The Anatomy of Public Corruption

Showing posts with label The 9/11 Investigation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The 9/11 Investigation. Show all posts

The FBI Agent who sued over the Anthrax Investigation

PCB10019 The Anthrax Investigation

Bennett Customer

Card image cap

Pete Bennett a resident of Contra Costa County since 1978 has left numerous requests for police reports. Behind Bennett is a meter reader, a Walnut Creek Police Car and the boot of an officer while he lay bleeding in the street. Bennett was taken to Kaiser for scans when did get the skull fracture, then she noticed the broken collar bone, then the rotator cuff, then she noticed this was the first assualt case based on my charts.

The Titan's Feel Good Story Bennett Public Poison Allegations HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM Posted on The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation – Richard Lambert – has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t: In the fall of 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, a series of anthrax mailings occurred which killed five Americans and sickened 17 others. Four anthrax-laden envelopes were recovered which were addressed to two news media outlets in New York City (the New York Post and Tom Brokaw at NBC) and two senators in Washington D.C. (Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle). The anthrax letters addressed to New York were mailed on September 18, 2001, just seven days after the 9/11 attacks. The letters addressed to the senators were mailed 21 days later on October 9, 2001. A fifth mailing of anthrax is believed to have been directed to American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida based upon the death of one AMI employee from anthrax poisoning and heavy spore contamination in the building. Pete Bennett said "POISON" publicly Less than four days later my The Strack Family (Mormon) (Bennett relatives) were murdered in Springville UT. The COD was poison, methadone and cold medicine (codeine). There are stolen trust documents linked to this murder are with Alamo 1st Members linked to my former Employer Ivory Consulting , whose clients include GE Capital, Caterpillar and other companies that require leasing solutions. Chris took all my files with the help of the Mormon Church which economically devastated me financially. What I'm saying today will end up in a RICO lawsuit just Mr. Lambert's allegations which mirror my separate story. My former employer assisted with abducting, then brainwashing my sons into the Mormon Church.

When uncorvring a long list of suicides, accidents and fires near these people it was clear they are experts thieves. Alice Roberts estate was plundered by David Nearon is one of many examples. Exonerating Evidence for Ivins Agent Lambert won’t publicly disclose the exculpatory evidence against Ivins. As the New York Times reports : [Lambert] declined to be specific, saying that most of the information was protected by the Privacy Act and was unlikely to become public unless Congress carried out its own inquiry. But there is already plenty of exculpatory evidence in the public record. For example : Handwriting analysis failed to link the anthrax letters to known writing samples from Ivins No textile fibers were found in Ivins’ office, residence or vehicles matching fibers found on the scotch tape used to seal the envelopes No pens were found matching the ink used to address the envelopes Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters No souvenirs of the crime, such as newspaper clippings, were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases

The FBI could not place Ivins at the crime scene with evidence, such as gas station or other receipts, at the time the letters were mailed in September and October 2001 Lab records show the number of late nights Ivins put in at the lab first spiked in August 2001, weeks before the 9/11 attacks As noted above, the FBI didn’t want to test the DNA sample found on the anthrax letter to Senator Leahy. In addition, McClatchy points out : After locking in on Ivins in 2007, the bureau stopped searching for a match to a unique genetic bacterial strain scientists had found in the anthrax that was mailed to the Post and to NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, although a senior bureau official had characterized it as the hottest clue to date.

Anthrax vaccine expert Meryl Nass. M.D., notes : The FBI’s alleged motive is bogus. In 2001, Bioport’s anthrax vaccine could not be (legally) relicensed due to potency failures, and its impending demise provided room for Ivins’ newer anthrax vaccines to fill the gap. Ivins had nothing to do with developing Bioport’s vaccine, although in addition to his duties working on newer vaccines, he was charged with assisting Bioport to get through licensure. *** The FBI report claims the anthrax letters envelopes were sold in Frederick, Md. Later it admits that millions of indistinguishable envelopes were made, with sales in Maryland and Virginia. *** FBI emphasizes Ivins’ access to a photocopy machine, but fails to mention it was not the machine from which the notes that accompanied the spores were printed.

FBI Fudged the Science 16 government labs had access to the same strain of anthrax as used in the anthrax letters. The FBI admitted that up to 400 people had access to flask of anthrax in Dr. Ivins’ lab. In other words, even if the killer anthrax came from there, 399 other people might have done it. Moreover, even the FBI’s claim that the killer anthrax came from Ivins’ flask has completely fallen apart. Specifically, both the National Academy of Science and the Government Accountability Office – both extremely prestigious, nonpartisan agencies – found that FBI’s methodology and procedures for purportedly linking the anthrax flask maintained by Dr. Ivins with the anthrax letters was sloppy, inconclusive and full of holes . They found that the alleged link wasn’t very strong … and that there was no firm link . Indeed, the National Academy of Sciences found that the anthrax mailed to Congressmen and the media could have come from a different source altogether than the flask maintained by Ivins. Additionally, the Ft. Detrick facility – where Ivins worked – only handled liquid anthrax. But the killer anthrax was a hard-to-make dry powder form of anthrax.

Ft. Detrick doesn’t produce dry anthrax; but other government labs – for example Dugway (in Utah) and Batelle (in Ohio) – do. The anthrax in the letters was also incredibly finely ground; and the FBI’s explanation for how the anthrax became so finely ground doesn’t even pass the smell test Further, the killer anthrax in the letters had a very high-tech anti-static coating so that the anthrax sample "floated off the glass slide and was lost" when scientists tried to examine it. Specifically, the killer anthrax was coated with polyglass and each anthrax spore given an electrostatic charge , so that it would repel other spores and "float". This was very advanced bio-weapons technology to which even Ivins’ bosses said he didn’t have access. Top anthrax experts like Richard Spertzel say that Ivins didn’t do it. Spertzel also says that only 4 or 5 people in the entire country knew how to make anthrax of the "quality" used in the letters, that Spertzel was one of them, and it would have taken him a year with a full lab and a staff of helpers to do it. As such, the FBI’s claim that Ivins did it alone working a few nights is ludicrous. Moreover, the killer anthrax contained silicon … but the anthrax in Ivins’ flask did not . The FBI claimed the silicon present in the anthrax letters was absorbed from its surroundings … but Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories completely debunked that theory. In other words, silicon was intentionally added to the killer anthrax to make it more potent. Ivins and Ft. Detrick didn’t have that capability … but other government labs did .

Similarly, Sandia National Lab found the presence of iron and tin in the killer anthrax … but NOT in Ivins’ flask of anthrax. Sandia also found that there was a strain of bacteria in one of the anthrax letters not present in Ivins’ flask. (The bacteria, iron, tin and silicon were all additives which made the anthrax in the letters more deadly.) The Anthrax Frame Up Ivins wasn’t the first person framed for the anthrax attacks … Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like ). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. And see this People don’t remember now, but the "war on terror" and Iraq war were largely based on the claim that Saddam and Muslim extremists were behind the anthrax attacks (and see this and this ) And the anthrax letters pushed a terrified Congress into approving the Patriot Act without even reading it .

Coincidentally, the only Congressmen who received anthrax letters were the ones who were likely to oppose the Patriot Act . And – between the bogus Al Qaeda/Iraq claims and the FBI’s fingering of Ivins as the killer – the FBI was convinced that another U.S. government scientist, Steven Hatfill, did it. The government had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit for being falsely accused. Ivins’ Convenient Death It is convenient for the FBI that Ivins died.

The Wall Street Journal points out : No autopsy was performed [on Ivins], and there was no suicide note. Dr. Nass points out : FBI fails to provide any discussion of why no autopsy was performed, nor why, with Ivins under 24/7 surveillance from the house next door, Garbage being combed through, the FBI failed to notice that he overdosed and went into a coma. Nor is there any discussion of why the FBI didn’t immediately identify tylenol as the overdose substance, and notify the hospital, A well-known antidote for tylenol toxicity could be given (N-acetyl cysteine, or alternatively glutathione). These omissions support the suggestion that Ivins’ suicide was a convenience for the FBI. It enabled them to conclude the anthrax case, in the absence of evidence that would satisfy the courts. Indeed, one of Ivins’ colleagues at Ft. Deitrich thinks he was murdered . Whether murder or suicide, Ivins’ death was very convenient for the FBI, as dead men can’t easily defend themselves.

Share:

Anthrax FBI Reward and Doc's Pharmacy Bacteria Walnut Creek


Share:

2003/10/30 - NIMDA / ANTHRAX / July 2003 the B of A Programmer Suicide

SECSYM: Security Symposium I



Most of the security vulnerabilities that have been found in Windows over the last
couple of years have not related to security features. For that reason, it's important
that every developer understands how to build secure code. Yet it's not something
that most people have had training on - it's not taught as part of most CS undergraduate
courses, for instance. At Microsoft, it's been a long road over the last couple of
years during which every developer has undertaken specific training on writing secure
code.
Security is becoming more challenging: the time-to-exploit has been decreasing (from
331 days for Nimda to 25 days to Blaster). There is no silver bullet to ensuring security
within a code base, it's something that takes a pervasive effort.
The Microsoft security framework comprises three key concepts: secure by design, secure
by default and secure in deployment - known as SD3. Secure by design means security-aware
features, and deliberate design to reduce vulnerabilities. Secure by default means
switching off unneeded features - unless 90% of users require a feature, the goal
in Windows is to switch that feature off on a clean installation. Finally, secure
by deployment means creating processes and guidance to deploy secure systems, along
with tools in the products to defend and update against vulnerabilities.
The SD3 approach includes a "Top 10" checklist:
  1. Build threat models: ensuring the design models potential attacks.
  2. Removing security flaws in source code: reviewing each line (against buffer overruns,
    for instance).
  3. Avoid new security flaws: for new code, being extra careful to prevent against flaws
    being introduced.
  4. Use managed code today: because it provides many intrinsic protections that can help
    reduce vulnerabilities.
  5. Use tools and checklists: books including Writing
    Secure Code
    , along with other patterns and practices (1 2).
  6. Turn features off: reducing attack surface by removing unneeded features that could
    be used in an exploit.
  7. Require minimum privilege: ensuring that even a successful exploit has limited value
    for compromising the machine.
  8. Add extra defensive layers: specific technologies to insulate an exploit from getting
    at the underlying system, as implemented in "Springboard" (see below).
  9. Be firewall and antivirus friendly: make sure that applications co-operate well with
    such environments.
  10. Create security guidance and documentation: giving the end-customer guidance on how
    to make their system more secure.
These approaches have been effective with recently released products. Subsequent to
the launch of the Trustworthy
Computing
 initiative, many products have completed full security reviews, checking
each line of code for potential vulnerabilities. For instance, Windows Server 2003
had 6 vulnerabilities in the first 180 days, compared to 21 vulnerabilities over the
first 180 days after the launch of Windows 2000 Server.
The aim too is to reduce the hassle of installing patches:
  • Reducing complexity: one patch experience
  • Reducing risk: better quality patches and a rollback capability for all patches
  • Reducing size: delta patching, enabling far smaller patches to download
  • Reducing downtime: doing everything possible to create patches that don't require
    reboots
  • Extending automation: making it easier to deploy patches using tools like Software
    Update Services
     and SMS
    2003
    .
Windows XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 SP1 will include some new technologies (codenamed
"Springboard")
to add extra defensive mechanisms - inspecting packets, enabling the NX feature in
newer processors to create non-execute data pages, and to enable protection technologies
by default (such as ICF).
Windows XP SP2 will be in beta by the end of this year and released in the first half
of 2004; Windows Server 2003 SP1 will be in beta in the first half of 2004 and released
in the second half of 2004.
Share:

Beazley Syndicate of Lloyds of London -|- John P. Makin is a litigation and insurance specialist.

John P. Makin is a litigation and insurance specialist.
Mr. Makin has a broad litigation background, trying cases and appearing before state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as administrative and regulatory agencies. His litigation repertoire includes a variety of subject matters, such as trade regulation in the media field, engineering liability, commercial land use and regulation, eminent domain, environmental regulation, intellectual property and construction disputes.

He has represented clients in coverage evaluation and in coverage litigation in state and federal courts throughout California. Mr. Makin's knowledge and background transcends insurance litigation, as he has acted as a counselor and advisor to numerous insurance companies and insurance service organization Insurance Services Office, Inc. He counseled clients concerning the use and approval of policy forms and rates, and worked extensively with the California Insurance Department and Insurance Commissioner. He has worked with insurance clients in the drafting of forms, most recently technology specialty and technology errors and omissions forms. In 2001, he spent several months in the London offices of the Beazley Syndicate of Lloyds of London. While here, Mr. Makin consulted on the evaluation of risks and claims, and the drafting of policy forms in connection with technology errors and omissions and specialty intellectual property insurance policies.

Mr. Makin also has broad experience in anti-trust and trade regulation, particularly applicable to the insurance industry. He was California counsel for ISO in the insurance anti-trust litigation which came before the United States Supreme Court. He was counsel for ISO in the Proposition 103 litigation in the California Supreme Court, and commented upon and counseled clients with regard to the California Attorney General's anti-trust guidelines for the insurance industry.

Mr. Makin received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, as well as a commission as an Ensign in the United States Navy, in 1972. After serving more than four years as an officer in the United States Navy, he attended Northwestern University Law School in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated magna cum laude with a Juris Doctor degree, as well as Order of the Coif, in 1979. He was admitted to the California State Bar in 1979, and is admitted to practice before the United States District Courts for the Northern, Eastern and Central Districts of California, and the Fourth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal.

Mr. Makin was a founding partner of Greenan, Peffer, Sallander & Lally, LLP
Share:

Fremont Partners Closes $920 Million Fund

Gates goes long, Bennett comes up short.

Gates and Buffett each have interests in from 1990.  The losses were brutal, the loss of cruel and unnecessary as they should have taken my life instead.

Fremont Partners Closes $920 Million Fund

A 1989 Witness Murder, Bennett v. Southern Pacific, Fremont Group, District Attorney Mark Peterson and JonBenet Ramsey
Bennett lost millions in a Contra Costa County Courtroom, He lost his sons to Judge connected to the Clinton, he lost his best friend to a rope and the rafter.
San Francisco, California - February 4, 2002
Fremont Partners announced that it has closed on $920 million of commitments for Fremont Partners III, a private equity fund established to continue Fremont Partners' successful middle market investment program. The fund exceeded its $850 million target and represents a significant increase over Fremont Partners II, a $605 million fund established in 1996.

The successful fundraising effort includes strong support from existing and new investors. Investors participating in both funds have increased their commitments by 75%, while new investors comprise approximately 30% of Fremont Partners III. Representative investors include AMR Investments, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Boeing, Delta Air Lines, Fremont Group, General Motors Asset Management, MetLife, The Vanderbilt University and Verizon Investment Management, as well as state pension plans, foundations and high net worth investors.
"We believe our fundraising success in today’s difficult marketplace is a result of investor confidence in Fremont Partners’ team, the consistency of our middle market strategy and the return opportunities available in the middle market," said James Farrell, Managing Director.
Fremont Partners makes substantial equity investments in operating companies with enterprise values generally up to $1 billion, typically seeking to deploy $50 million to $250 million in each situation. The firm looks for companies with sound business franchises, substantial unrealized potential, and proven management teams. Fremont Partners invests across a range of industries, including business services, financial services, consumer products, industrial products, building products, packaging, and health care, among others. The fund seeks businesses with leading market positions, strong organic revenue growth supported by sustainable trends, attractive EBITDA margins, high returns on tangible capital, strong free cash flow, and substantial investment commitment from management.
"The strong growth in revenues, cash flow and earnings achieved by our existing portfolio companies in 2001 demonstrated the merits of our investment strategy and contributed to the success of fundraising," added Mark Williamson, Managing Director.

Founded in 1991, Fremont Partners (www.caleracapital.com) has invested over $900 million in equity capital representing approximately $4 billion of transactions. Fremont Partners has a proven track record of working in close partnership with management to build sustainable value in each portfolio company.
Fremont Partners is sponsored by its investment professionals and Fremont Group. Fremont Partners is the principal entity through which Fremont Group conducts its private equity investing in established operating businesses. Fremont Group, a private investment firm, is majority owned by members of the Bechtel family and is responsible for managing approximately $11 billion in assets.

The Dead Witnesses of Contra Costa

A 1989 Witness Murder, Bennett v. Southern Pacific, Fremont Group, District Attorney Mark Peterson and JonBenet Ramsey
The Press Release 
Fremont Partners
FREE0001
Share:

#deadwitness One Dead PIMCO Banker is one too many

A Dead Banker was a PIMCO Banker

source:LA TIMES

Harvard Business Classes

Domestic Terrorism vs Insider Terrorism ~ Rapid Free-Falling quantitive analytics, depth of field analytics, opitcal illusions, deception and obstruction of justice, interference of investigation and placing children as your prop.

SEC Nipping at Problem

A federal investigation of Pacific Investment Management Co. is the latest crack in the armor of the $2-trillion Newport Beach fund giant, where a trustee recently questioned the $200-million salary, "bullying" behavior and "mediocre" recent performance of co-founder Bill Gross.
Word of the Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry follows a series of setbacks for Pimco, including the abrupt departure of Gross' heir apparent, Mohamed El-Erian, reports of clashes between the two and an outflow of more than $65 billion in investors' money from Gross' signature Total Return Fund.
dd Pimco said it is cooperating with the SEC, which is examining whether Pimco improperly inflated the price of bond holdings in an exchange traded fund. That could have increased the publicly reported value of the fund, which Gross personally managed.

The ETF, as such funds are known, was set up to mirror the investment style of Gross' Total Return Fund, which serves giant institutional investors. The Total Return Fund, which has $221 billion in assets, is the world's largest bond mutual fund and a staple of 401(k) and other retirement plans across the nation. The $3.6-billion Total Return Fund ETF reported investment gains of 8.7% from March through August 2012, its first six months of existence. That compared with a gain of 5.2% for the Total Return Fund it emulated, which at the time was growing rapidly and exceeded $270 billion in assets.
The Newport Beach company, which Gross co-founded in 1971, denied any wrongdoing.

"We take our regulatory obligations and responsibilities to our clients very seriously," the firm said in a statement. "We believe our pricing procedures are entirely appropriate and in keeping with industry best practices."
Pimco declined to comment further on the SEC investigation. A spokesman for the SEC in Washington declined to comment.
A person close to the investigation, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation is confidential, told The Times that investigators from several SEC offices around the country have been working on the case.
The investigation was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, which quoted unidentified sources as saying the SEC has been looking at the case for at least a year. Investigators have recently interviewed Pimco executives, and spent more than a day questioning the 70-year-old Gross.



The disclosure of the investigation follows other turmoil at Pimco. In a March interview with The Times, a longtime independent trustee on the board that oversees Pimco, William J. Popejoy, publicly criticized Gross — specifically his high pay, amid the fund's declining performance.
That followed high-profile clashes between Gross and El-Erian, including allegations that Gross had monitored El-Erian's phone calls.
A midsummer Pimco regulatory filing said Popejoy had resigned from the board. Popejoy's attorney said that was inaccurate but declined to elaborate on Popejoy's version of events.
Independent bond fund trustees such as Popejoy don't work for money management firms like Pimco; their job is to oversee the funds, monitoring performance on behalf of investors and negotiating the fees paid to the fund managers.


They generally work far from public scrutiny, and a bond fund trustee criticizing an asset manager, as Popejoy did, is "extremely rare," said Eric Jacobson, director of fixed-income research at fund tracker Morningstar Inc. "I cannot remember seeing anything like this in the last 10 to 15 years."
Popejoy has since declined to speak publicly about Gross and the proceedings of the board of trustees, citing the advice of attorneys. In a recent interview, he did say he had differences with the board chairman, Brent R. Harris, a Pimco managing director who is one of two insiders on the seven-man board.
One disagreement centered on the lack of diversity on the board, which is made up entirely of white men, Popejoy said.
He said that when the independent trustee Vern O. Curtis, 80, decided to step down, Harris wanted the replacement to be Peter B. McCarthy, a former banker and U.S. Treasury official. McCarthy already sits on the board that oversees Pimco's small collection of stock mutual funds.
Popejoy said he instead lobbied to add a female or minority member to the board.

Harris did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Pimco Funds have yet to replace Popejoy or Curtis.
The SEC probe focused on whether Gross' ETF fund misled investors through such actions as buying bonds at a discount, then putting a higher value on them when reporting fund results, the Journal reported. Doing so would increase the reported net asset value of the funds.
The SEC has conducted a series of investigations of such pricing issues at mutual funds, and in some cases has brought civil charges. In 2012, UBS Global Asset Management paid $300,000 to settle accusations that it improperly priced securities in three mutual funds.
Such cases, however, can be complicated to sort out. Investigations often find no violations, said Michael Herbst, a Morningstar director of manager research.
Exchange-traded funds often do better, at least at first, than the large funds they emulate. The smaller ETFs are "nimble" and can negotiate discounts and turn quick profits on deals too small for the large funds to pursue, he said.
A powerful bond ETF like the one headed by Gross, for example, might often be able to find small, thinly traded holdings of certain corporate bonds or exotic mortgage securities that could be purchased at a sharp discount.
If an independent valuation firm, such as Interactive Data or Thompson Reuters, was unable to find a recent sale of identical securities, as often occurs, it would then estimate the value for the holdings based on recent sales of similar bonds, Herbst said. That could yield a higher value.
If the mutual fund accurately reported the purchase price, along with the independent valuation, the SEC would probably find no violation, Herbst said. Any violations of securities laws would stem from the mutual fund lying about the purchase price or the independently estimated value.
Share:

Anchor links for post titles

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Labels

Recent Posts

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Pages

Labels

Blog Archive

Recent Posts