consider cases connected to Pete Bennett.



Vinod Khosla
Vinod KhoslaBorn: 28-Jan-1955
Birthplace: Pune, India
Gender: Male
Race or Ethnicity: Asian/Indian
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Business
Nationality: United States
Executive summary: Venture capitalist
Investor in ethanol companies. Unfortunately, Khosla is not an expert on the subject, and additionally will distort both facts and figures to make the ethanol picture appear much rosier than it is. Claims he has made include that ethanol is more efficient than petroleum (false by a wide margin), that ethanol is cheaper than gasoline (consistently false for the last quarter century), and that Brazil has replaced 40% of their petroleum use with ethanol (his inflated by a factor of four, it is closer to 10%). The truth is that all energy scenarios for the United States are bleak, and ethanol will be little help.
Wife: (four children)
    University: BSEE, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
    University: MS Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University
    University: MBA, Stanford University (1979)
    Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers General Partner (1986-)
    Daisy Systems Co-Founder
    Sun Microsystems Founding CEO (1982-85)
    Biden for President 
    Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee 
    Energy Future Coalition Steering Committee
    Friends of Dick Lugar 
    George W. Bush for President 
    Hillary Clinton for President 
    John Kerry for President 
    John McCain 2008 
    Kerry Victory 2004 
    National Venture Capital Association 
    Obama for America 
    Obama Victory Fund 2012 
    World Technology Network 
    FILMOGRAPHY AS ACTOR
    The Singularity Is Near (26-Aug-2010)
Share:

Form 10-K APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC

Connecting Success Factors to Bennett

The Dubious Phone Call and Time Wasting Project
The folks at TPG will have to answer to my Whistleblower Complaints on the truly odd collection of RFPs emanating from companies connected to Richard Blum, William McGlashan, CBRE, Regency Centers, Trammel Crow, Lennar, Catellus.

My story is about witness murders, private equity, mergers and acquisitions linked back to the Matter of Bennett v. Southern Pacific lost in 1989.  It was a winnable case as long the witnesses testified.  
xxxx2
xxxx9
10-K d281180d10k.htm FORM 10-K
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K


(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO             
Commission File Number: 001-35107


APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware20-8880053
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
9 West 57th Street, 43rd Floor
New York, New York
10019
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(212) 515-3200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A shares representing limited liability company interestsNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None


Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities.    Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ¨
  Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
As of June 30, 2011 the aggregate market value of 47,969,316 Class A shares held by non-affiliates was approximately $825 million.
As of March 7, 2012 there were 126,309,787 Class A shares and 1 Class B share outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None




Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page
PART I  
ITEM 1.
  7  
ITEM 1A.
  29  
ITEM 1B.
  68  
ITEM 2.
  69  
ITEM 3.
  69  
ITEM 4.
  70  
PART II  
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES  71  
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA  73  
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  76  
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  155  
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA  160  
ITEM 9.
CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  254  
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  254  
ITEM 9B.
  254  
PART III  
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  255  
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  262  
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS  274  
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE  277  
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES  287  
PART IV  
ITEM 15.
  288  
  292  

2

Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This report may contain forward looking statements that are within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include, but are not limited to, discussions related to Apollo’s expectations regarding the performance of its business, its liquidity and capital resources and the other non-historical statements in the discussion and analysis. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used in this report, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including risks relating to our dependence on certain key personnel, our ability to raise new private equity, capital markets or real estate funds, market conditions, generally; our ability to manage our growth, fund performance, changes in our regulatory environment and tax status, the variability of our revenues, net income and cash flow, our use of leverage to finance our businesses and investments by our funds and litigation risks, among others. We believe these factors include but are not limited to those described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this report, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other cautionary statements that are included in this release and in other filings. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Terms Used in This Report
In this report, references to “Apollo,” “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer collectively to Apollo Global Management, LLC and its subsidiaries, including the Apollo Operating Group and all of its subsidiaries.
“AMH” refers to Apollo Management Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership owned by APO Corp. and Holdings;
“Apollo funds” and “our funds” refer to the funds, alternative asset companies and other entities that are managed by the Apollo Operating Group. “Apollo Operating Group” refers to:

(i)the limited partnerships through which our Managing Partners currently operate our businesses; and

(ii)one or more limited partnerships formed for the purpose of, among other activities, holding certain of our gains or losses on our principal investments in the funds, which we refer to as our “principal investments.”
“Apollo Operating Group” refers to (i) the limited partnerships through which our managing partners currently operate our businesses and (ii) one or more limited partnerships formed for the purpose of, among other activities, holding certain of our gains or losses on our principal investments in the funds, which we refer to as our “principal investments”;
“Assets Under Management,” or “AUM,” refers to the investments we manage or with respect to which we have control, including capital we have the right to call from our investors pursuant to their capital commitments to various funds. Our AUM equals the sum of:

(i)the fair value of our private equity investments plus the capital that we are entitled to call from our investors pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments plus non-recallable capital to the extent a fund is within the commitment period in which management fees are calculated based on total commitments to the fund;

3

Table of Contents
(ii)the net asset value, or “NAV,” of our capital markets funds, other than certain senior credit funds, which are structured as collateralized loan obligations (such as Artus, which we measure by using the mark-to-market value of the aggregate principal amount of the underlying collateralized loan obligations) or certain collateralized loan obligation and collateralized debt obligation credit funds that have a fee generating basis other than mark-to-market asset values, plus used or available leverage and/or capital commitments;

(iii)the gross asset values or net asset values of our real estate entities and the structured portfolio vehicle investments included within the funds we manage, which includes the leverage used by such structured portfolio vehicles;

(iv)the incremental value associated with the reinsurance investments of the portfolio company assets that we manage; and

(v)the fair value of any other investments that we manage plus unused credit facilities, including capital commitments for investments that may require pre-qualification before investment plus any other capital commitments available for investment that are not otherwise included in the clauses above.
Our AUM measure includes Assets Under Management for which we charge either no or nominal fees. Our definition of AUM is not based on any definition of Assets Under Management contained in our operating agreement or in any of our Apollo fund management agreements. We consider multiple factors for determining what should be included in our definition of AUM. Such factors include but are not limited to (1) our ability to influence the investment decisions for existing and available assets; (2) our ability to generate income from the underlying assets in our funds; and (3) the AUM measures that we use internally or believe are used by other investment managers. Given the differences in the investment strategies and structures among other alternative investment managers, our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations employed by other investment managers and, as a result, this measure may not be directly comparable to similar measures presented by other investment managers.
Fee-generating AUM consists of assets that we manage and on which we earn management fees or monitoring fees pursuant to management agreements on a basis that varies among the Apollo funds. Management fees are normally based on “net asset value,” “gross assets,” “adjusted par asset value,” “adjusted cost of all unrealized portfolio investments,” “capital commitments,” “adjusted assets,” “stockholders’ equity,” “invested capital” or “capital contributions,” each as defined in the applicable management agreement. Monitoring fees for AUM purposes are based on the total value of certain structured portfolio vehicle investments, which normally include leverage, less any portion of such total value that is already considered in fee-generating AUM.
Non-fee generating AUM consists of assets that do not produce management fees or monitoring fees. These assets generally consist of the following: (a) fair value above invested capital for those funds that earn management fees based on invested capital, (b) net asset values related to general partner and co-investment ownership, (c) unused credit facilities, (d) available commitments on those funds that generate management fees on invested capital, (e) structured portfolio vehicle investments that do not generate monitoring fees and (f) the difference between gross assets and net asset value for those funds that earn management fees based on net asset value. We use non-fee generating AUM combined with fee-generating AUM as a performance measurement of our investment activities, as well as to monitor fund size in relation to professional resource and infrastructure needs. Non-fee generating AUM includes assets on which we could earn carried interest income.
“carried interest,” “incentive income” and “carried interest income” refer to interests granted to Apollo by an Apollo fund that entitle Apollo to receive allocations, distributions or fees calculated by reference to the performance of such fund or its underlying investments;
“co-founded” means the individual joined Apollo in 1990, the year in which the company commenced business operations;

4

Table of Contents
“contributing partners” refers to those of our partners (and their related parties) who indirectly own (through Holdings) Apollo Operating Group units;
“distressed and event-driven hedge funds” refers to certain of our capital markets funds, including SVF, VIF, SOMA, AAOF and certain of our strategic investment accounts;
“feeder funds” refer to funds that operate by placing substantially all of their assets in, and conducting substantially all of their investment and trading activities through, a master fund, which is designed to facilitate collective investment by the participating feeder funds. With respect to certain of our funds that are organized in a master-feeder structure, the feeder funds are permitted to make investments outside the master fund when deemed appropriate by the fund’s investment manager;
“gross IRR” of a fund represents the cumulative investment-related cash flows for all of the investors in the fund on the basis of the actual timing of investment inflows and outflows (for unrealized investments assuming disposition on December 31, 2011 or other date specified) aggregated on a gross basis quarterly, and the return is annualized and compounded before management fees, carried interest and certain other fund expenses (including interest incurred by the fund itself) and measures the returns on the fund’s investments as a whole without regard to whether all of the returns would, if distributed, be payable to the fund’s investors;
“Holdings” means AP Professional Holdings, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership through which our managing partners and contributing partners hold their Apollo Operating Group units;
“IRS” refers to the Internal Revenue Service;
“managing partners” refers to Messrs. Leon Black, Joshua Harris and Marc Rowan collectively and, when used in reference to holdings of interests in Apollo or Holdings, includes certain related parties of such individuals;
“net IRR” of a fund means the gross IRR applicable to all investors, including related parties which may not pay fees, net of management fees, organizational expenses, transaction costs, and certain other fund expenses (including interest incurred by the fund itself) and realized carried interest all offset to the extent of interest income, and measures returns based on amounts that, if distributed, would be paid to investors of the fund; to the extent that an Apollo private equity fund exceeds all requirements detailed within the applicable fund agreement, the estimated unrealized value is adjusted such that a percentage of up to 20.0% of the unrealized gain is allocated to the general partner, thereby reducing the balance attributable to fund investors;
“net return” for Value Funds, SOMA and AAOF represents the calculated return that is based on month-to-month changes in net assets and is calculated using the returns that have been geometrically linked based on capital contributions, distributions and dividend reinvestments, as applicable;
“our manager” means AGM Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that is controlled by our managing partners;
“permanent capital” means capital of funds that do not have redemption provisions or a requirement to return capital to investors upon exiting the investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law, which currently consist of AAA, Apollo Investment Corporation and Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.; such funds may be required, or elect, to return all or a portion of capital gains and investment income;

“private equity investments” refers to (i) direct or indirect investments in existing and future private equity funds managed or sponsored by Apollo, (ii) direct or indirect co-investments with existing and future private equity funds managed or sponsored by Apollo, (iii) direct or indirect investments in securities which are not
Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts